Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Canadian C-Spine Rule study for alert and stable trauma patients: I. Background and rationale

Abstract

This paper is Part I of a 2-part series to describe the background and methodology for the Canadian C-Spine Rule study to develop a clinical decision rule for rational imaging in alert and stable trauma patients. Current use of radiography is inefficient and variable, in part because there has been a lack of evidence-based guidelines to assist emergency physicians. Clinical decision rules are research-based decision-making tools that incorporate 3 or more variables from the history, physical examination or simple tests. The Canadian CT Head and C-Spine (CCC) Study is a large collaborative effort to develop clinical decision rules for the use of CT head in minor head injury and for the use of cervical spine radiography in alert and stable trauma victims. Part I details the background and rationale for the development of the Canadian C-Spine Rule. Part II will describe in detail the objectives and methods of the Canadian C-Spine Rule study.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Canadian C-Spine Rule study for alert and stable trauma patients: I. Background and rationale
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Canadian C-Spine Rule study for alert and stable trauma patients: I. Background and rationale
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Canadian C-Spine Rule study for alert and stable trauma patients: I. Background and rationale
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

Corresponding author

Clinical Epidemiology Unit, F6, Ottawa Health Research Institute, 1053 Carling Ave., Ottawa ON K1Y 4E9; 613 798-5555 x18688, fax 613 761-5351, istiell@ohri.ca

References

Hide All
1.McCaig, LF.National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 1992 emergency department summary. Advance Data 1994;245:112.
2.National Center for Health Statistics. National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey 1992. Hyattsville: National Center for Health Statistics, 1994.
3.Reid, DC, Henderson, R, Saboe, L, Miller, JDR.Etiology and clinical course of missed spine fractures. J Trauma 1987;27:9806.
4.Diliberti, T, Lindsey, RW.Evaluation of the cervical spine in the emergency setting: Who does not need an x-ray? Orthopedics 1992;15:17983.
5.Bachulis, BL, Long, WB, Hynes, GD, Johnson, MC.Clinical indications for cervical spine radiographs in the traumatized patient. Am J Surg 1987;153:4737.
6.Stiell, IG, Wells, GA, Vandemheen, K, Laupacis, A, Brison, R, Eisenhauer, MA, et al. Variation in emergency department use of cervical spine radiography for alert, stable trauma patients. CMAJ 1997;156:153744.
7.McNamara, RM, Heine, E, Esposito, B.Cervical spine injury and radiography in alert, high-risk patients. J Emerg Med 1990; 8:17782.
8.McKee, TR, Tinkoff, G, Rhodes, M.Asymptomatic occult cervical spine fracture: case report and review of the literature. J Trauma 1990;30:6236.
9.Roberge, RJ, Wears, RC, Kelly, M, Evans, TC, Kenny, MA, Daffner, RD, et al. Selective application of cervical spine radiography in alert victims of blunt trauma: a prospective study. J Trauma 1988;28:7848.
10.Jacobs, LM, Schwartz, R.Prospective analysis of acute cervical spine injury: a methodology to predict injury. Ann Emerg Med 1986;15:449.
11.Mirvis, SE, Diaconis, JN, Chirico, PA, Reiner, BI, Joslyn, JN, Militello, P.Protocol-driven radiologic evaluation of suspected cervical spine injury: efficacy study. Radiology 1989;170:8314.
12.Fischer, RP.Cervical radiographic evaluation of alert patients following blunt trauma. Ann Emerg Med 1984;13:9057.
13.Gbaanador, GBM, Fruin, AH, Taylon, C.Role of routine emergency cervical radiography in head trauma. Am J Surg 1986; 52:6438.
14.Bayless, P, Ray, VG.Incidence of cervical spine injuries in association with blunt head trauma. Am J Emerg Med 1989;7:13942.
15.Neifeld, GL, Keene, JG, Hevesy, G, Leikin, J, Proust, A, Thisted, RA.Cervical injury in head trauma. J Emerg Med 1988;6:2037.
16.Cadoux, CG, White, JD, Hedberg, MC.High-yield roentgenographic criteria for cervical spine injuries. Ann Emerg Med 1987;16:73842.
17.McNamara, RM, O’Brien, MC, Davidheiser, S.Post-traumatic neck pain: a prospective and follow-up study. Ann Emerg Med 1988;17:90611.
18.Kreipke, DL, Gillespie, KR, McCarthy, MC, Mail, JT, Lappas, JC, Broadie, TA.Reliability of indications for cervical spine films in trauma patients. J Trauma 1989;29:14389.
19.Hoffman, JR, Schriger, DL, Mower, W, Luo, JS, Zucker, M.Lowrisk criteria for cervical-spine radiography in blunt trauma: a prospective study. Ann Emerg Med 1992;21:145460.
20.Lindsey, RW, Diliberti, TC, Doherty, BJ, Watson, AB.Efficacy of radiographic evaluation of the cervical spine in emergency situations. South Med J 1993;86:12535.
21.Davis, JW, Phreaner, DL, Hoyt, DB, Mackersie, RC.The etiology of missed cervical spine injuries. J Trauma 1993;34:3426.
22.Hills, MW, Deane, SA.Head injury and facial injury: Is there an increased risk of cervical spine injury? J Trauma 1993;34:54954.
23.Vandemark, RM.Radiology of the cervical spine in trauma patients: practice pitfalls and recommendations for improving efficiency and communication. AJR 1990;155:46572.
24.Roberge, RJ.Facilitating cervical spine radiography in blunt trauma. Emerg Med Clin NA 1991;9:73342.
25.Daffner, RH.Cervical radiography in the emergency department: Who, when, how extensive? J Emerg Med 1993;11:61920.
26.Abrams, HL.The “overutilization” of x-rays. N Engl J Med 1979;300:12136.
27.Gleadhill, DNS, Thomson, JY, Simms, P.Can more efficient use be made of x-ray examinations in the accident and emergency department? Br Med J 1987; 94:9437.
28.Ontario Ministry of Health. The Ontario statistical reporting system 1993–94. Toronto: Ontario Ministry of Health; 1994.
29.Moloney, TW, Rogers, DE.Medical technology: a different view of the contentious debate over costs. N Engl J Med 1979;301: 14139.
30.Angell, M.Cost containment and the physician. JAMA 1985; 254:12037.
31.Changaris, DG.Cervical spine films, cost, and algorithms. Am J Surg 1987;153:478.
32.Woodring, JH, Lee, C.Limitations of cervical radiography in the evaluation of acute cervical trauma. J Trauma 1993;34:329.
33.Advanced Trauma Life Support Instructor Manual. 5 ed. Chicago: American College of Surgeons; 1993.
34.Knopp, RK.Evaluation of the cervical spine: unresolved issues. Ann Emerg Med 1987;16:81920.
35.Sumchai, AP.Selective application of cervical spine radiography in alert victims of blunt trauma: a prospective study. J Trauma 1988; 28:16867.
36.Frye, G, Wolfe, T, Knopp, R, Lesperance, R, Williams, J.Intracranial hemorrhage as a predictor of occult cervical-spine fracture. Ann Emerg Med 1994;23:797801.
37.Williams, J, Jehle, D, Cottington, E, Shufflebarger, C.Head, facial, and clavicular trauma as a predictor of cervical-spine injury. Ann Emerg Med 1992; 21:71922.
38.Ringenberg, BJ, Fisher, AK, Urdaneta, LF, Midthun, MA.Rational ordering of cervical spine radiographs following trauma. Ann Emerg Med 1988;17:7926.
39.Saddison, D, Vanek, VW, Racanelli, JL.Clinical indications for cervical spine radiographs in alert trauma patients. Am Surg 1991;57:3669.
40.Roberge, RJ, Wears, RC.Evaluation of neck discomfort, neck tenderness, and neurologic deficits as indicators for radiography in blunt trauma victims. J Emerg Med 1992;10:5394.
41.Roberge, RJ.Cervical spine radiography after blunt trauma: Is it always needed? Postgrad Med J 1993;93:20512.
42.Rosen, P, Barkin, RM, Danzl, DF, Hockberger, RS, Ling, LJ, Markovchick, V, et al. Emergency medicine: concepts and clinical practice. 4 ed. Toronto: CV Mosby Co; 1998.
43.Tintinalli, JE, Kelen, GD, Stapczynski, JS.Emergency medicine: a comprehensive study guide. 5 ed. Toronto: McGraw-Hill, Inc.; 2000.
44.Roth, BJ, Martin, RR, Foley, K, Barcia, PJ, Kennedy, P.Roentgenographic evaluation of the cervical spine: a selective approach. Arch Surg 1994;129:6435.
45.Domeier, RM, Evans, RW, Swor, RA, Frederiksen, SM.Prospective validation of prehospital spinal clearance criteria. Acad Emerg Med 1995;2:3556.
46.Feinstein, AR.The “chagrin factor” and qualitative decision analysis. Arch Intern Med 1985;145:12579.
47.Stiell, IG, McDowell, I, Nair, RC, Aeta, H, Greenberg, GH, McKnight, RD, et al. Use of radiography in acute ankle injuries: physicians’ attitudes and practice. CMAJ 1992;147:16718.
48.Long, AE.Radiographic decision-making by the emergency physician. Emerg Med Clin NA 1985;3:43746.
49.Tay, SY, Thoo, FL, Sitoh, YY, Seow, E, Wong, HP.The Ottawa Ankle Rules in Asia: validating a clinical decision rule for requesting x-rays in twisting ankle and foot injuries. J Emerg Med 1999;17:9457.
50.Graham, ID, Stiell, IG, Laupacis, A, O’Connor, AM, Wells, GA.Emergency physicians’ attitudes toward the use of clinical decision rules for radiography. Acad Emerg Med 1998;5:13440.
51.Malomo, AO, Shokunbi, MT, Adeloye, A.Evaluation of the use of plain cervical spine radiography in patients with head injury. East Afr Med J 1995;72:1868.
52.Beirne, JC, Butler, PE, Brady, FA.Cervical spine injuries in patients with facial fractures: a 1-year prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995;24:269.
53.Mahadevan, S, Mower, WR, Hoffman, JR, Peeples, N, Goldberg, W, Sonner, R.Interrater reliability of cervical spine injury criteria in patients with blunt trauma. Ann Emerg Med 1998;31:197201.
54.Brand, DA, Frazier, WH, Kohlhepp, WC, Shea, KM, Hoefer, AM, Ecker, MDet al. A protocol for selecting patients with injured extremities who need x-rays. N Engl J Med 1982;306:3339.
55.Hoffman, JR, Mower, W, Wolfson, AB, Todd, K, Zucker, M.Validity of a set of clinical criteria to rule out injury to the cervical spine in patients with blunt trauma. N Engl J Med 2000;343:949.
56.Hoffman, JR, Wolfson, AB, Todd, K, Mower, WR.Selective cervical spine radiography in blunt trauma: methodology of the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study (NEXUS). Ann Emerg Med 1998;32:4619.
57.Stiell, IG, McKnight, RD, Wells, GA, Lesiuk, H, Vandemheen, K, Clement, C, et al. Application of the NEXUS Low-Risk Criteria for cervical spine radiography in Canadian emergency departments. Acad Emerg Med 2000;7;566.
58.Carter, A.Clinical practice guidelines. CMAJ 1992;147:164950.
59.Stiell, IG.A study to develop clinical decision rules for the emergency department use of radiography in acute ankle injuries [thesis]. Ottawa: Univ. of Ottawa; 1991.
60.Stiell, IG, Greenberg, GH, McKnight, RD, Nair, RC, McDowell, I, Worthington, JR.A study to develop clinical decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Ann Emerg Med 1992;21:38490.
61.Stiell, IG, Greenberg, GH, McKnight, RD, Nair, RC, McDowell, I, Reardon, M, et al. Decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries: refinement and prospective validation. JAMA 1993;269:112732.
62.Stiell, IG, McKnight, RD, Greenberg, GH, McDowell, I, Nair, RC, Wells, GA, et al. Implementation of the Ottawa Ankle Rules. JAMA 1994;271:82732.
63.McDonald, CJ.Guidelines you can follow and can trust: an ideal and an example. JAMA 1994;271:8723.
64.Stiell, IG, Wells, G, Laupacis, A, Brison, R, Verbeek, R, Vandemheen, K, et al. A multicentre trial to introduce clinical decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Br Med J 1995;311:5947.
65.Anis, AH, Stiell, IG, Stewart, DG, Laupacis, A.Cost-effectiveness analysis of the Ottawa Ankle Rules. Ann Emerg Med 1995;26: 4228.
66.Stiell, IG, Wells, GA, McDowell, I, Greenberg, GH, McKnight, RD, Cwinn, AA, et al. Use of radiography in acute knee injuries: need for clinical decision rules. Acad Emerg Med 1995;2:96673.
67.Stiell, IG, Greenberg, GH, Wells, GA, McKnight, RD, Cwinn, AA, Cacciotti, T, et al. Derivation of a decision rule for the use of radiography in acute knee injuries. Ann Emerg Med 1995;26:40513.
68.Stiell, IG, Greenberg, GH, Wells, GA, McDowell, I, Cwinn, AA, Smith, NA, et al. Prospective validation of a decision rule for the use of radiography in acute knee injuries. JAMA 1996;275:6115.
69.Nichol, G, Stiell, IG, Wells, GA, Cacciotti, TF, McDowell, I, Laupacis, A.Cost-benefit analysis of implementation of the Ottawa Knee Rule. Acad Emerg Med 1997;4:433.
70.Stiell, IG, Wells, GA, Hoag, RA, Sivilotti, MLA, Cacciotti, TF, Verbeek, RP, et al. Implementation of the Ottawa Knee Rule for the use of radiography in acute knee injuries. JAMA 1997;278: 20758.
71.Greco, PJ, Eisenberg, JM.Changing physicians’ practices. N Engl J Med 1993;329:12714.
72.Guide to Canadian Healthcare Facilities. Ottawa: Canadian Healthcare Association; 1995.
73.Stiell, IG, Wells, GA, Vandemheen, K, Clement, C, Lesiuk, H, De Maio, VJ, et al. The Canadian Cervical Spine Radiography Rule for alert and stable trauma patients. JAMA 2001;286:18418.

Keywords

Canadian C-Spine Rule study for alert and stable trauma patients: I. Background and rationale

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed