Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Is English resumption different in appositive relative clauses?

  • Sara S. Loss (a1) and Mark Wicklund (a2)

Abstract

Resumptive pronouns are produced in English in unguarded speech in restrictive relative clauses and appositive relative clauses. However, numerous studies have found that resumptive pronouns in restrictive relative clauses are not acceptable. To our knowledge, no studies have examined the acceptability of resumptive pronouns in appositive relative clauses, despite hints in the literature that they may be more acceptable in appositive than in restrictive relative clauses. This article fills that gap. We found that resumptive pronouns were rated as more natural in appositive relative clauses than in restrictive relative clauses. These findings may be due to which currently undergoing a reanalysis from a relative pronoun to a solely connective word, as has been suggested in the literature. A small-scale corpus search also reveals that appositive relative clauses with resumptive pronouns are increasing in American English.

Dans le langage familier, les pronoms résomptifs se manifestent, en anglais, dans des clauses relatives restrictives et des clauses relatives appositives. Cependant, de nombreuses études ont révélé que les pronoms résomptifs dans les clauses relatives restrictives ne sont pas acceptables. À notre connaissance, aucune étude n'a examiné l'acceptabilité des pronoms résomptifs dans les clauses relatives appositives, bien que certains auteurs laissent entendre qu'ils sont plus acceptables dans les appositives que dans les restrictives. Le présent article comble cette lacune. Nous avons en effet constaté que les pronoms résomptifs sont perçus comme étant plus naturels dans les clauses relatives appositives que dans les restrictives. Ce phénomène pourrait s'expliquer si, comme le veulent certaines études, which est en voie de réanalyse, devenant un mot purement conjonctif au lieu d'un pronom relatif. Une recherche de corpus à petite échelle révèle également que les clauses relatives appositives avec pronom résomptif sont en croissance dans l'anglais américain.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Footnotes

Hide All

We would like to sincerely thank the anonymous reviewers for their very thoughtful and helpful comments on an earlier draft of this article. We would also like to thank Daniel Ezra Johnson for talking about statistics with us. Of course, all errors are our own.

Footnotes

References

Hide All
Ackerman, Lauren, Frazier, Michael, and Yoshida, Masaya. 2018. Resumptive pronouns can ameliorate illicit island extractions. Linguistic Inquiry 49(4): 847859.
Alexopoulou, Theodora, and Keller, Frank. 2007. Locality, cyclicity and resumption: At the interface between the grammar and the human sentence processor. Language 83: 110160.
Arnold, Doug. 2004. Non-restrictive relative clauses in construction-based HPSG. In Proceedings of HPSG-04, the 11th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, Leuven, ed. Muller, Stefan, 2747. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Arnold, Doug. 2007. Non-restrictive relatives are not orphans. Journal of Linguistics 43(2): 271309.
Asudeh, Ash. 2012. The logic of pronominal resumption. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar. 2007. Intonation units and actions – evidence from everyday interaction. International Pragmatics Association, Göteborg 8: 13.
Bates, Douglas, Maechler, Martin, Bolker, Ben, and Walker, Steve. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67(1): 148.
Beltrama, Andrea, and Xiang, Ming. 2016. Unacceptable but comprehensible: The facilitation effect of resumptive pronouns. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 1(1): 29. 1–24.
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan, and Finegan, Edward. 1999. Grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Longman.
Brady, Tom. 2011. Radio interview, November 14, 2011. WEEI-AM, Boston.
Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA). <http://corpus.byu.edu/coca/>. Accessed June 7, 2017.
Cann, Ronnie, Kaplan, Tami, and Kempson, Ruth. 2005. Data at the grammar-pragmatics interface: The case of resumptive pronouns in English. Lingua 115(11): 15511577.
Chomsky, Noam. 1977. On Wh-movement. In Formal syntax, ed. Culicover, Peter, Wasow, Thomas, and Akmajian, Adrian, 71132. New York: Academic Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 1991. Some notes on economy of derivation and representation. Anuario del Seminario de Filología Vasca “Julio de Urquijo”, 5382.
Daalder, Saskia. 1989. Continuative relative clauses. Sprechen und hören: Akten des 23. Linguistischen Kolloquiums, ed. Reiter, Norbert, 195207. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Dehé, Nicole. 2007. The relation between syntactic and prosodic parenthesis. Parentheticals 12: 261284.
Dehé, Nicole. 2009. Clausal parentheticals, intonational phrasing, and prosodic theory. Journal of Linguistics 45(3): 569615.
Del Gobbo, Francesca. 2007. On the syntax and semantics of appositive relative clauses. Parentheticals 106: 173201.
Demirdache, Hamida Khadiga. 1991. Resumptive chains in restrictive relatives, appositives and dislocation structures. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Emonds, Joseph. 1976. A transformational approach to English syntax. New York: Academic Press.
Emonds, Joseph. 1979. Appositive relatives have no properties. Linguistic Inquiry 10(2): 211243.
Erteschik-Shir, Nomi. 1992. Resumptive pronouns in islands. In Island constraints: Theory, acquisition, and processing, ed. Goodluck, Helen and Rochemont, Michael, 89108. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Espinal, M. Teresa. 1991. The representation of disjunct constituents. Language 67(4): 726762.
Fabb, Nigel. 1990. The difference between English restrictive and nonrestrictive relative clauses. Journal of Linguistics 26(1): 5777.
Ferreira, Fernanda, and Swets, Benjamin. 2005. The production and comprehension of resumptive pronouns in relative clause “island” contexts. In Twenty-first century psycholinguistics: Four cornerstones, ed. Cutler, Anne, 263278. Malway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Gundel, Jeanette K., Hedberg, Nancy, and Zacharski, Ron. 1993. Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language 69(2): 274307.
Han, Chung-hye, Elouazizi, Noureddine, Galeano, Christina, Görgulu, Emrah, Hedberg, Nancy, Hinnell, Jennifer, Jeffrey, Meghan, Kim, Kyeong-min, and Kirby, Susannah. 2012. Processing strategies and resumptive pronouns in English. In Proceedings of the 30th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, ed. Arnett, Nathan and Bennett, Ryan, 153161. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Heestand, Dustin, Xiang, Ming, and Polinsky, Maria. 2011. Resumption still does not rescue islands. Linguistic Inquiry 42(1): 138152.
Henry, Alison. 2005. Non-standard dialects and linguistic data. Lingua 115(11): 15991617.
Hofmeister, Philip, and Norcliffe, Elisabeth. 2013. Does resumption facilitate sentence comprehension? in The core and periphery: Data-driven on syntax inspired by Ivan A. Sag, ed. Hofmeister, Philip and Norcliffe, Elisabeth, 225246. Stanford: CSLI publications.
Huddleston, Rodney, and Pullum, Geoffrey K.. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Keffala, Bethany. 2013. Resumption and gaps in English relative clauses: Relative acceptability creates an illusion of “saving”. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 37(1), ed. Cathcart, Chundra, Chen, I-Hsuan, Finley, Greg, Kang, Shinae, Sandy, Clare S., and Stickles, Elise, 140–154. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistic Society.
Kroch, Anthony S. 1981. On the role of resumptive pronouns in amnestying island constraint violations. In Papers from the Regional Meeting. Chicago Linguistics Society, Chicago, Illinois 17: 125–135.
Langendoen, D. Terence. 1970. Essentials of English grammar. New York: Holt McDougal.
Loock, Rudy. 2007. “Are you a good which or a bad which?” The relative pronoun as a plain connective. In Connectives as discourse landmarks, ed. Celle, Agnes and Huart, Ruth, 7187. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
McCloskey, James. 2006. Resumption. In Blackwell companion to syntax, ed. Everaert, Martin and van Riemsdijk, Henk, 94115. Oxford: Blackwell.
McDaniel, Dana, and Cowart, Wayne. 1999. Experimental evidence for a minimalist account of English resumptive pronouns. Cognition 70(2): B15B24.
Morgan, Adam M., and Wagers, Matthew W.. 2018. English resumptive pronouns are more common where gaps are less acceptable. Linguistic Inquiry 49(4), 861876.
Polinsky, Maria, Clemens, Lauren Eby, Morgan, Adam Milton, Xiang, Ming, and Heestand, Dustin. 2013. Resumption in English. In Experimental syntax and island effects, ed. Sprouse, Jon and Hornstein, Norbert, 341362. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Potts, Christopher. 2002. The lexical semantics of parenthetical-as and appositive-which. Syntax 5(1): 5588.
Potts, Christopher. 2005. The logic of conventional implicatures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Prince, Ellen. 1990. Syntax and discourse: A look at resumptive pronouns. In Proceedings of the 16 th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, ed. Kira Hall, Jean-Pierre Koenig, Michael Meacham, Sondra Reinman, and Laurel A. Sutton, 482–497. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society
Rizzi, Luigi. 1990. Relativized minimality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Rockmore, Dan. 2014. What's missing from The Imitation Game? The New Yorker. <https://www.newyorker.com/tech/elements/imitation-game-alan-turing>. Accessed May 12, 2019.
Ross, John R. 1967. Constraints on variables in syntax. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. [Published as Infinite syntax! 1986. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.]
Sells, Peter. 1984. Syntax and semantics of resumptive pronouns. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Sells, Peter. 1985. Anaphora with which. Ms. Stanford: CSLI.
Shlonsky, Ur. 1992. Resumptive pronouns as a last resort. Linguistic Inquiry 23(3): 438468.

Keywords

Is English resumption different in appositive relative clauses?

  • Sara S. Loss (a1) and Mark Wicklund (a2)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed