Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T06:26:51.492Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Unions of Metrizable Subspaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

E. K. Van Douwen ,
D. J. Lutzer ,
J. Pelant  and
G. M. Reed
E. K. Van Douwen
Affiliation:
Ohio University, Athens, Ohio
D. J. Lutzer
Affiliation:
Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas
J. Pelant
Affiliation:
Institute of Mathematics, ČSAV Prague, Czechoslovakia
G. M. Reed
Affiliation:
Institute of Mathematics, ČSAV Prague, Czechoslovakia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In this paper we study the question “which generalized metric spaces can be written as the union of k (closed) metrizable subspaces, where k is a cardinal number with k ≤ c?“ Questions of this type first arose in [16] where J. Nagata asked for examples of certain generalized metric spaces which could not be written as the union of countably many closed metrizable subspaces. Using Baire Category arguments, Fitzpatrick provided the required examples in [12]. We begin this paper by sharpening Fitzpatrick's examples, showing in Section 2 that there is a Moore space which is not the union of countably many metrizable subspaces of any kind. Then in Section 3 we present a positive result, proving that any cr-space, and a fortiori any Moore space, can be written as the union of c = 2ω0 closed metrizable subspaces.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Mathematics , Volume 32 , Issue 1 , 01 February 1980 , pp. 76 - 85
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 1980

References

1. Aarts, j. and Lutzer, D., Completeness properties designed for recognizing Baire spaces, Dissertations Math. CXVI (1974).Google Scholar
2. Arhangel'skiï, A., Some metrization theorems, Uspehi Mat. Nau. 18 (1963), 139–145 (Russian).Google Scholar
3. Aull, C., Topological spaces with a a-point-finite base, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 29 (1971), 411–416.Google Scholar
4. Bennett, H., On quasi-developable spaces, Gen. Top. Appl. 1 (1971), 253–261.Google Scholar
5. Bennett, H. and Lutzer, D., A note on weak 6-refinability, Gen. Top. Appl. 2 (1972), 49–54.Google Scholar
6. Burke, D. and Lutzer, D., Recent advances in the theory of generalized metric spaces, Proc. Memphis State Topology Conf., Lecture Notes in Pure and Applied Mathematics, 24 (Marcel Dekker, 1977), 1–70.Google Scholar
7. van Doren, K., Closed, continuous images of complete metric spaces, Fund. Math. 80 (1973), 47–50.Google Scholar
8. van Douwen, E. and Lutzer, D., On the classification of stationary sets, Michigan Math. J. 26 (1979), 47–64.Google Scholar
9. Engelking, R., General topology (Polish Scientific Publishers, 1977).Google Scholar
10. Engelking, R., Heath, R., and Michael, E., Topological well-ordering and continuous selections, Inventiones Math. 6 (1968), 150–158.Google Scholar
11. Engelking, R. and Lutzer, D., Paracompactness in ordered spaces, Fundamenta Math. 94 (1976).Google Scholar
12. Fitzpatrick, B., Some topologically complete spaces, Gen. Top. Appl. 1 (1971), 101–103.Google Scholar
13. Faber, M., Maurice, M., and Wattel, E., Order pre-images under one-to-one mappings, in Theory of Sets and Topology (Berlin, 1972), 109-119.Google Scholar
14. Hajnal, A. and Juhäsz, I., On spaces in which every small subspace is metrizable, Bull. Polish Acad. Sci. 24 (1976), 727–731.Google Scholar
15. Lutzer, I., On generalized ordered spaces, Dissertationes Math. 89 (1971).Google Scholar
16. Nagata, J., Some problems on generalized metric spaces, Proc. Emory Univ. Topology Conference (March, 1970), 63–70.Google Scholar
17. Nagami, K., E-spaces, Fundamenta Math. 65 (1969), 169–192.Google Scholar
18. Worrell, J. and Wicke, H., Characterizations of developable topological spaces, Can. J. Math. 17 (1965), 820–830.Google Scholar