Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-26T18:56:42.750Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Inappropriate shock delivery by an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator due to electrical interference with a refrigerator in a 4-year-old child

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 September 2021

Sezen Gulumser Sisko*
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul Mehmet Akif Ersoy Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
Hasan Candas Kafali
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul Mehmet Akif Ersoy Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
Yakup Ergul
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul Mehmet Akif Ersoy Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
*
Author for correspondence: S. G. Sisko, Department of Pediatric Cardiology, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul Mehmet Akif Ersoy Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey. Tel: +90536 666 23 22; Fax: +90 (212) 632 00 50. E-mail: nezes_d@hotmail.com

Abstract

We report a patient with long QT syndrome who received an inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shock due to electrical interference from a refrigerator. This electrical interference was mistakenly detected as an episode of ventricular fibrillation and ended with an inappropriate delivery of shock without any warning symptoms before.

Type
Brief Report
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Pai, RK, Abedin, M, Rawling, DA. Inappropriate ICD shocks for inappropriate reasons. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J 2008; 8: 6971.Google ScholarPubMed
Chan, NY, Wai-Ling Ho, L. Inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shock due to external alternating current leak: report of two cases. Europace 2005; 7: 193196. DOI 10.1016/j.eupc.2004.09.010.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sabaté, X, Moure, C, Nicolás, J, Sedó, M, Navarro, X. Washing machine associated 50 Hz detected as ventricular fibrillation by an implanted cardioverter defibrillator. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2001; 24: 12811283. DOI 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2001.01281.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garnreiter, JM, Pilcher, TA, Etheridge, SP, Saarel, EV. Inappropriate ICD shocks in pediatrics and congenital heart disease patients: risk factors and programming strategies. Heart Rhythm 2015; 12: 937942. DOI 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.01.028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krause, U, Müller, MJ, Wilberg, Y, et al. Transvenous and non-transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in children, adolescents, and adults with congenital heart disease: who is at risk for appropriate and inappropriate shocks? Europace 2019; 21: 106113. DOI 10.1093/europace/euy219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garnreiter, JM. Inappropriate ICD shocks in pediatric and congenital heart disease patients. J Innov Card Rhythm Manag 2017; 8: 28982906. DOI 10.19102/icrm.2017.081104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Al Khadra, AS, Al Jutaily, A, Al Shuhri, S. Detection of refrigerator-associated 60 Hz alternating current as ventricular fibrillation by an implantable defibrillator. Europace 2006; 8: 175177. DOI 10.1093/europace/euj001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed