Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-28T18:27:11.705Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The safety of ethanol infusions for the treatment of methanol or ethylene glycol intoxication: an observational study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2015

Mary Kate Wedge
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmacy, Saint John Regional Hospital, Saint John, NB
Sabrina Natarajan*
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmacy, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON
Christel Johanson
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmacy, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON
Rakesh Patel
Affiliation:
Department of Critical Care Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON Division of General Internal Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON
Salmaan Kanji
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmacy, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON Division of General Internal Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON The Ottawa Health Research Institute, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON
*
Department of Pharmacy, The Ottawa Hospital, General Campus, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6; snatarajan@ottawahospital.on.ca.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Background:

Methanol or ethylene glycol ingestion may result in significant morbidity or death without prompt treatment. Despite traditional and widespread use of intravenous ethanol as an antidote, its safety is not well described. An evaluation of the safety and ease of titrating ethanol infusions is necessary given the availability of an alternative antidote.

Objective:

To evaluate the safety and ease of titrating ethanol infusions for the treatment of methanol or ethylene glycol ingestion.

Methods:

We reviewed the hospital records of adults treated with ethanol at The Ottawa Hospital for methanol or ethylene glycol ingestion over a 9-year period. Using a standardized case report form, a single reviewer identified prespecified adverse events that developed after the start of ethanol therapy and classified dose adjustments during ethanol therapy as appropriate or inappropriate based on a priori criteria.

Results:

Forty-nine cases of methanol or ethylene glycol ingestion treated with ethanol were included in the analysis, of which 45 underwent hemodialysis, 38 were admitted to the intensive care unit, and 4 died. At least one adverse event was identified in 45 (92%) cases, including 35 (71%) with agitation requiring chemical or physical restraints and 10 (20%) with a depressed level of consciousness treated with intubation. The median number of ethanol concentration measurements per treatment course was 6 (range 0–24), of which only 27% were within the target range of 22 to 30 mmol/L and 47% were below. When measured concentrations were outside the target, the adjustment in ethanol dosing (or lack thereof) was deemed inappropriate 59% of the time, including 69% of the time during hemodialysis.

Conclusion:

Based on actual practice in a large academic centre, adverse events occur frequently with intravenous ethanol infusions, and ethanol titration is inefficient. The safety profile and therapeutic drug monitoring considerations for ethanol should be considered when choosing an antidote for methanol or ethylene glycol ingestion.

Type
Original Research • Recherche originale
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2012

References

REFERENCES

1.Lister, D, Tierney, M, Dickinson, G. Effectiveness of IV ethanol therapy combined with hemodialysis in the treatment of methanol and ethylene glycol poisoning. Can J Hosp Pharm 2005;58:42–7.Google Scholar
2.Brent, J, McMartin, K, Phillips, S, et al. Fomepizole for the treatment of ethylene glycol poisoning. N Engl J Med 1999;340:832–8, doi:10.1056/NEJM199903183401102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Brent, J, McMartin, K, Phillips, S, et al. Fomepizole for the treatment of methanol poisoning. N Engl J Med 2001;344:424–9, doi:10.1056/NEJM200102083440605.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Morris, M, Bedard, M, Massicotte, A, et al. The Ottawa Hospital: parenteral drug therapy manual. Ottawa: Ottawa Hospital: 2008.Google Scholar
5.Brent, J. Antidotes and alcohols: has fomepizole made ethanol an obsolete therapy? Int J Med Toxicol. 1998. Available at: http://www.ijmt.net/ijmt/1_1/1_1_2.html (accessed July 23, 2010).Google Scholar
6.Lepik, K, Levy, A, Sobolev, B, et al. Adverse drug events associated with the antidotes for methanol and ethylene glycol poisoning: a comparison of ethanol and fomepizole. Ann Emerg Med 2009;53:439–50, doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.05.008.Google Scholar
7.Jazz Pharmaceuticals. Antizol (fomepizole) injection product monograph. Available at: http://antizol.info/monograph.htm (accessed July 23, 2010).Google Scholar
8.Green, R. The management of severe toxic alcohol ingestions at a tertiary care center after the introduction of fomepizole. Am J Emerg Med 2007;25:799803, doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2007.01.017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Barceloux, DG, Krenzelok, EP, Olsen, K, et al. American Academy of Clinical Toxicology practice guidelines on the treatment of ethylene glycol poisoning. Clin Toxicol 1999;37:537–60, doi:10.1081/CLT-100102445.Google Scholar
10.Barceloux, DG, Bond, GR, Krenzelok, EP, et al. American Academy of Clinical Toxicology practice guidelines on the treatment of methanol poisoning. Clin Toxicol 2002;40:415–46, doi:10.1081/CLT-120006745.Google Scholar
11.Persson, H, Sjoberg, K, Haines, J, et al. Poisoning severity score—grading of acute poisoning. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1998;36:205–13, doi:10.3109/15563659809028940.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Sweetman, S, editor. Martindale: the complete drug reference. 36th ed. London: Pharmaceutical Press; 2009.Google Scholar
13.Brent, J. Fomepizole for ethylene glycol and methanol poisoning. N Engl J Med 2009;360:2216–23, doi:10.1056/NEJMct0806112.Google Scholar