1.Beveridge, R, Clarke, B, Janes, L, et al. Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale: implementation guidelines. Can J Emerg Med. 1999;1(3 Supplement):S1–S24.
2.Beveridge, R. CAEP issues. The Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale: a new and critical element in health care reform. Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians. J Emerg Med 1998;16:507–11.
3.Murray, MJ, Bullard, MJ, Grafstein, E. Revisions to the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Ccale implementation guidelines. Can J Emerg Med. 2004;6:421–7.
4.Spence, JM, Beaton, DE, Murray, MJ, et al. Does the Canadian emergency department triage and acuity scale correlate with admission to the hospital from the emergency department? Can J Emerg Med. 2003;6:180.
5.Stenstrom, R, Grafstein, GE, Innes, G, et al. The predictive validity of the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS). Can J Emerg Med. 2003;5:184.
6.Murray, MJ, Levis, G. Does triage level (Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale) correlate with resource utilization for emergency department visits? Can J Emerg Med. 2003;6:180.
7.Jimenez, JG, Murray, MJ, Beveridge, R, et al. Implementation of the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale in the principality of Andorra: Can triage parameters serve as emergency department quality indicators? Can J Emerg Med. 2003;5:315–22.
8.Grafstein, E, Innes, G, Westman, J, et al. Inter-rater reliability of a computerized presenting-complaint-linked triage system in an urban emergency department. Can J EmergMed. 2003;5:323–9.
9.Dong, SL, Bullard, MJ, Meurer, DP, et al. Reliability of computerized emergency triage. Acad Emerg Med 2006;13:269–75.
10.Dong, SL, Bullard, MJ, Meurer, DP, et al. Emergency triage: comparing a novel computer triage program with standard triage. Acad Emerg Med 2005;12:502–7.
11.Handler, JA, Adams, JG, Feied, CF, et al. Emergency medicine information technology consensus conference: executive summary. Acad Emerg Med 2004;11:1112–3.
12.Grafstein, E, Bullard, MJ, Unger, B. The Canadian Emergency Department Information System (CEDrosoph Inf Serv) presenting complaint list version 1.0. Can J Emerg Med. 2003;5:27–34.
13.Bullard, MJ, Meurer, D, Pratt, S, et al. Evaluation of triage nurse satisfaction with training and use of an electronic triage tool. Can J Emerg Med. 2003;5:183–4.
14.Fleiss, JL, Levin, B, Paik, MC. Statistical methods for rates and proportions, 3rd Edition. New Jersey (NY): J. Wiley; 2003.
15.Goransson, K, Ehrenberg, A, Marklund, B, et al. Accuracy and concordance of nurses in emergency department triage. Scand J Caring Sci 2005;19:432–8.
16.Beveridge, R, Ducharme, J, Janes, L, et al. Reliability of the Canadian emergency department triage and acuity scale: interrater agreement. Ann Emerg Med 1999;34:155–9.
17.Manos, D, Petrie, DA, Beveridge, R,et al. Inter-observer agreement using the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale. Can J Emerg Med. 2002;4:16–22.
18.Worster, A, Gilboy, N, Fernandes, CM, et al. Assessment of interobserver reliability of two five-level triage and acuity scales: a randomized controlled trial. Can J EmergMed 2004;6:240–5.
19.Wuerz, RC, Milne, LW, Eitel, DR, et al. Reliability and validity of a new five-level triage instrument. Acad Emerg Med 2000;7:236–42.
20.Eitel, DR, Travers, DA, Rosenau, AM, et al. The Emergency Severity Index Triage Algorithm version 2 is reliable and valid. Acad Emerg Med 2003;10:1070–80.
21.Tanabe, P, Gimbel, R, Yarnold, PR, et al. Reliability and validity of scores on the Emergency Severity Index version 3. Acad Emerg Med 2004;11:59–65.
22.Kramer, MS, Feinstein, AR. Clinical biostatistics. LIV. The bio-statistics ofconcordance. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1981;29:111–23.
23.Warren, D, Jarvis, A, Leblanc, L. Canadian Pediatric Triage and Acuity Scale: implementation guidelines for emergency departments. Can J Emerg Med. 2001;3(4 Supplement):S1–S27.
24.Fernandes, CM, Wuerz, R, Clark, S, et al. How reliable is emergency department triage? Ann Emerg Med 1999;34:141–7.
25.Berman, DA, Coleridge, ST, McMurry, TA. Computerized algorithm-directed triage in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 1989;18:141–4.
26.Maningas, PA, Hime, DA, Parker, DE,et al. The Soterion Rapid Triage System: evaluation of inter-rater reliability and validity. J Emerg Med; 2006;30:461–9.
27.Australasian College for Emergency Medicine. National Triage Scale. Emerg Med 1994;6:145–6.
28.Mackway-Jones, K, Manchester Triage Group. Emergency triage. London (UK): BMJ; 1997.
29.Lapointe, L, Rivard, S. Getting physicians to accept new information technology: insights from case studies. CMAJ 2006;174:1573–8.
30.Rodger, MA, Maser, E, Stiell, I, et al. The interobserver reliability of pretest probability assessment in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Thromb Res 2005;116:101–7.
31.Stiell, IG, Wells, GA, Vandemheen, K, et al. The Canadian CT Head Rule for patients with minor head injury. Lancet 2001;357:1391–6.