Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-dwq4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T23:16:03.435Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A prospective study of students’ and instructors’ opinions on Advanced Cardiac Life Support course teaching methods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2015

James Stempien  and
Martin Betz
James Stempien
Affiliation:
Emergency Medicine, Saskatoon Health Region, Saskatoon, Sask.
Martin Betz*
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Sheikh Khalifa Medical City, Abu Dhabi, UAE
*
Department of Emergency Medicine, Sheikh Khalifa Medical City, PO Box 51900, Abu Dhabi UAE; mgbetz@hotmail.com

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction:

The American Heart Association (AHA) revises the Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) course approximately every 5 years, citing the scientific literature for any changes to content and management recommendations. With ACLS 2005, the AHA also revised the methods used to teach course content. The AHA cited no evidence in making these changes. The ACLS 2005 course, distributed in early 2007, makes greater use of videos to teach students. This prospective study surveyed opinions of both students and instructors in an effort to determine the level of satisfaction with this method of teaching.

Methods:

During 16 consecutive ACLS courses, all students and instructors were asked to complete a questionnaire. The students provided demographic information, but completed the survey anonymously. Four questions probed the participants' opinions about the effectiveness of videos in learning ACLS skills. Experienced participants were asked to compare the new teaching methods with previous courses. Opinions were compared among several subgroups based on sex, occupation and previous experience.

Results:

Of the 180 students who participated, 71% felt the videos were unequivocally useful for teaching ACLS skills. Fewer first-time students were unequivocally positive (59%) compared with those who had taken 2 or more previous courses (84%). A small proportion of students (13%) desired more hands-on practice time. Of the 16 instructors who participated, 31% felt that the videos were useful for teaching ACLS skills. No differences were found between doctors and nurses, or between men and women.

Conclusion:

The use of standardized videos in ACLS courses was felt by the majority of students and a minority of instructors to be unequivocally useful. First-time students had more doubts about the effectiveness of videos.

Keywords

Advanced Cardiac Life Support coursecourse assessmentteaching
Type
Education • Enseignment
Information
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , January 2009 , pp. 57 - 63
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2009

References

1.Hazinski, MF, Nadkarni, VM, Hickey, RW, et al.Major changes in the 2005 AHA Guidelines for CPR and ECC: reaching the tipping point for change. Circulation 2005;112(Suppl 24):IV206–11.Google Scholar
2.American Heart Association. ACLS Instructor Manual (2006). Dallas (TX): The Association; 2006. p. 2–5.Google Scholar
3.Wayne, DB, Didwania, A, Feinglass, J, et al.Simulation-based education quality of care during cardiac arrest team responses at an academic teaching hospital: a case-control study. Chest Epub 2007 June 15 ahead of print.Google Scholar
4.Issenberg, SB, Mcgaghie, WC, Petrusa, ER, et al.Features and uses of high-fidelitymedical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review. Med Teach 2005;27:10–28.Google Scholar
5.Schwid, HA, Rooke, GA, Ross, BK, et al.Use of a computerized advanced cardiac lifesupport simulator improves retention of advanced cardiac life support guidelines better than a textbook review. Crit Care Med 1999;27:821–4.Google Scholar
6.American Heart Association. ECC Course Matrix 2006. BLS for Healthcare Provider Course. Dallas (TX): The Association; 2006. Available: www.americanheart.org/downloadable/heart/116785 6286911ECC%20Course%20Matrix%202006%20Final.pdf (accessed 2008 Nov 27).Google Scholar
7.Laurillard, D.Rethinking university teaching. London (UK): Routledge; 1993. p. 284.Google Scholar
8.Smith, D, Mate, N.Personalizing the abstract with online video. Toronto (ON): Education Canada; 2006. p. 50–2.Google Scholar
9.Chambers, B, Cheung, A, Madden, N, et al.Achievement effects of embedded multimedia in a Success for All Reading Program. J Educ Psychol 2006;98:232–7.Google Scholar
10.Muller, DA, Sharma, MD, Reimann , P.Raising cognitive load with linear multimedia to promote conceptual change. Sci Educ 2008;92:278–96.Google Scholar
11.Abu-Laban, RB.Reflections on ACLS. CJEM 2005;7:415–6.Google Scholar
12.Sanna, T, La Torre, G, de Waure, C, et al.Cardiopulmonary resuscitation alone vs. cardiopulmonary resuscitation plus automated external defibrillator use by non-healthcare professionals: A meta-analysis on 1583 cases of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation Epub 2007 Sept 15 ahead of print.Google Scholar