Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T08:32:29.883Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

P055: An international, interprofessional investigation of the podcast listening habits of emergency clinicians: a METRIQ Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2018

S.M. Goerzen*
Affiliation:
University of Saskatchewan, Regina, SK
B. Thoma
Affiliation:
University of Saskatchewan, Regina, SK
T. Horeczko
Affiliation:
University of Saskatchewan, Regina, SK
J. Riddell
Affiliation:
University of Saskatchewan, Regina, SK
T.M. Chan
Affiliation:
University of Saskatchewan, Regina, SK
A. Tagg
Affiliation:
University of Saskatchewan, Regina, SK
D. Roland
Affiliation:
University of Saskatchewan, Regina, SK
A. Alenyo
Affiliation:
University of Saskatchewan, Regina, SK
K. Knight
Affiliation:
University of Saskatchewan, Regina, SK
S. Bruijns
Affiliation:
University of Saskatchewan, Regina, SK
*
*Corresponding author

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Introduction: Emergency medicine clinicians (physicians, nurses, paramedics, physician assistants) utilize podcasts for learning. However, their versatility produces variability in the ways they are used (e.g. their speed can be increased or decreased, unrelated activities can be performed simultaneously, or they can be accompanied by active learning methods). This study investigated how and why podcasts are used by an international cohort of clinicians. Methods: An international sample of medical students, residents, physicians, nurses, physician assistants, and paramedics was recruited to complete a survey hosted on FluidSurveys software using social media (Twitter and Facebook), direct contact from our international authorship group, infographics, and a study website (https://METRIQstudy.org/). Participants who indicated interest in the study were sent an email containing the study survey. Reminder emails were sent every 5-10 days a maximum of three times. Results: 462 clinicians expressed interest and 397 completed the survey (86.0% completion rate). Participants hailed from 34 countries (38.8% Canada, 30% United States, 31.2% outside of North America) and a majority (61.9%) were physicians. Approximately half (45.8%) of the participants listened to podcasts weekly. Podcasts were used to learn core material (75.1%), refresh memory (72.3%), or review new literature (75.8%). Most listened on iPhones (61%) and the native Apple App (66.1%). The preferred Android apps were Pocket Casts (22.8%) and Google Play (18.5%). Many listened to podcasts while driving (72.3%). Active learning techniques such as pausing, repeating segments, taking notes, or listening to a podcast more than once were rarely used (1/4 of the time or less) by the majority of participants. Conclusion: This study describes how and why medical education podcasts are used by emergency medicine clinicians and should inform both podcast producers and future research investigating the impact of various listening habits on retention. Further analysis of the data will elucidate differences in listening habits

Type
Poster Presentations
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2018