Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-684bc48f8b-g7stk Total loading time: 0.348 Render date: 2021-04-13T20:57:21.615Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }

Revisions to the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) adult guidelines

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2015

Michael J. Bullard
Affiliation:
University of Alberta Hospital, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.
Bernard Unger
Affiliation:
SMBD–Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montréal, Que.
Julie Spence
Affiliation:
St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.
Eric Grafstein
Affiliation:
St. Paul's Hospital and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
the CTAS National Working Group
Affiliation:
includes representatives from the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP), the National Emergency Nurses Affiliation (NENA), l'Association des médecins d'urgence du Québec (AMUQ), the Canadian Paediatric Society (CPS) and the Society of Rural Physicians of Canada (SRPC)
Corresponding

Abstract

Image of the first page of this article. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.
Type
CAEP Update • Mise à jour de l’ACMU
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2008

References

1.Beveridge, R, Clark, B, Janes, L, et al. Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale: implementation guidelines. CJEM 1999;1(suppl):S2–28.Google Scholar
2.Warren, D. Jarvis, A, Leblanc, L; the National Triage Task Force members. Canadian Paediatric Triage and Acuity Scale: implementation guidelines for emergency departments. CJEM 2001;3(suppl):S1–27.Google Scholar
3.Grafstein, E, Unger, B, Bullard, M, et al. Canadian Emergency Department Information System (CEDIS) Presenting Complaint List (Version 1.0). CJEM 2003;5:2734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Murray, M, Bullard, M, Grafstein, E. Revisions to the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale implementation guidelines. CJEM 2004;6:421–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Dong, SL, Bullard, MJ, Meurer, DP, et al. Reliability of computerized emergency triage. Acad Emerg Med 2006;13:269–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Grafstein, E, Innes, G, Westman, J, et al. Inter-rater reliability of a computerized presenting-complaint-linked triage system in an urban emergency department. CJEM 2003;5:323–9.Google Scholar
7.Dong, SL, Bullard, MJ, Meurer, DP, et al. Predictive validity of a computerized emergency triage tool. Acad Emerg Med 2007; 14:1621.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Jimenez, JG, Murray, MJ, Beveridge, R, et al. Implementation of the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) in the Principality of Andorra: Can triage parameters serve as emergency department quality indicators? CJEM 2003;5:315–22.Google ScholarPubMed
9.Innes, GD, Stenstrom, R, Grafstein, E, et al. Prospective time study derivation of emergency physician workload predictors. CJEM 2005;7:299308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Dreyer, JF, Zaric, GS, McLeod, SL, et al. Triage as a predictor of emergency physician workload. CJEM 2006;8:202.Google Scholar
11.Stobbe, K, Dewar, D, Thornton, C, et al. Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS): rural implementation statement. CJEM 2003;5:104–7.Google ScholarPubMed
12.Grafstein, E. Bullard, MJ, Warren, D, et al. Revision of the Canadian Emergency Department Information System (CEDIS) Presenting Complaint List Version 1.1. CJEM 2008;10:151–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Dellinger, RP, Carlet, JM, Masur, H, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines for Management of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock. Crit Care Med 2004;32:858–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Rivers, E, Nguyen, B, Havstad, S, et al. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med 2001;345:1368–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Nystrom, PO. The systemic inflammatory response syndrome: definitions and aetiology. J Antimicrob Chemother 1998;41 (Suppl A):17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Rodriguez-Merchan, EC. Management of musculoskeletal complications of hemophilia. Semin Thromb Hemost 2003;29:8796.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Hay, CR, Brown, S, Collins, PW, et al. The diagnosis and management of factor VIII and IX inhibitors: a guideline from the United Kingdom Haemophilia Centre Doctors Organisation. Br J Haematol 2006;133:591605.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Hemophilia and von Willebrand’s disease: 2. Management. Association of Hemophilia Clinic Directors of Canada. CMAJ 1995;153:147–57.Google Scholar
19.Leissinger, CA, Blatt, PM, Hoots, WK, et al. Role of prothrombin complex concentrates in reversing warfarin anticoagulation: a review of the literature. Am J Hematol 2008;83:137–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.Veshchev, I, Elran, H, Salame, K. Recombinant coagulation factor Vila for rapid preoperative correction of warfarin-related coagulopathy in patients with acute subdural hematoma. Med Sci Monit 2002;8:CS98–100.Google Scholar
21.Practice guideline for the assessment and treatment of patients with suicidal behaviors. Am J Psychiatry 2003;160(Suppl):160.Google Scholar
22.Mackay, IPB, Cassels, C. Constant or special observations of in-patients presenting a risk of aggression or violence: nurse’ perceptions of the rules of engagement. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2005;12:464–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23.Victorian Emergency Department Mental Health Triage Project training manual. 2006. Available: www.health.vic.gov.au/emergency/mhtrainingmanual (accessed 2007 Sept 19).Google Scholar
24.Riker, RR, Picard, JT, Fraser, GL. Prospective evaluation of the Sedation-Agitation Scale for adult critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 1999;27:1325–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25.Campbell, RJ. Psychiatric dictionary. 7th ed. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 1996.Google Scholar
26.Stuart, GW, Laraia, MT, editors. Principles and practice of psychiatric nursing. 8th ed. St. Louis (MO): Elsevier Mosby; 2005.Google Scholar
27.Varcarolis, EM, Carson, VB, Shoemaker, NC, editors. Foundations of psychiatric mental health nursing: a clinical approach. 5th ed. St. Louis (MO): Elsevier; 2006.Google Scholar
28.Briscoe, M. Diagnoses or conditions. 2007. Available: www.rcpsych.ac.uk/mentalhealthinformation/definitions/diagnosesorconditions.aspx (accessed 2007 Sept 19).Google ScholarPubMed
29.Koocher, GP. Norcross, J, editors. Psychologists’ desk reference. 2nd ed. New York (NY):Oxford University Press; 2005.Google Scholar

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 1904 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 13th April 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Access Access

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Revisions to the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) adult guidelines
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Revisions to the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) adult guidelines
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Revisions to the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) adult guidelines
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *