Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T01:29:03.076Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Distortion of Normal Pituitary Structures in Sellar Pathologies on MRI

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2014

Burak Sade ,
Gérard Mohr  and
Jean Lorrain Vézina
Burak Sade
Affiliation:
Division of Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec Canada
Gérard Mohr
Affiliation:
Division of Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec Canada
Jean Lorrain Vézina
Affiliation:
Sir Mortimer B. Davis-Jewish General Hospital, McGill University and Department of Radiology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec Canada
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective:

This study was undertaken to assess the displacement patterns and shifts of the normal pituitary gland in sellar pathologies on MRI and to determine if the position of the bright spot (BS) represents a predicting factor for the position of the residual adenohypophysis (RAH) in pathological conditions.

Methods:

In a control group of 102 patients without any pituitary pathology, the presence of the BS was evaluated. In 100 patients with intra- or suprasellar pathologies, presence and respective topography of BS and RAH were scrutinized on MRI, according to lesion type, size, endocrine status and intra-operative findings in the surgical group.

Results:

The BS was visible in 91.2% of 102 cases in the control group, as compared to 75 of the 100 patients with sellar lesions. Location of RAH was identified in 58% of the patients, and RAH enhanced more than the lesion in all cases after contrast infusion. The RAH was identified in 65.3% of the 75 “BS positive” patients, as compared to 36% of the 25 “BS negative”. The normal residual gland was visualized intra-operatively in 63.5% of the 52 operated patients: in 37 “BS positive” patients, it was visualized intra-operatively in 81.1% and in 28 “RAH positive” patients, it was identified in 82.1%.

Conclusion:

The BS can be identified in the majority and RAH in more than half of the cases with pituitary lesions on MRI. Positions of both the BS and RAH help predict the location of the normal residual gland during surgery and, therefore, may contribute to preserving the pituitary function.

Type
Other
Information
Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences , Volume 31 , Issue 4 , November 2004 , pp. 467 - 473
Copyright
Copyright © The Canadian Journal of Neurological 2004

References

1. Colombo, N, Berry, I, Kucharczyk, J, et al. Posterior pituitary gland: appearance on MR images in normal and pathologic states. Radiology 1987; 165: 481–485.Google Scholar
2. Kucharczyk, J, Kucharczyk, W, Berry, I, et al. Histochemical characterization and functional significance of the hyperintense signal on MR images of the posterior pituitary. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1988; 9: 1079–1083.Google Scholar
3. Elster, AD. Modern imaging of the pituitary. Radiology 1993; 187: 1–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Elster, AD. Imaging of the sella: anatomy and pathology. Semin Ultrasound CTMR 1993; 14: 182–194.Google Scholar
5. Litt, AW, Kricheff, II. Magnetic resonance imaging of pituitary tumors. In: Cooper, PR, (Ed). Contemporary Diagnosis and Management of Pituitary Adenomas. Park Ridge: AANS, 1991: 1–19.Google Scholar
6. Mohr, G, Hardy, J, Comtois, R, Beauregard, H. Surgical management of giant pituitary adenomas. Can J Neurol Sci 1990; 17: 62–66.Google Scholar
7. Kucharczyk, W, Lenkinski, RE, Kucharczyk, J, Henkelman, RM. The effect of phospholipid vesicles on the NMR relaxation of water: an explanation for the MR appearance of the neurohypophysis? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1990; 11: 693–700.Google Scholar
8. Holder, CA, Elster, AD. Magnetization transfer imaging of the pituitary: further insights into the nature of the posterior ” bright spot”. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1997; 21: 171–174.Google Scholar
9. Brooks, BS, El Gammal, T, Allison, JD, Hoffman, WH. Frequency and variation of the posterior pituitary bright signal on MR images. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1989; 10: 943–948.Google Scholar
10. Bonneville, F, Narboux, Y, Cattin, F, et al. Preoperative location of the pituitary bright spot in patients with pituitary macroadenomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002; 23: 528–532.Google Scholar
11. Saeki, N, Hoshi, S, Sunada, S, et al. Correlation of high signal intensity of the pituitary stalk in macroadenoma and postoperative diabetes insipidus. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002; 23: 822–827.Google Scholar
12. Sato, N, Ishizaka, H, Yagi, H, Matsumoto, M, Endo, K. Posterior lobe of the pituitary in diabetes inspidus: dynamic MR imaging. Radiology 1993; 186: 357–360.Google Scholar
13. Tien, R, Kucharczyk, J, Kucharczyk, W. MR imaging of the brain in patients with diabetes insipidus. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1991; 12: 533–542.Google ScholarPubMed
14. Duvernoy, H. Le Cerveau Human. Paris: Springer, 1992: 34.Google Scholar
15. Gorczyca, W, Hardy, J. Microadenomas of the human pituitary and their vascularization. Neurosurgery 1988; 22: 1–6.Google Scholar
16. Bonneville, JF, Cattin, F, Gorczyca, W, Hardy, J. Pituitary microadenomas: early enhancement with dynamic CT-implications of arterial blood supply and potential importance. Radiology 1993; 187: 857–861.Google Scholar
17. Yuh, WT, Fisher, DJ, Nguyen, HD, et al. Sequential MR enhancement pattern in normal pituitary gland and in pituitary adenoma. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1994; 15: 101–108.Google Scholar
18. Finelli, DA, Kaufman, B. Varied microcirculation of pituitary adenomas at rapid, dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 1993; 189: 205–210.Google Scholar
19. Miki, Y, Matsuo, M, Nishisawa, S, et al. Pituitary adenomas and normal pituitary tissue: enhancement patterns on gadopentate-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 1990; 177:35–38.Google Scholar
20. Kelly, WM, Kucharczyk, W, Kucharczyk, J, et al. Posterior pituitary ectopia: an MR feature of pituitary dwarfism. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1988; 9: 453–460.Google Scholar
21. Maintz, D, Benz-Bohm, G, Gindele, A, et al: Posterior pituitary ectopia: another genetic etiology. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000; 21: 1116–1118.Google Scholar
22. Zuccoli, G, Ferrozzi, F, Trosio, A, Ubaldi, A, Ghizzoni, L. An unusual MR presentation of the neurohypophyseal “bright spot” in pituitary dwarfism. Clin Imaging 2000; 25: 9–11.Google Scholar
23. El Gammal, T, Brooks, BS, Hoffman, WH. MR imaging of the ectopic bright signal of posterior pituitary regeneration. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1989; 10: 323–328.Google Scholar
24. Rhoton, AL. Jr The sellar region. Neurosurgery 2002; 51 (suppl): 335–374.Google Scholar
25. Kleinschmidt-DeMasters, BK, Lillehei, KO, Stears, JC. The pathologic, surgical and MR spectrum of Rathke cleft cysts. Surg Neurol 1995; 44: 19–27.Google Scholar
26. Sumida, M, Uozumi, T, Mukada, K, et al. Rathke cleft cysts: correlation of enhanced MR and surgical findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1994; 15: 525–532.Google ScholarPubMed
27. De Monte, F, Harrison, RL, al-Mefty, O. Dislocation of the pituitary gland by sphenocavernous meningiomas. Surg Neurol 1997; 47:43–46.Google Scholar
28. Taylor, SL, Barakos, JA, Harsh, GR IV, Wilson, CB. Magnetic resonance imaging of tuberculum sellae meningiomas: preventing preoperative misdiagnosis as pituitary macroadenoma. Neurosurgery 1992; 31: 621–627.Google Scholar
29. Vladyka, V, Liscak, R, Novotny, J, Marek, J, Jezkova, J. Radiation tolerance of functioning pituitary tissue in gamma knife surgery for pituitary adenomas. Neurosurgery 2003; 52: 309–317.Google Scholar
30. Wowra, B, Stummer, W. Efficacy of gamma knife radiosurgery for nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas: a quantitative follow up with magnetic resonance imaging-based volumetric analysis. J Neurosurg 2002; 97 (Suppl 5): 429–432.Google Scholar
31. Hardy, J. Transsphenoidal microsurgery of the normal and pathological pituitary. Clin Neurosurg 1969; 16: 185–217.Google Scholar
32. Mason, RB, Nieman, LK, Doppman, JL, Oldfield, EH. Selective excision of adenomas originating in or extending into the pituitary stalk with preservation of pituitary function. J Neurosurg 1997; 87: 343–351.Google Scholar