Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-24T03:55:14.923Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Conservative management of laryngeal perforation in a rural setting: case report and review of the literature on penetrating neck injuries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2015

Michael R. Kolber*
Affiliation:
Department of Family Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB and private practice, Peace River, AB
Anne Aspler
Affiliation:
University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB
Richard Sequeira
Affiliation:
Diasnostic Imaging, Peace River Community Health Centre, Peace River, AB
*
Box 7590, Peace River, AB T6R 1L4; mkolber@ualberta.ca

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Penetrating neck injuries (PNIs) are infrequent but can result in significant morbidity and mortality. Although surgical management of unstable patients with penetrating neck trauma is the standard of care, management of stable patients remains controversial owing to the possibility of occult injuries. Recent studies suggest that physical examination and ancillary imaging may be sufficiently accurate to diagnose or rule out surgically significant injuries in PNI. We report a patient with a laryngeal perforation who was managed conservatively in a rural hospital without complications and review the literature pertinent to cases of this nature.

Type
Case Report • Rapport de cas
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2011

References

REFERENCES

1.Brywczynski, JJ, Barrett, TW, Lyon, JA, et al. Management of penetrating neck injury in the emergency department: a structured literature review. Emerg Med J 2008;25:711–5.Google Scholar
2.Bell, RB, Osborn, T, Dierks, EJ, et al. Management of penetrating neck injuries: a new paradigm for civilian trauma. J OralMaxillofac Surg 2007;65:691705.Google ScholarPubMed
3.Bagheri, SC, Khan, HA, Bell, RB. Penetrating neck injuries. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2008;20:393414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Kesser, BW, Chance, E, Kleiner, D, et al. Contemporary management of penetrating neck trauma. Am Surg 2009;75:110.Google Scholar
5.Nason, RW, Assuras, GN, Gray, PR, et al. Penetrating neck injuries: analysis of experience from a Canadian trauma centre. Can J Surg 2001;44:122–6.Google ScholarPubMed
6.Tisherman, SA, Bokhari, F, Collier, B, et al. Clinical practice guideline: penetrating zone II neck trauma. J Trauma 2008;64:1392–405.Google ScholarPubMed
7.Irish, JC, Hekkenberg, R, Gullane, PJ, et al. Penetrating and blunt neck trauma: 10-year review of a Canadian experience. Can J Surg 1997;40:33–8.Google Scholar
8.Fogelman, MJ, Stewart, RD. Penetrating wounds of the neck. Am J Surg 1956;91:581–93; discussion 593-6.Google Scholar
9.Insull, P, Adams, D, Segar, A, et al. Is exploration mandatory in penetrating zone II neck injuries? Aust N Z J Surg 2007;77:261–4.Google Scholar
10.Demetriades, D, Theodorou, D, Cornwell, E 3rd, et al. Penetrating injuries of the neck in patients in stable condition. Physical examination, angiography, or color flow Doppler imaging. Arch Surg 1995;130:971–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Azuaje, RE, Jacobson, LE, Glover, J, et al. Reliability of physical examination as a predictor of vascular injury after penetrating neck trauma. Am Surg 2003;69:804–7.Google Scholar
12.Mohammed, GS, Pillay, WR, Barker, P, et al. The role of clinical examination in excluding vascular injury in haemodynamically stable patients with gunshot wounds to the neck. A prospective study of 59 patients. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2004;28:425–30.Google Scholar
13.Gonzalez, RP, Falimirski, M, Holevar, MR, et al. Penetrating zone II neck injury: does dynamic computed tomographic scan contribute to the diagnostic sensitivity of physical examination for surgically significant injury? A prospective blinded study. J Trauma 2003;54:61–4; discussion 64-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Inaba, K, Munera, F, McKenney, M, et al. Prospective evaluation of screening multislice helical computed tomographic angiography in the initial evaluation of penetrating neck injuries. J Trauma 2006;61:144–9.Google Scholar
15.Munera, F, Soto, JA, Palacio, D, et al. Diagnosis of arterial injuries caused by penetrating trauma to the neck: comparison of helical CT angiography and conventional angiography. Radiology 2000;216:356–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Munera, F, Soto, JA, Nunez, D. Penetrating injuries of the neck and the increasing role of CTA. Emerg Radiol 2004;10:303–9.Google Scholar
17.Munera, F, Danton, G, Rivas, LA, et al. Multidetector row computed tomography in the management of penetrating neck injuries. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2009;30:195204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Mazolewski, PJ, Curry, JD, Browder, T, et al. Computed tomographic scan can be used for surgical decision making in zone II penetrating neck injuries. J Trauma 2001;51:315–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Osborn, TM, Bell, RB, Qaisi, W, et al. Computed tomographic angiography as an aid to clinical decision making in the selective management of penetrating injuries to the neck: a reduction in the need for operative exploration. J Trauma 2008;64:1466–71.Google Scholar
20.Demetriades, D, Theodorou, D, Cornwell, E, et al. Evaluation of penetrating injuries of the neck: prospective study of 223 patients. World J Surg 1997;21:41–7; discussion 47-8.Google Scholar
21.Montalvo, BM, LeBlang, SD, Nunez, DB Jr, et al. Color Doppler sonography in penetrating injuries of the neck. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1996;17:943–51.Google ScholarPubMed
22.Apffelstaedt, JP, Muller, R. Results of mandatory exploration for penetrating neck trauma. World J Surg 1994;18:917–9; discussion 920.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23.Golueke, PJ, Goldstein, AS, Sclafani, SJ, et al. Routine versus selective exploration of penetrating neck injuries: a randomized prospective study. J Trauma 1984;24:1010–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24.Sekharan, J, Dennis, JW, Veldenz, HC, et al. Continued experience with physical examination alone for evaluation and management of penetrating zone 2 neck injuries: results of 145 cases. J Vasc Surg 2000;32:483–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25.Thoma, M, Navsaria, PH, Edu, S, et al. Analysis of 203 patients with penetrating neck injuries. World J Surg 2008;32:2716–23.Google Scholar
26.Bell, RB, Verschueren, DS, Dierks, EJ. Management of laryngeal trauma. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2008;20:415–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed