Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-pfhbr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T05:35:46.596Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Race, Justice, and the Production of Knowledge: A Critical Realist Consideration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2014

Jon Frauley
Jon Frauley
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, Queen's University, Kingston (Ontario) K7L 3N6Canada, 9JFF@post.queensu.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The texts discussed illustrate general methodological and pedagogical problems faced by the social sciences. Because of their illustrative nature each of these texts makes a significant contribution to our understanding of how it is that social scientists conceive of and deploy ‘race’ as an analytic category and how this impacts on the production of knowledge about crime control and social justice. In this way, the texts are telling in terms of how analytic categories, more generally, are treated in teaching and research. Through a comparative approach this essay takes three recent texts as a vehicle to argue that the consideration of epistemological issues stemming from the employment of central analytic categories cannot be avoided and that attempts to do so yield a passive rather than active engagement with the object of analysis. Moreover, passive approaches do not serve to represent a critically engaged, social scientific enquiry.

Résumé

Les textes à l'étude illustrent des problèmes méthodologiques et pédagogiques généraux considérés par les sciences sociales. En tant qu'exemples illustratifs, chacun de ces textes contribue de manière significative à notre compréhension de la façon dont les sociologues conçoivent et déploient la «race» comme catégorie analytique et comment cela influe sur la production des connaissances au sujet du contrôle de la criminalité et de la justice sociale. Ainsi, les textes montrent, en général, comment des catégories analytiques sont traités dans l'enseignement et la recherche. Adoptant une approche comparative à partir de trois textes récents, cet essai pose qu'on ne peut éviter de considérer les enjeux épistémologiques provenant de l'emploi de catégories analytiques centrales et que les tentatives de le faire mènent à un engagement passif plutôt qu'actif avec l'objet de l'analyse. Au surplus, des approches passives ne servent guère une enquête critique en sciences sociales.

Type
Review Essays/Notes critiques
Information
Canadian Journal of Law and Society / La Revue Canadienne Droit et Société , Volume 19 , Issue 1 , April 2004 , pp. 177 - 197
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Law and Society Association 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Carter, B., Realism and Racism: Concepts of Race in Sociological Research (New York: Routledge, 2000)Google Scholar; Chan, W. and Mirchandani, K., eds., Crimes of Colour: Racialization and the Criminal Justice System in Canada (Peterborough: Broadview Press, 2002)Google Scholar; Neugebauer, R., ed., Criminal Injustice: Racism in the Criminal Justice System (Toronto: Canadian Scholar's Press, 2000).Google Scholar

2 Bhaskar, R., A Realist Theory of Science (Leeds: Leeds Books Ltd, 1975)Google Scholar; Bhaskar, R., The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences (Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press, 1979).Google Scholar See also Collier, A., Critical Realism: An Introduction to Roy Bhaskar's Philosophy (New York: Verso, 1994)Google Scholar; Lopez, L. and Potter, G., eds., After Postmodernism: An Introduction to Critical Realism (New York: Arnione Press, 2001)Google Scholar; Archer, M. et al. eds., Critical Realism: Essential Readings (New York: Routledge, 1998).Google Scholar

3 Carter, supra note 1 at 64.

4 Ibid. at 80.

5 Ibid. See also Woodiwiss, A., The Visual in Social Theory (New York: Athlone Press, 2001)Google Scholar and Sayer, A., Realism and Social Science (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6 See Woodiwiss, ibid.

7 Ibid.

8 Benton, T., Philosophical Foundations of the Three Sociologies (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1977)Google Scholar; Keat, R. and Urry, J., Social Theory as Science (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1975)Google Scholar; Outhwaite, W., “Toward a Realist Perspective” in Morgan, G., ed., Beyond Method: Strategies of Social Research (Beverly Hills: Sage, 1983) 321.Google Scholar

9 Archer, M., Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach (New York: Cambridge UP, 1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Layder, D., The Realist Image in Social Science (London: Macmillan, 1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Sayer, A., Method in Social Science: A Realist Approach, 2d ed. (New York: Routledge, 1992)Google Scholar; Sayer, supra note 5.

10 Cain, M., “Realist Philosophy and Standpoint Epistemologies or Feminist Criminology as a Successor Science” in Gelsthorpe, L. and Morris, A., eds., Feminist Perspectives in Criminology (Bristol, PA: Open UP, 1990) 124 Google Scholar; M.Cain, “Realism, Feminism, Methodology, and Law” (1986) 14:3–4 Int'l J. Soc. L. 255; Kerruish, V., Jurisprudence as Ideology (New York: Routledge, 1991)Google Scholar; Norrie, A., Law, Ideology and Punishment (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Norrie, A., Crime, Reason and History (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1993)Google Scholar; Norrie, A., “The Limits of Justice: Finding Fault in the Criminal Law” (1996) 59 Mod. L. Rev. 540 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Norrie, A., “Between Structure and Difference: Law's Relationality” in Archer, M. et al. eds., Critical Realism: Essential Readings (New York: Routledge, 1998) 723 Google Scholar; Palmer, J. and Pearce, F., “Legal Discourse and State Power: Foucault and the Juridical Relation” (1983) 11:4 Int'l J. Soc. L. 361 Google Scholar; Pearce, F. and Tombs, S., Toxic Capitalism: Corporate Crime and the Chemical Industry (Brookfield, VT: Ashgate, 1998)Google Scholar; Pearce, F. and Tombs, S., “Hegemony, Risk and Governance: ‘Social Regulation’ and the American Chemical Industry” (1996) 25:3 Economy & Society 428 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Pearce, F., The Radical Durkheim (Winchester, MA: Unwin Hymen, 1989)Google Scholar in particular the chapter entitled “The State, Law and Order in Complex Societies” at 179; Woodiwiss, A., Social Theory After Post-modernism: Rethinking Production, Law, and Class (London: Pluto Press, 1990)Google Scholar; Woodiwiss, A., Globalisation, Human Rights and Labour Law in Pacific Asia (Cambridge: UP, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

11 Benton, supra note 8; Keat and Urry, supra note 8; Pearce, F., Crimes of the Powerful: Marxism, Crime and Deviance (London: Pluto Press, 1976)Google Scholar; Sayer, supra note 5.

12 Carter, supra note 1 at 19.

13 Ibid.

14 Supra note 9.

15 Carter, supra note 1 at 19.

16 Ibid.

17 Ibid. at 20 [references omitted].

18 Ibid.

19 Ibid.

20 Ibid.

21 For an overview see Hunt, A., “Living Dangerously on the Deconstructive Edge” (1988) 26 Osgoode Hall L.J. 867 Google Scholar; Hunt, A. “The Big Fear: Law Confronts Postmodernism” (1990) 35 McGill L.J. 507.Google Scholar

22 See Currie, D., MacLean, B. and Milovanovic, D., “Three Traditions of Critical Justice Inquiry: Class, Gender, and Discourse” in Currie, D. and MacLean, B., eds., Re-thinking the Administration of Justice (Halifax: Fernwood, 1992) 3.Google Scholar

23 See Woodiwiss, supra note 5.

24 Foucault, M. “Two Lectures” in Gordon, C., ed., Power/Knowledge (New York: Pantheon, 1980) 78 at 81.Google Scholar

25 See J. Lopez and G. Potter, supra note 2; F. Pearce and A. Woodiwiss, “Reading Foucault as a Realist” in J. Lopez and G. Potter, supra note 2 at 51; Sayer, supra note 5; Stones, R., Sociological Reasoning: Towards a Past-modern Sociology (London: Macmillan, 1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Woodiwiss (1990), supra note 10; Woodiwiss, supra note 5.

26 Eagleton, T., Ideology: An Introduction (New York: Verso, 1991)Google Scholar; Hall, S., “The West and the Rest: Discourse and Power” in Hall, S. et al. eds., Modernity: An Introduction to Modern Societies (Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1996) 185.Google Scholar Pearce, F. “Introduction” in The Radical Durkheim (Winchester, MA: Unwin Hymen, 1989) 1 Google Scholar; Purvis, T. and Hunt, A., “Discourse, Ideology, discourse, ideology” (1993) 44:3 Brit. J. Soc. 473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

27 Carter, supra note 1 at 76.

28 Ibid. at 157.

29 Ibid., at 78.

30 Ibid. at 159.

31 Ibid. at 165.

32 Ibid. at 191.

33 For more on theory and theorising in criminal justice studies see J. Frauley, “Practising Theory: Representing Theory and Theorising in the Sociology of Criminal Justice” [forthcoming].

34 Neugebauer, supra note 1 at xiv.

35 Ibid.

36 Hinch, R., “Teaching Introductory Sociology: Alternatives to the Encyclopedic Text” (1988) 12:1 Society 2 Google Scholar. See also Frauley, supra note 33.

37 Neugebauer, supra note 1 at xiii.

38 Ibid. at 87.

39 Ibid. at 66.

40 Chan and Mirchandani, supra note 1 at 11.

41 Ibid. at 7.

42 Ibid. at 9–10, 11.

43 Ibid. at 9–10.

44 Carter, supra note 1 at 88–91.

45 Ibid. at 89.

46 Ibid. at 88.

47 Ibid. at 89.

48 Ibid. at 90.

49 Hunt, A., Explorations in Law and Society: Toward a Constitutive Theory of Law (New York: Routledge, 1993) at 60 Google Scholar; Frauley, supra note 33.

50 Lopez and Potter, supra note 2 at 9; and see next section.

51 Corsianos, M., “Freedom versus Equality: Where Does Justice Lie?” in Corsianos, M. and Train, K., eds., Interrogating Social Justice: Politics, Culture and Identity (Toronto: Canadian Scholar's Press, 1999) 1 Google Scholar; Currie, supra note 22; O'Reilly-Fleming, T., “Left Realism as Theoretical Retreatism or Paradigm Shift: Toward Post-Critical Criminology” in O'Reilly-Fleming, T., ed., Post-critical Criminology (Toronto: Prentice-Hall, 1996) 1.Google Scholar

52 See for example Cassels, J. and Maloney, M., “Critical Legal Education: Paralysis with a Purpose” (1989) 4 C.J.L.S. 99 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Conklin, W.E., “Teaching Critically within a Modern Legal Culture” (1993) 8 C.J.L.S. 33 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Duncanson, I., “Legal Education and the Possibility of Critique: An Australian Perspective” (1993) 8 C.J.L.S. 59 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hunt, A., “Jurisprudence, Philosophy and Legal Education – Against Foundationalism: A Response to Neil MacCormick” (1986) 6 L.S. 292 Google Scholar; Hunt, A., “The Role and Place of Theory in Legal Education: Reflections on Foundationalism” (1989) 9 L.S. 146 Google Scholar; Sargent, N., “The Possibilities and Perils of Legal Studies” (1991) 6 C.J.L.S. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

53 See Curtis, B. and Weir, L., “The Succession Question in English Canadian Sociology” (2002) 26:3 Society 3 Google Scholar; DeFlem, M., “Teaching Criminal Justice in Liberal Arts Education: A Sociologist's Confessions” (2002) XXII(2) ACJS Today Google Scholar; Farrell, B. and Koch, L., “Criminal Justice, Sociology, and Academia” (1995) 26 Am. Sociologist. 52 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Halsted, J.B., “Criminal Justice Education and the Humanities: A New Era?” (1985) 5 Educ. & Psych. Res. 149 Google Scholar; Hinch, R., “Teaching Marxian Perspectives on Law and Crime” (1988) 15 Social Just. 204 Google Scholar; Hinch, R.; “Teaching Critical Criminology and Critical Justice Studies in Canada” (1989) 1 J. Hum. Just 63 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; McMullan, J. and Ratner, R.S., “Radical versus Technocratic Analyses in the Study of Crime: Critique of Criminal Justice in Canada ” (1982) 24 Can. J. Crim. 483 Google Scholar; Taylor, I., Walton, P., and Young, J., The New Criminology: for a Social Theory of Deviance (Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

54 Benton, supra note 8 at 5.

55 Bottomore, T., Sociology: a Guide to Problems and Literature (Boston: Allen & Unwin, 1972) at 79.Google Scholar

56 Benton, supra note 8 at 4.

57 Bourdieu, P., “The Practice of Reflexive Sociology” in An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992) 218 at 225.Google Scholar

58 Ibid. and see Benton, supra note 8.

59 Bourdieu, ibid. at 236–37.

60 Gramsci, A., “The Study of Philosophy and of Historical Materialism” in The Modern Prince and Other Writings (New York: International Publishers, 1957) 58 at 38–39.Google Scholar

61 Supra note 49 at 216.

62 Ibid. at 165.

63 Collier, supra note 2 at 16.

64 Benton, supra note 8 at 2–3.

65 Frauley, supra note 33.

66 Hunt, supra note 49 at 165.

67 Sayer, supra note 9.