Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T23:46:08.183Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A survey of one CCFP-EM program’s graduates: their background, intended type of practice and actual practice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2015

Lisa G. Shepherd  and
Julia K. Burden
Lisa G. Shepherd*
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, St. Thomas–Elgin General Hospital, St. Thomas, Ont.
Julia K. Burden
Affiliation:
University of Western Ontario, London, Ont.
*
Department of Emergency Medicine, St. Thomas–Elgin General Hospital, 189 Elm St., St. Thomas ON N5R 5C4

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objectives:

Our primary objective was to survey the graduates of one residency program with respect to anticipated versus actual medical practice.

Methods:

Using a modified Dillman technique, we surveyed all 83 physicians who had completed one year of residency training that led to certification of special competency in Emergency Medicine (CCFP-EM) at the University of Western Ontario (UWO) from 1982–2004. Respondents were asked what type of medicine they had thought they would practise before beginning their emergency medicine training. They were then asked to describe their employment from graduation to present time. Additional demographic information was collected. Correlation between demographic factors and other selected factors of influence upon career decisions was analyzed.

Results:

Our response rate was 87% (72/83), with 71% (51/72) respondents being male. At the start of their CCFP-EM residency training, 50% of respondents intended to practise emergency medicine exclusively and 47% intended to blend family and emergency medicine. For each of the respondents' first 4 positions of employment, the greatest percentage were practising emergency medicine only (ranging from 72% in position 1 to 53% in position 4), while the number engaging in a blended family/emergency medicine practice never exceeded 20%. No demographic factors surveyed had significant correlation with intended or actual practice. In all positions of employment, “type of practice” was ranked as the most influential factor in choosing that position.

Conclusion:

Most graduates of the UWO CCFP-EM program practise in emergency medicine only positions. Less than 20% are engaged in a blended family/emergency medicine practice. At training onset, one-half of the residents intended to practise emergency medicine exclusively. None of the demographic factors surveyed significantly correlated with intended or actual practice. Further examination of the practice patterns of all emergency medicine residency program graduates is an essential part of future planning for the specialty of Emergency Medicine in Canada.

Keywords

medical educationsurveyemergency medicine
Type
Original Research • Recherche originale
Information
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine , Volume 7 , Issue 5 , September 2005 , pp. 315 - 320
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2005

References

1.College of Family Physicians of Canada. Standards for accreditation of residency training programs. Toronto: The College; 2003. Available: http://www.cfpc.ca/education/education.asp (accessed 2005 July 26).Google Scholar
2.Chan, BTB. Do family physicians with emergency medicine certification actually practice family medicine? CMAJ 2002;167:869–70.Google Scholar
3.Dillman, DA. Mail and telephone surveys: the total design method. Washington: John Wiley and Sons Inc; 1978.Google Scholar
4.Ducharme, J. Preparing emergency physicians for the future. CMAJ 2003;168:1548–9.Google Scholar
5.Steiner, IP. Emergency medicine practice and training in Canada. CMAJ 2003;168:1549–50.Google ScholarPubMed
6.Godwin, M, Hodgetts, G, Seguin, R, MacDonald, S. The Ontario Family Medicine Residents Cohort Study: factors affecting residents’ decisions to practise obstetrics. CMAJ 2002;166:179–84.Google ScholarPubMed
7.Burton, KR, Wong, IK. A force to contend with: the gender gap closes in Canadian medical schools. CMAJ 2004;170:1385–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Woloschuk, W, Tarrant, M. Do students from rural backgrounds engage in rural family practice more than their urban-raised peers? Med Educ 2004;38:259–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Szafran, O, Crutcher, RA, Chaytors, RG. Location of family medicine graduates’ practices. What factors influence Albertans’ choices? Can Fam Physician 2001;47:2279–85.Google ScholarPubMed