Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T19:18:21.764Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Residual Spectra of Split Classical Groups and their Inner Forms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Neven Grbac*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Rijeka, Omladinska 14, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia, e-mail: neven.grbac@math.uniri.hr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper is concerned with the residual spectrum of the hermitian quaternionic classical groups $G_{n}^{\prime }$ and $H_{n}^{\prime }$ defined as algebraic groups for a quaternion algebra over an algebraic number field. Groups $G_{n}^{\prime }$ and $H_{n}^{\prime }$ are not quasi-split. They are inner forms of the split groups $\text{S}{{\text{O}}_{4n}}$ and $\text{S}{{\text{p}}_{4n}}$. Hence, the parts of the residual spectrum of $G_{n}^{\prime }$ and $H_{n}^{\prime }$ obtained in this paper are compared to the corresponding parts for the split groups $\text{S}{{\text{O}}_{4n}}$ and $\text{S}{{\text{p}}_{4n}}$.

Keywords

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 2012

References

[1] Arthur, J., Intertwining operators and residues. I. Weighted characters. J. Funct. Anal. 84(1989), no. 1, 19–84.Google Scholar
[2] Arthur, J., An introduction to the trace formula. In: Harmonic Analysis, the Trace Formula and Shimura Varieties. Clay Mathematics Proceedings 4, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2005, pp. 1–263.Google Scholar
[3] Arthur, J. and Clozel, L., Simple Algebras, Base Change, and the Advanced Theory of the Trace Formula. Annals of Mathematics Studies 120, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1989.Google Scholar
[4] Aubert, A.- M., Dualité dans le groupe de Grothendieck de la catégorie des représentations lisses de longueur finie d’un groupe réductif p-adique. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 347(1995), 2179–2189 (and “Erratum.” Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 348(1996), 4687–4690).Google Scholar
[5] Casselman, W. and Shahidi, F., On irreducibility of standard modules for generic representations. Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup. 31(1998), no. 4, 561–589.Google Scholar
[6] Deligne, P., Kazhdan, D., and Vignéras, M. F., Représentations des algèbres centrales simples p-adiques. In: Representations of Reductive Groups over a Local Field. Herman, Paris, 1984, pp. 33–117.Google Scholar
[7] Gelbart, S. and Jacquet, H., Forms of GL(2) from the analytic point of view. In: Automorphic Forms, Representations and L-Functions. Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. 33, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1979, pp. 213–251 Google Scholar
[8] Grbac, N., On the residual spectrum of hermitian quaternionic inner form of SO8. To appear in Glasnik Mat.Google Scholar
[9] Grbac, N., Correspondence between the residual spectra of rank two split classical groups and their innter forms. In: Functional Analysis IX. Various Publ. Ser. 48, University of Aarhus, 2007, pp. 4457.Google Scholar
[10] Grbac, N., The residual spectrum of GLn over a division algebra. Appendix to A. I. Badulescu, “Global Jacques–Langlands correspondence, multiplicity one and classification of automorphic representations.” Invent. Math. 172(2008), no. 2, 383–438.Google Scholar
[11] Grbac, N., The residual spectrum of an inner form of Sp8 supported in the minimal parabolic subgroup. To appear in Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.Google Scholar
[12] Hanzer, M., Unitary dual of the Hermitian quaternionic group of the split rank 2. Pacific J. Math. 226(2006), 1005–1034.Google Scholar
[13] Jacquet, H., Automorphic Forms on GL2. II. Lecture Notes in Mathematics 278, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1972.Google Scholar
[14] Jacquet, H., Principal L-functions of the linear group. In: Automorphic Forms, Representations and L-Functions. Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. 33, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1979, pp. 63–86.Google Scholar
[15] Jacquet, H. and Langlands, R. P., Automorphic Forms on GL2, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 114, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1970.Google Scholar
[16] Jacquet, H., Piatetskii-Shapiro, I. I., and Shalika, J. A., Rankin–Selberg convolutions. Amer. J. Math. 105(1983), no. 2, 367–464.Google Scholar
[17] Kim, H. H., The residual spectrum of Sp4. Compositio Math. 99(1995), no. 2, 129–151.Google Scholar
[18] Kim, H. H., The residual spectrum of G2. Canad. J. Math. 48(1996), no. 6, 1245–1272.Google Scholar
[19] Kim, H. H., Langlands–Shahidi method and poles of automorphic L-functions: Application to exterior square L-functions. Canad. J. Math. 51(1999), no. 4, 835–849.Google Scholar
[20] Kim, H. H., Langlands–Shahidi method and poles of automorphic L-functions. II. Israel J. Math. 117(2000), 261–284.Google Scholar
[21] Kim, H. H., Residual spectrum of odd orthogonal groups. Internat. Math. Res. Notices (2001), no. 17, 873–906.Google Scholar
[22] Kon-No, T., The residual spectrum of U(2, 2). Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 350(1998), no. 4, 1285–1358.Google Scholar
[23] Langlands, R. P., On the Functional Equations Satisfied by Eisenstein Series. Lecture Notes in Mathematics 544, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1976.Google Scholar
[24] Moeglin, C., Orbites unipotentes et spectre discret non ramifié. Compositio Math. 77(1991), no. 1, 1–54.Google Scholar
[25] Moeglin, C., Représentations unipotentes et formes automorphes de carré intégrable. Forum Math. 6(1994), no. 6, 651–744.Google Scholar
[26] Moeglin, C., Conjectures sur le spectre résiduel. J. Math. Soc. Japan 53(2001), no. 2, 395–427.Google Scholar
[27] Moeglin, C. and Waldspurger, J.-L., Le spectre résiduel de GL(n) Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup. 22(1989), no. 4, 605–674.Google Scholar
[28] Moeglin, C. and Waldspurger, J.-L., Spectral Decomposition and Eisenstein Series. Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics 113, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
[29] Muić, G., The unitary dual of p-adic G2. Duke Math. J. 90(1997), no. 3, 465–493.Google Scholar
[30] Muić, G., Some results on square integrable representations: Irreducibility of standard representations. Internat. Math. Res. Notices (1998), no. 14, 705–726.Google Scholar
[31] Muić, G., A proof of Casselman–Shahidi's conjecture for quasi-split classical groups. Canad. Math. Bull. 44(2001), no. 3, 298–312.Google Scholar
[32] Muić, G., On certain classes of unitary representations for split classical groups. Canad. J. Math. 59(2007), no. 1, 148–185.Google Scholar
[33] Muić, G., and Savin, G., Complementary series for Hermitian quaternionic groups. Canad. Math. Bull. 43(2000), no. 1, 90–99.Google Scholar
[34] Shahidi, F., On certain L-functions. Amer. J. Math. 103(1981), no. 2, 297–355.Google Scholar
[35] Shahidi, F., A proof of Langlands’ conjecture on Plancherel measures; Complementary series of p-adic groups. Ann. of Math. 132(1990), no. 2, 273–330.Google Scholar
[36] Speh, B., Unitary representations of GL(n, R) with nontrivial (g, K)-cohomology. Invent. Math. 71(1983), no. 3, 443–465.Google Scholar
[37] Schneider, P. and Stuhler, U., Representation theory and sheaves on the Bruhat–Tits building. Inst. Hautes. Études Sci. Publ. Math. (1997), no. 95, 97–191.Google Scholar
[38] Tadić, M., Classification of unitary representations in irreducible representations of general linear group (non-Archimedean case). Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup. 19(1986), no. 3, 335–382.Google Scholar
[39] Tadić, M., Induced representations of GL(n, A) for p-adic division algebras A. J. Reine Angew. Math. 405(1990), 48–77.Google Scholar
[40] Tate, J., Fourier analysis in number fields and Hecke's zeta-functions. In: Algebraic Number Theory, Thompson, Washington, D. C., 1967.Google Scholar
[41] Vogan, D., Gelfand–Kirillov dimension for Harish-Chandra modules. Invent. Math. 48(1978), no. 1, 75–98.Google Scholar
[42] Zhang, Y., The holomorphy and nonvanishing of normalized local intertwining operators. Pacific J. Math. 180(1997), no. 2, 385–398.Google Scholar
[43] Žampera, S., The residual spectrum of the group of type G2. J. Math. Pures Appl. 76(1997), no. 9, 805–835.Google Scholar