Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T20:29:03.117Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Education scholarship in emergency medicine part 3: a “how-to” guide

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 March 2015

Farhan Bhanji ,
Adam Cheng ,
Jason R. Frank  and
Jonathan Sherbino
Farhan Bhanji
Affiliation:
Centre for Medical Education, McGill University, Montreal,, QC
Adam Cheng
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB
Jason R. Frank
Affiliation:
Centre for Medical Education, McGill University, Montreal,, QC
Jonathan Sherbino*
Affiliation:
Division of Emergency Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON
*
McMaster Clinic, Hamilton General Hospital, 237 Barton Street East, Hamilton, ON L8L 2X2; sherbino@mcmaster.ca

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Successful emergency medicine (EM) education scholarship requires a systematic approach that includes searching the (grey) literature, mobilizing resources, adopting frameworks to focus the innovation, integrating a component of program evaluation, and disseminating the innovation via traditional and emerging avenues. This paper provides direction for EM teachers and educators looking to transform their education innovation into scholarship. Recommendations on producing EM education scholarship from the 2013 consensus conference of the Academic Section of the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians are presented.

Keywords

education scholarshipemergency medicineresearch process
Type
Caep Academic Symposium Paper
Information
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine , Volume 16 , Issue S1 , May 2014 , pp. S13 - S18
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2014

References

REFERENCES

1.LaMantia, J, Deiorio, NM, Yarris, LM. Executive summary: education research in emergency medicine-opportunities, challenges, and strategies for success. Acad Emerg Med 2012;19:1319–22, doi:10.1111/acem.12027.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Frank, JR. Health profession education research. In: Harvey, BJ, Lang, ES, Frank, JF, editors. The research guide: a primer for residents, other health care trainees, and practitioners. Ottawa: The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada; 2011. p. 103–9.Google Scholar
3.Sherbino, J, van Melle, E, Bandiera, G, et al. Education scholarship in emergency medicine part 1: innovating and improving teaching and learning. CJEM 2014;16:00–00.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Bandiera, G, LeBlanc, C, Regehr, G, et al. Education scholarship in emergency medicine part 2: supporting and developing scholars. CJEM 2014;16:00–00.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Boyer, E. Scholarship reconsidered: priorities of the professoriate. Princeton (NJ): The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching; 1990.Google Scholar
6.Fincher, RM, Work, JA. Perspectives on the scholarship of teaching. Med Educ 2006;40:293–5, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02404.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Lamantia, J, Kuhn, GJ, Searle, NS. The CORD Academy for scholarship in education in emergency medicine. Acad Emerg Med 2010;17 Suppl 2:S13–5, doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00895.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Sherbino, J, Snell, L, Dath, D, et al. A national clinicianeducator program: a model of an effective community of practice. Med Educ Online 2010;15, doi:10.3402/meo.v15i0.5356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Tekian, A, Roberts, T, Batty, HP, et al. Preparing leaders inhealth professions education. Med Teach 2014;36:269–71, doi:10.3109/0142159X.2013.849332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.van Melle, E, Curran, V, Goldszmidt, M, et al. Toward a common understanding: advancing education scholarship for clinical faculty in Canadian medical schools. A position paper. Ottawa: Canadian Association for Medical Education; 2012.Google Scholar
11.Kern, DE, Thomas, PA, Howard, DM, et al. Curriculum development for medical education: a six-step approach. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press; 2009.Google Scholar
12.Sherbino, J, Frank, JR, editors. Educational design: a CanMEDS guide for the health professions. Ottawa: The Royal College of Physicians & Surgeons; 2011.Google Scholar
13.Cook, DA. Twelve tips for evaluating educational programs. Med Teach 2010;32:296–301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Kirkpatrick, DL. Evaluating training programs: the four levels. San Francisco (CA): Berrett-Koehler; 1994.Google Scholar
15.Frye, AW, Hemmer, PA. Program evaluation models and related theories: AMEE guide no. 67. Med Teach 2012;34:e288–99, doi:10.3109/0142159X.2012.668637.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Haji, F, Morin, MP, Parker, K. Rethinking programme evaluation in health professions education: beyond ‘did it work?’ Med Educ 2013;47:342–51, doi:10.1111/medu.12091.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Cook, DA, West, CP. Perspective: reconsidering the focus on “outcomesresearch” inmedicaleducation:acautionarynote. Acad Med 2013;88:162–7, doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e31827c3d78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Sherbino, J. Brief educational reports: a new manuscript category. CJEM 2012;14:325.Google ScholarPubMed
19.Gordon, JA. Reflections on the consensus process: a leadership role for emergency medicine in educational scholarship and practice across health care. Acad Emerg Med 2012;19:1333–5, doi:10.1111/acem.12020.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed