Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-09T04:07:57.124Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Against A Posteriori Functionalism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Marc A. Moffett
Marc A. Moffett*
Affiliation:
College of Arts and Sciences, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY82071, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

There are two constraints on any functionalist solution to the Mind-Body Problem construed as an answer to the question, ‘What is the relationship between mental properties and relations (hereafter, simply mental properties) and physical properties and relations?’ The first constraint is that it must actually address the Mind-Body Problem and not simply redefine the debate in terms of other, more tractable, properties (e.g., the species-specific property of having human-pain). Such moves can be seen to be spurious by the very multiple-realizability intuitions that motivate functionalism in the first place. For, according to those intuitions, it is possible for a being to experience pain, have beliefs, etcetera, and yet not only to be of a different species, but to have an entirely different material constitution from human beings. Such intuitions imply that our ordinary mental concepts are not species-restricted.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy , Volume 40 , Issue 1 , March 2010 , pp. 83 - 106
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

A previous version of this paper was presented at the University of Wyoming. Thanks to George Bealer, John Bengson, Chad Charmichael, Franz-Peter Griesmaier, Dan Korman, Sydney Shoemaker, and two anonymous referees for helpful comments.

References

Barnett, David. 1998. ‘Is Water Necessarily Identical to H2O?’ Philosophical Studies 98: 99–112.Google Scholar
Barkow, J.H. Cosmides, L. & Tooby, J. eds. 1992. The Adapted Mind. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bealer, George. 1987. ‘The Philosophical Limits of Scientific Essentialism.’ Philosophical Perspectives 1: 289–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bealer, George. 1994. ‘The Rejection of the Identity Thesis.’ In The Mind-Body Problem: A Guide to the Current Debate, Warner, R. & Szubka, T. eds. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bealer, George. 1997. ‘Self-consciousness.’ Philosophical Review 106: 69–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bealer, George. 1998. ‘A Theory of Concepts and Concept Possession.’ In Concepts (Philosophical Issues, 9), Villanueva, E. ed. Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview.Google Scholar
Beebee, Helen. 2002. ‘Contingent Laws Rule.’ Analysis 62: 252–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, Alexander. 2001. ‘Necessarily, Salt Dissolves in Water.’ Analysis 67: 267–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, Alexander. 2002. ‘On Whether Some Laws Are Necessary.’ Analysis 62: 257–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Block, Ned. 1978. ‘Troubles with Functionalism.’ Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 9: 261–325.Google Scholar
Buller, David. 2005. Adapting Minds, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chalmers, David. 2004. ‘Epistemic Two-dimensional Semantics.’ Philosophical Studies 118: 153–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chalmers, David. 2005. ‘The Matrix as Metaphysics.’ In Philosophers Explore the Matrix, Grau, C. ed. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Culicover, Peter & Jackendoff, Ray. 1999. ‘The View from the Periphery: The English Correlative Conditions.’ Linguistic Inquiry 30: 543–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Brian. 1999. ‘Causal Powers and the Laws of Nature.’ In Causation and Laws of Nature, Sankey, H. ed. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Ellis, Brian. 2002. The Philosophy of Nature: A Guide to the New Essentialism. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Brian & Lierse, Caroline. 1994. ‘Dispositional Essentialism.’ Australasian Journal of Philosophy 72: 27–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elman, Jeffrey Bates, Elizabeth Johnson, Mark Karmiloff-Smith, Annette Parisi, Domenico & Plunkett, Kim. 1996. Rethinking Innateness: A Connectionist Perspective on Development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fales, Evan. 1993. ‘Are Causal Laws Contingent?’ In Ontology, Causality and Mind. Bacon, J. Campbell, K. & Reinhardt, L. eds. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry. 1983. The Modularity of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, Jerry. 1987. Psychosemantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghiselin, Michael. 1974. ‘A Radical Solution to the Species Problem.’ Systematic Zoology 23: 536–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Frank. & Pettit, Philip. 1993. ‘Folk Belief and Commonplace Belief.’ Mind & Language 8: 298–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Frank & Braddon-Mitchell, David. 1996. Philosophy of Mind and Cognition: An Introduction. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Korman, Daniel. 2005. ‘Law Necessitarianism and the Importance of Being Intuitive.’ Philosophical Quarterly 55: 649–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kripke, Saul. 1972. Naming and Necessity, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, David. 1972. ‘Psychophysical and Theoretical Identifications.’ Australasian Journal of Philosophy 50: 249–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, David. 1980. ‘Mad Pain and Martian Pain.’ In Readings in the Philosophy of Psychology, Volume I, Block, N. ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, David. 1983. ‘New Work for a Theory of Universals.’ Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61: 343–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markman, Ellen. 1989. Categorization and Naming in Children: Problems of Induction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
McGinn, Colin. 1991. The Problem of Consciousness, Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Menzel, Christopher. 1993. ‘The Proper Treatment of Predication in Fine-grained Intensional Logic.’ Philosophical Perspectives. 7: 61–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, Steven. 1997. How the Mind Works. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary. 1960. ‘Minds and machines.’ In Dimensions of Mind. Hook, S. ed. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary. 1975. ‘The Meaning of “Meaning”.’ In Language, Mind and Knowledge. Gunderson, K. ed. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, VII. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Ramsey, F. P. 1931. ‘Theories.’ In The Foundations of Mathematics. Braithwaite, R.B. ed. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Rey, Georges. 1997. Contemporary Philosophy of Mind. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Searle, John. 1992. The Rediscovery of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shoemaker, Sydney. 1980. ‘Causality and Properties.’ In Time and Cause. Inwagen, P. van. ed. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Shoemaker, Sydney. 1981. ‘Some Varieties of Functionalism.’ Philosophical Topics 12: 93–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shoemaker, Sydney. 1998. ‘Causal and Metaphysical Necessity.’ Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 79: 59–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shoemaker, Sydney. 1999. ‘Realization and Mental Causation.’ Proceedings of the 20th World Congress, Vol. IX: Philosophy of Mind. Bowling Green, OH: Philosophy Documentation Center. 23–31.Google Scholar
Swoyer, Chris. 1982. ‘The Nature of Natural Laws.’ Australasian Journal of Philosophy 60: 203–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, Michael. 1999. The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael. 2003. Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tooley, Michael. 1977. ‘The Nature of Laws.’ Canadian Journal of Philosophy 7: 667–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tooley, Michael. 1987. Causation: A Realist Approach. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Van Inwagen, Peter. 1998. ‘Modal Epistemology.’ Philosophical Studies 92: 67–84Google Scholar
Williamson, Timothy. 2000. Knowledge and Its Limits. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yablo, Stephen. 1992. ‘Mental Causation.’ Philosophical Review 101: 245–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar