Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T02:50:39.990Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Reply: Capital Mobility and Size

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2014

R. A. Mundell
R. A. Mundell*
Affiliation:
McGill University
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes and Memoranda
Information
Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science/Revue canadienne de economiques et science politique , Volume 30 , Issue 3 , August 1964 , pp. 421 - 431
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 In “Capital Mobility and Stabilization Policy Under Fixed and Flexible Exchange Rates,” this Journal, XXIX, no. 4, Nov., 1963, 475–85.

2 Alex N. McLeod, “Capital Mobility and Stabilization Policy Under Fixed and Flexible Exchange Rates: A Comment,” ibid., XXX, no. 3, Aug., 1964, 413–21.

3 The conclusions are literally valid only in a stationary state, but suitable assumptions about relative growth rates of stock variables can justify their application to an economy in which net investment is positive.

4 Under fixed exchange rates fiscal policy and wage-price policy might have to be inverted, in some situations, between employment and balance-of-trade targets; I leave the matter open for its application to the Canadian economy. Note that the balance of trade becomes a separate target when the level of foreign indebtedness becomes a matter for concern.

5 I discussed some of these matters in “Exchange Margins and Economic Policy,” forthcoming in J. C. Murphy, ed., Money in the International Order.

6 The reader can verify that this possibility is not ruled out by the conditions of dynamic stability under the postulates that incomes move in proportion to excess demands and that world interest rates rise in proportion to the excess world demand for money.