Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-t6hkb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T22:31:02.848Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Splitting and Decomposition by Regressive Sets, II

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

T. G. McLaughlin
T. G. McLaughlin*
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Urbana, III
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In (3), Dekker drew attention to an analogy between (a) the relationship of the recursive sets to the recursively enumerable sets, and (b) the relationship of the retraceable sets to the regressive sets. As was to be expected, this analogy limps in some respects. For example, if a number set α is split by a recursive set, then it is decomposed by a pair of recursively enumerable sets; whereas, as we showed in (6, Theorem 2), α may be split by a retraceable set and yet not decomposable (in a liberal sense of the latter term) by a pair of regressive sets. The result for recursive and recursively enumerable sets, of course, follows from the trivial fact that the complement of a recursive set is recursive.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Mathematics , Volume 19 , 1967 , pp. 291 - 311
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 1967

References

1. Appel, K. I., No recursively enumerable set is the union of finitely many immune retraceable sets, to appear.Google Scholar
2. Appel, K. I. and McLaughlin, T. G., On properties of regressive sets, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 115 (1965), 83–93.Google Scholar
3. Dekker, J. C. E., Infinite series of isols, Proc. Symposia in Pure Math., 5 (1962), 77–96.Google Scholar
4. Dekker, J. C. E. and Myhill, J., Retraceable sets, Can. J. Math., 10 (1958), 357–373.Google Scholar
5. McLaughlin, T. G., Some remarks on extensibility, confluence of paths, branching properties, and index sets, for certain recursively enumerable graphs, to appear.Google Scholar
6. McLaughlin, T. G., Splitting and decomposition by regressive sets, Michigan Math. J., 12 (1965), 499–505.Google Scholar
7. McLaughlin, T. G., Co-immune retraceable sets, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc., 71 (1965), 523–525.Google Scholar
8. Sacks, G. E., Degrees of unsolvability, Ann. Math. Study No. 55 (Princeton, 1963).Google Scholar