No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Triage: Going full circle? Hopefully
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 May 2015
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS1481803500011015/resource/name/firstPage-S1481803500011015a.jpg)
- Type
- Radical Departure • Virage radical
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2009
References
1.Fosnocht, DE, Chapman, CR, Swanson, ER, et al.Correlation of change in visual analog scale with pain relief in the ED. Am J Emerg Med 2005;23:55–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.DeLoach, LJ, Higgins, MS, Caplan, AB, et al.The visual analog scale in the immediate postoperative period: intrasubject variability and correlation with a numeric scale. Anesth Analg 1998;86:102–6.Google ScholarPubMed
5.Murray, M, Bullard, M, Grafstein, E.Revisions to the canadian emergency department triage and acuity scale implementation guidelines Can. J Emerg Med 2004;6:421–7.Google Scholar
6.CBS News. Canadian health care in crisis. Toronto (ON): CBS Corporation; 2005. Available:http://www.cbsnews.com/stories /2005/03/20/health/main681801.shtml?cmp=EM8705(accessed 2008 Nov 18).Google Scholar
7.Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, Inc. News of the day … in perspective. Tuscon (AZ): The Association; 2006. Available:http://www.aapsonline.org/nod/newsofday360.php (accessed 2008 Nov 18).Google Scholar
8.Subbe, CP, Slater, A, Menon, D, et al.Validation of physiological scoring systems in the accident and emergency department. Emerg Med J 2006;23:841–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed