Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-15T02:22:26.341Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Echocardiographic changes and impact on clinical management in pregnant women with heart disease

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2022

Karishma Patel ,
Lidija McGrath Open the ORCID record for Lidija McGrath [Opens in a new window] ,
Paola Roldan ,
Marshall Taunton ,
Kathleen Brookfield ,
Emmanuelle Paré  and
Abigail Khan Open the ORCID record for Abigail Khan [Opens in a new window]
Karishma Patel
Affiliation:
Oregon Health & Science University School of Medicine, Portland, OR, USA
Lidija McGrath
Affiliation:
Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
Paola Roldan
Affiliation:
Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
Marshall Taunton
Affiliation:
Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
Kathleen Brookfield
Affiliation:
Oregon Health & Science University School of Medicine, Portland, OR, USA
Emmanuelle Paré
Affiliation:
Division of Perinatology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
Abigail Khan*
Affiliation:
Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Abigail Khan, MD, MSCE, UHN 62, Knight Cardiovascular Institute, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR 97239, USA. Tel: +1 503-494-7400; Fax: +1 503-494-8550. E-mail: khaab@ohsu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background:

While guidelines recommend echocardiography for pregnant women with heart disease, there are limited data on its effect on clinical practice. In this study, we investigated pregnancy-associated echocardiographic changes and their impact on management.

Methods:

This was a retrospective study of pregnant women with heart disease followed at an academic medical centre from 2016 to 2020. Data on maternal intrapartum and postpartum echocardiograms were collected and the impact on management analysed.

Results:

421 echocardiograms in 232 pregnancies were included in the study. The most common cardiac diagnosis was CHD (60.8% of pregnancies), followed by cardiomyopathy (9.9%). The frequency of baseline echocardiographic abnormalities varied by diagnosis, with abnormal right ventricular systolic pressure being the most common (15.0% of pregnancies in CHD and 23.1% of pregnancies with cardiomyopathy). 39.2% of the 189 follow-up echocardiograms had a significant change from the prior study, with the most common changes being declines in right ventricular function (4.2%) or left ventricular function (3.7%), and increases in right ventricular systolic pressure (5.3%) and aortic size (21.2%). 17.8% of echocardiograms resulted in a clinical management change, with the most common change being shorter interval follow-up.

Conclusions:

Echocardiographic changes in pregnant women with heart disease are common, in particular increases in aortic size. Echocardiography results in changes in management in a small but significant proportion of patients. Further studies are needed to determine how other factors, including patient access and resource allocation, factor into the use of echocardiography during pregnancy.

Keywords

Echocardiographypregnancycardiovascular disease
Type
Original Article
Information
Cardiology in the Young , Volume 33 , Issue 3 , March 2023 , pp. 449 - 456
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Sanghavi, M, Rutherford, JD. Cardiovascular physiology of pregnancy. Circulation 2014; 130: 1003–1008.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silversides, CK, Grewal, J, Mason, J, et al. Pregnancy outcomes in women with heart disease: the CARPREG II study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018; 71: 2419–2430.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drenthen, W, Boersma, E, Balci, A, et al. Predictors of pregnancy complications in women with congenital heart disease. Eur Heart J 2010; 31: 2124–2132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mehta, LS, Warnes, CA, Bradley, E, et al. Cardiovascular considerations in caring for pregnant patients: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2020; 141: e884–e903.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Regitz-Zagrosek, V, Roos-Hesselink, JW, Bauersachs, J, et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiovascular diseases during pregnancy. Eur Heart J 2018; 39: 3165–3241.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marwick, TH. Can we justify the cost of echocardiography? Lessons from outcomes research. Eur J Echocardiogr 2005; 6: 155–163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petersen, SE, Friebel, R, Ferrari, V, et al. Recent trends and potential drivers of non-invasive cardiovascular imaging use in the United States of America and England. Front Cardiovasc Med 2020; 7: 617771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, P, ACCF/ASE/AHA/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCAI/SCCM/SCCT/SCMR. Appropriate use criteria for echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2011; 24: 229–267, 2011.Google Scholar
Savu, O, Jurcut, R, Giusca, S, et al. Morphological and functional adaptation of the maternal heart during pregnancy. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2012; 5: 289–297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adeyeye, VO, Balogun, MO, Adebayo, RA, et al. Echocardiographic assessment of cardiac changes during normal pregnancy among Nigerians. Clin Med Insights Cardiol 2016; 10: 157–162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Desai, DK, Moodley, J, Naidoo, DP. Echocardiographic assessment of cardiovascular hemodynamics in normal pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 104: 20–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bryg, RJ, Gordon, PR, Kudesia, VS, Bhatia, RK. Effect of pregnancy on pressure gradient in mitral stenosis. Am J Cardiol 1989; 63: 384–386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Samiei, N, Amirsardari, M, Rezaei, Y, et al. Echocardiographic evaluation of hemodynamic changes in left-sided heart valves in pregnant women with valvular heart disease. Am J Cardiol 2016; 118: 1046–1052.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Canobbio, MM, Warnes, CA, Aboulhosn, J, et al. Management of pregnancy in patients with complex congenital heart disease: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2017; 135: e50–e87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zoghbi, WA, Adams, D, Bonow, RO, et al. Recommendations for noninvasive evaluation of native valvular regurgitation: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography developed in collaboration with the society for cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2017; 30: 303–371.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baumgartner, H, Hung, J, Bermejo, J, et al. Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2009; 22: 1–23; quiz 101-102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shaw, LJ, Blankstein, R, Jacobs, JE, et al. Defining quality in cardiovascular imaging: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2017; 10: e000017.Google ScholarPubMed
Narula, N, Devereux, RB, Malonga, GP, Hriljac, I, Roman, MJ. Pregnancy-related aortic complications in women with marfan syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol 2021; 78: 870–879.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horiuchi, C, Kamiya, CA, Ohuchi, H, et al. Impact of pregnancy on aortic root in women with repaired conotruncal anomalies. Pediatr Cardiol 2019; 40: 1134–1143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldstein, SA, Evangelista, A, Abbara, S, et al. Multimodality imaging of diseases of the thoracic aorta in adults: from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging: endorsed by the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography and Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2015; 28: 119–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qaseem, A, Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta, I, Mustafa, RA, et al. Appropriate use of point-of-care ultrasonography in patients with acute dyspnea in emergency department or inpatient settings: a clinical guideline from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med 2021; 174: 985–993.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed