Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-fwgfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T03:21:49.040Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Off on the Wrong Foot

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

R.M. Hare
R.M. Hare*
Affiliation:
Oxford University
Get access

Extract

Professor Foot's Hart Lecture, now published (1995), is largely devoted to an attack on people she calls ‘subjectivists’ and ‘noncognitivists', among whom she includes myself, although she is so good as to allow me, in a footnote, to reject the names. She seems to imply thereby that this is a mere matter of nomenclature or terminology. But in truth her use of these terms makes one suspect that she has not fully understood either the issues or what I have said about them.

It may therefore be useful to explain yet again why I reject these descriptions. I have done so already in a paper to a conference in Moscow which she heard, and to which she kindly refers (Hare 1993a). These explanations would not be important if she were the only person to be confused about this matter; but the confusions are so widespread, even among professional philosophers who should know better, and are so often taught to succeeding generations of students, that it is worth while to make yet another attempt to clear them up - though the confusions are so insidious that I have not much hope that they will ever be eradicated.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy Supplementary Volume , Volume 21: On the Relevance of Metaethics - New Essays on Metaethics , 1995 , pp. 67 - 77
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References*

Anscombe, G.E.M. (1981). Collected Philosophical Papers 3. Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar
Ayer, A.J. (1936). Language, Truth and Logic. GollanczGoogle Scholar
Ayer, A.J. (1949). “On the Analysis of Moral Judgements”, Horizon 20. Repr. in his Philosophical Essays. London: Macmillan, 1954Google Scholar
Brandt, R.B. (1979). A Theory of the Good and the Right, Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Foot, P.R. (1954). “When is Principle a Moral Principle?”, Ar. Soc. supp. 28Google Scholar
Foot, P.R. (1961). “Goodness and Choice”, Ar. Soc. supp. 35Google Scholar
Foot, P.R. (1995). “Does Moral Subjectivism Rest on a Mistake?”, Oxford J. of Legal St. 15Google Scholar
Geach, P.T. (1957). “Good and Evil”, Analysis 17Google Scholar
Hare, R.M. (1952). The Language of Morals. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Hare, R.M. (1957). “Geach: Good and Evil”, Analysis 17. Repr. in Hare 1972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hare, R.M. (1963). “Descriptivism”, Proc. of Br. Acad. 49. Repr. in Hare 1972Google Scholar
Hare, R.M. (1972). Essays on the Moral Concepts. London: MacmillanCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hare, R.M. (1975a). “Abortion and the Golden Rule”, Ph. and Pub. Aff. 4. Repr. in Hare 1993bGoogle Scholar
Hare, R.M. (1975b). “Euthanasia: a Christian View”, Philosophic Exchange 2. Repr. in 1992bGoogle Scholar
Hare, R.M. (1976). “Some Confusions about Subjectivity”. In Bricke, J. ed., Freedom and Morality, Lindley Lectures, U. of Kansas. Repr. in Hare 1989Google Scholar
Hare, R.M. (1981a). Moral Thinking. Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hare, R.M. (1981b). Review of Singer, P.The Expanding Circle. New Republic, 7 Feb.Google Scholar
Hare, R.M. (1985). “Philosophy and Practice: Some Issues about War and Peace”. In A.P., Griffiths ed., Philosophy and Practice. R. Inst. of Phil. Lectures. Cambridge University Press. Repr. in Hare 1989bGoogle Scholar
Hare, R.M. (1989a). Essays in Ethical Theory;. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Hare, R.M. (1989b). Essays on Political Morality. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Hare, R.M. (1989c). “A Kantian Approach to Abortion”, Social Theory and Practice 15. Repr. in 1993bCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hare, R.M. (1991). “Universal Prescriptivism”. In Singer, P.Companion to Ethics. Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar
Hare, R.M. (1992a). “Weakness of Will”. In Becker, L. ed., Encyclopedia of Ethics. GarlandGoogle Scholar
Hare, R.M. (1992b). Essays on Religion and Education. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Hare, R.M. (1993a). “Objective Prescriptions”. In Villanueva, E. ed., Naturalism and Normativity. Philosophical Issues 4. Ridgeview, CA: Atascadero. Also in Griffiths, A.P. ed., Ethics (R. Inst. of Phil. Lectures). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1993.Google Scholar
Hare, R.M. (1993b). Essays on Bioethics. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Hare, R.M. (1994). Methods of Bioethics: Some Defective Proposals, Monash Bioethics Review, 13. Repr. in Sumner, L.W. and J., Boyle eds., Philosophical Perspectives on Bioethics. Toronto: University of Toronto PressGoogle Scholar
Hare, R.M. (1996a) “Internalism and Externalism in Ethics”, In Proc. of 18th International Wittgenstein Congress, Kirchberg, 1994Google Scholar
Hare, R.M. (1996b). “Prescriptivism”. In E., Craig ed., Encyclopedia of Philosophy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. (1989). “Dispositional Theories of Value”. Ar. Soc. supp. 63Google Scholar
Singer, P. (1981). The Expanding Circle. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, C.L. (1945). Ethics and Language. New Haven: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar