Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-10T14:07:26.300Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

P011: Discerning perceived barriers and facilitators to goals of care discussion in the emergency department: A survey of emergency physicians and residents

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2017

N. Argintaru*
Affiliation:
University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
S. Vaillancourt
Affiliation:
University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
L.B. Chartier
Affiliation:
University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
J.S. Lee
Affiliation:
University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
E. O’Connor
Affiliation:
University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
P. Hannam
Affiliation:
University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
H.J. Ovens
Affiliation:
University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
M. McGowan
Affiliation:
University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
L. Steinberg
Affiliation:
University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
K. Quinn
Affiliation:
University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
*
*Corresponding authors

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Introduction: Patients presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) may require clarification of their goals of care (GOC) to ensure they receive treatments aligned with their values. However, these discussions can be difficult to conduct for multiple reasons, including lack of time in a busy ED, competing priorities and a limited relationship with the patient. Few studies have examined the perceived challenges faced by Emergency Physicians in conducting GOC discussions. This study sought to contextualize and discern the barriers and facilitators to having these conversations as reported by Emergency physicians. Methods: An interdisciplinary team of Emergency Medicine, Palliative Care and Internal Medicine providers developed an online survey comprised of multiple choice, Likert-scale and open-ended questions to explore four domains of GOC discussions: training; communication; environment; and personal beliefs. Invitations and scheduled reminders were sent to 275 ED physicians at six academic sites in a Canadian urban centre, including 49 EM residents. Results: 105 (46%) staff physicians and 23 (47%) residents responded with similar representation from all sites. Differences were reported in the frequency of GOC discussions: 59% of staff physicians conduct several per month whereas 65% of residents conduct less than one per month. Most agreed that GOC discussions are within their scope of practice (92%), they feel comfortable (96%), and are adequately trained (73%) to have them; however, 66% reported difficulty initiating GOC discussions. 73% believed that admitting services should conduct GOC discussions, yet acuity was noted in the comments as a major determinant with initiating GOC discussions by ED physicians. Main barriers identified were lack of time, chaotic environment, lack of advanced directives and the inability to reach substitute decision makers. 54% of respondents indicated that the availability of 24-hour Palliative Care consults would facilitate GOC discussions in the ED. Conclusion: Emergency physicians are prepared to conduct goals of care discussions, but often believe they should instead be conducted by the patient’s admitting service. Multiple perceived barriers to goals of care discussion in the ED were identified, and a majority of respondents felt that the availability of Palliative Care in the ED may facilitate these discussions.

Type
Poster Presentations
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2017