Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Revisions to the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) adult guidelines

  • Michael J. Bullard (a1), Bernard Unger (a2), Julie Spence (a3), Eric Grafstein (a4) and the CTAS National Working Group (a5)...
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Revisions to the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) adult guidelines
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Revisions to the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) adult guidelines
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Revisions to the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) adult guidelines
      Available formats
      ×

Abstract

  • An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided below. To view the full text please use the links above to select your preferred format.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Emergency Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Alberta, Rm. 1G1.58, W.C. Mackenzie Centre, 8440–112 St., Edmonton AB T6G 2B7; michael.bullard@ualberta.ca

References

Hide All
1.Beveridge, R, Clark, B, Janes, L, et al. Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale: implementation guidelines. CJEM 1999;1(suppl):S2–28.
2.Warren, D. Jarvis, A, Leblanc, L; the National Triage Task Force members. Canadian Paediatric Triage and Acuity Scale: implementation guidelines for emergency departments. CJEM 2001;3(suppl):S1–27.
3.Grafstein, E, Unger, B, Bullard, M, et al. Canadian Emergency Department Information System (CEDIS) Presenting Complaint List (Version 1.0). CJEM 2003;5:2734.
4.Murray, M, Bullard, M, Grafstein, E. Revisions to the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale implementation guidelines. CJEM 2004;6:421–7.
5.Dong, SL, Bullard, MJ, Meurer, DP, et al. Reliability of computerized emergency triage. Acad Emerg Med 2006;13:269–75.
6.Grafstein, E, Innes, G, Westman, J, et al. Inter-rater reliability of a computerized presenting-complaint-linked triage system in an urban emergency department. CJEM 2003;5:323–9.
7.Dong, SL, Bullard, MJ, Meurer, DP, et al. Predictive validity of a computerized emergency triage tool. Acad Emerg Med 2007; 14:1621.
8.Jimenez, JG, Murray, MJ, Beveridge, R, et al. Implementation of the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) in the Principality of Andorra: Can triage parameters serve as emergency department quality indicators? CJEM 2003;5:315–22.
9.Innes, GD, Stenstrom, R, Grafstein, E, et al. Prospective time study derivation of emergency physician workload predictors. CJEM 2005;7:299308.
10.Dreyer, JF, Zaric, GS, McLeod, SL, et al. Triage as a predictor of emergency physician workload. CJEM 2006;8:202.
11.Stobbe, K, Dewar, D, Thornton, C, et al. Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS): rural implementation statement. CJEM 2003;5:104–7.
12.Grafstein, E. Bullard, MJ, Warren, D, et al. Revision of the Canadian Emergency Department Information System (CEDIS) Presenting Complaint List Version 1.1. CJEM 2008;10:151–60.
13.Dellinger, RP, Carlet, JM, Masur, H, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines for Management of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock. Crit Care Med 2004;32:858–73.
14.Rivers, E, Nguyen, B, Havstad, S, et al. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med 2001;345:1368–77.
15.Nystrom, PO. The systemic inflammatory response syndrome: definitions and aetiology. J Antimicrob Chemother 1998;41 (Suppl A):17.
16.Rodriguez-Merchan, EC. Management of musculoskeletal complications of hemophilia. Semin Thromb Hemost 2003;29:8796.
17.Hay, CR, Brown, S, Collins, PW, et al. The diagnosis and management of factor VIII and IX inhibitors: a guideline from the United Kingdom Haemophilia Centre Doctors Organisation. Br J Haematol 2006;133:591605.
18.Hemophilia and von Willebrand’s disease: 2. Management. Association of Hemophilia Clinic Directors of Canada. CMAJ 1995;153:147–57.
19.Leissinger, CA, Blatt, PM, Hoots, WK, et al. Role of prothrombin complex concentrates in reversing warfarin anticoagulation: a review of the literature. Am J Hematol 2008;83:137–43.
20.Veshchev, I, Elran, H, Salame, K. Recombinant coagulation factor Vila for rapid preoperative correction of warfarin-related coagulopathy in patients with acute subdural hematoma. Med Sci Monit 2002;8:CS98–100.
21.Practice guideline for the assessment and treatment of patients with suicidal behaviors. Am J Psychiatry 2003;160(Suppl):160.
22.Mackay, IPB, Cassels, C. Constant or special observations of in-patients presenting a risk of aggression or violence: nurse’ perceptions of the rules of engagement. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2005;12:464–71.
23.Victorian Emergency Department Mental Health Triage Project training manual. 2006. Available: www.health.vic.gov.au/emergency/mhtrainingmanual (accessed 2007 Sept 19).
24.Riker, RR, Picard, JT, Fraser, GL. Prospective evaluation of the Sedation-Agitation Scale for adult critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 1999;27:1325–9.
25.Campbell, RJ. Psychiatric dictionary. 7th ed. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 1996.
26.Stuart, GW, Laraia, MT, editors. Principles and practice of psychiatric nursing. 8th ed. St. Louis (MO): Elsevier Mosby; 2005.
27.Varcarolis, EM, Carson, VB, Shoemaker, NC, editors. Foundations of psychiatric mental health nursing: a clinical approach. 5th ed. St. Louis (MO): Elsevier; 2006.
28.Briscoe, M. Diagnoses or conditions. 2007. Available: www.rcpsych.ac.uk/mentalhealthinformation/definitions/diagnosesorconditions.aspx (accessed 2007 Sept 19).
29.Koocher, GP. Norcross, J, editors. Psychologists’ desk reference. 2nd ed. New York (NY):Oxford University Press; 2005.

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed