Skip to main content Accessibility help

Empowering a database with national long-term data about mortality: the use of national death registries

  • David L.S. Morales (a1), Andrew J. McClellan (a2) and Jeffrey P. Jacobs (a3)


The interest of professional medical societies in research about outcomes, mixed with the recent accessibility to management of data on the internet, has moved many societies to create national databases or registries for their specialty. In societies with procedure-based specialties such as surgery, these databases will help with the care of patients by predicting prognosis, defining risk-factors, and aiding with the selection of patients who are the best candidates for these procedures. These databases eventually will also help to establish standards of care. The latter is rapidly growing in importance as governments attempt to create “pay-for-performance” programs in many of the surgical specialties. It is essential to create a database from which a specialty can provide accurate data and standards to its members, its patients, and third parties, such as regulatory bodies and agencies of re-numeration. Unfortunately, surgeons often only care for their patients in the short-term peri-operative period, typically lasting weeks to months; and therefore, the ability of surgeons to create databases with long-term follow-up has been limited. The introduction of “personal health information” into a surgical database, with the intention of linking with other societies or national databases that have long-term follow-up, can remedy this weakness. This article describes the investigation by one surgical society into the available national registries of death and examines their accuracy, accessibility, cost, and their suitability in respect to the goals of that society. The information gathered, the comparisons outlined, and the processes used to determine the best combination of indices of death for this society should be translatable and hopefully useful for other societies and registries who wish to empower their databases with long-term national data about mortality.


Corresponding author

Correspondence to: David L. S. Morales MD, Division of Congenital Heart Surgery, Texas Children’s Hospital, 6621 Fannin St, MC-WT 19345 H, Houston, TX 77030, United States of America. Tel: 832-826-1929; Fax: 832-825-1904; E-mail:


Hide All
1., accessed September through November 2007.
2. Bilgrad R. Special Assistant to the Director, Division of Vital Statistics, National Center for Health Statistics, (Hyattsville, MD: August – October 2007), phone interviews.
3., accessed September through November 2007.
4. Freedom of Information Act (FOIA, 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(3)).
5. Reshee M. Lead Social Security Insurance Analyst, Social Security Administration, Office of Research, Evaluation, and Statistics (Baltimore, MD: November 2007), phone interviews.
6.Schisterman, EF, Whitcomb, BW. Use of the Social Security Administration Death Master File for ascertainment of mortality status. Popul Health Metr 2004; 2: 2.
7.Cowper, DC, Kubal, JD, Maynard, C, Hynes, DM. A primer and comparative review of major U.S. mortality databases. Ann Epidemiol 2002; 12: 462468.
8.Buchanich, JM, Dolan, DG, Marsh, GM, Madrigano, J. Underascertainment of deaths using Social Security Records: a recommended solution to a little-known problem. Am J Epidemiol 2005; 162: 193194.
9., accessed September through November 2007.
10.Lash, TL, Silliman, RA. A comparison of the National Death Index and Social Security Administration databases to ascertain vital status. Epidemiology 2001; 12: 259261.
11. Orr E. Product Manager, National Technical Information Service (Springfield, VA: December 2007), phone interviews.



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed