Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T00:58:48.463Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Linear equivalence of scattered metric spaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 May 2023

Jan Baars*
Affiliation:
971 Bukit Timah Road, 06-22 Floridian, 589647 Singapore, Singapore

Abstract

Let $\alpha < \omega _1$ be a prime component, and let $X$ and $Y$ be metric spaces. In [8], it was shown that if $C_p(X)$ and $C_p(Y)$ are linearly homeomorphic, then the scattered heights $\kappa (X)$ and $\kappa (Y)$ of $X$ and $Y$ satisfy $\kappa (X) \leq \alpha $ if and only if $\kappa (Y) \leq \alpha $. We will prove that this also holds if $C_p^*(X)$ and $C_p^*(Y)$ are linearly homeomorphic and that these results do not hold for arbitrary Tychonov spaces. We will also prove that if $C_p^*(X)$ and $C_p^*(Y)$ are linearly homeomorphic, then $\kappa (X) < \alpha $ if and only if $\kappa (Y) < \alpha $, which was shown in [9] for $\alpha = \omega $. This last statement is not always true for linearly homeomorphic $C_p(X)$ and $C_p(Y)$. We will show that if $\alpha = \omega ^{\mu }$ where $\mu < \omega _1$ is a successor ordinal, it is true, but for all other prime components, this is not the case. Finally, we will prove that if $C_p^*(X)$ and $C_p^*(Y)$ are linearly homeomorphic, then $X$ is scattered if and only if $Y$ is scattered. This result does not directly follow from the above results. We will clarify why the results for linearly homeomorphic spaces $C_p^*(X)$ and $C_p^*(Y)$ do require a different and more complex approach than the one that was used for linearly homeomorphic spaces $C_p(X)$ and $C_p(Y)$.

Type
Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Canadian Mathematical Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arhangel’skii, A. V., On linear homeomorphisms of function spaces . Dokl. Math. 25(1982), 852855.Google Scholar
Arhangel’skii, A. V., Topological function spaces, Mathematics and its Applications, 78, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baars, J., On the ${l}_p^{\ast }$ -equivalence of certain locally compact spaces . Topology Appl. 52(1993), 4357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baars, J., Function spaces on first countable paracompact spaces . Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. Math. 42(1994), no. 1, 2935.Google Scholar
Baars, J., On the ${l}_p^{\ast }$ -equivalence of metric spaces . Topology Appl. 298(2021), 107729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baars, J. and de Groot, J., An isomorphical classification of function spaces of zero-dimensional locally compact separable metric spaces . Comment. Math. Univ. Carolin. 29(1988), 577595.Google Scholar
Baars, J. and de Groot, J., On the l-equivalence of metric spaces . Fund. Math. 137(1991), 2543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baars, J. and de Groot, J., On topological and linear equivalence of certain function spaces, CWI-tract 86, Centre for Mathematics and Computer Science, Amsterdam, 1992.Google Scholar
Baars, J., de Groot, J., van Mill, J., and Pelant, J., An example of ${l}_p$ -equivalent spaces which are not ${l}_p^{\ast }$ -equivalent . Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 119(1993), 963969.Google Scholar
Baars, J., de Groot, J., and Pelant, J., Function spaces on completely metrizable spaces . Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 340(1993), 871883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baars, J. and van Mill, J., Function spaces and points in Čech-Stone remainders. Submitted for publication, 2023.Google Scholar
Baars, J., van Mill, J., and Tkachuk, V. V., A note on linear invariance of (pseudo)compact spaces . Quaestiones Mathematicae 46(2022), 16.Google Scholar
Bessaga, C. and Pelczyński, A., Spaces of continuous functions IV (on isomorphical classification of spaces of continuous functions) . Dokl. Math. 19(1960), 5362.Google Scholar
Dugundji, J., An extension of Tietze’s Theorem . Pacific J. Math. 1(1951), 353367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Mill, J., The infinite-dimensional topology of function spaces, North-Holland, 64, Gulf Professional Publishing, Oxford, 2002.Google Scholar
Semadeni, Z., Banach spaces of continuous functions, PWN, Warszawa, 1971.Google Scholar
Sierpiński, W., Cardinal and ordinal numbers, PWN, Warszawa, 1958.Google Scholar
Tkachuk, V. V., $A\,{C}_p$ -theory problem book – Topological and function spaces, Problem Books in Mathematics, Springer, Berlin, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tkachuk, V. V., $A\, {C}_p$ -theory problem book – Special features of function spaces, Problem Books in Mathematics, Springer, Berlin, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tkachuk, V. V., $A\, {C}_p$ -theory problem book – Compactness in function spaces, Problem Books in Mathematics, Springer, Berlin, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tkachuk, V. V., $A\, {C}_p$ -theory problem book – Functional equivalencies, Problem Books in Mathematics, Springer, Berlin, 2016.Google Scholar