Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T10:51:03.752Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Canadian Consumer Price Index: A Reply

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2014

A. D. Holmes*
Affiliation:
Dominion Bureau of Statistics
Get access

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes and Memoranda
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Asimakopulos, A., “The Canadian Consumer Price Index,” this Journal XXIX, 08, 1963, 376–85Google Scholar, hereafter referred to as Review Article.

2 DBS 62-518, The Consumer Price Index for Canada (1949=100) (Revision Based on 1957 Expenditures) (Ottawa, 03, 1961)Google Scholar, hereafter referred to as Consumer.

3 Review Article, 376.

4 Consumer, 7.

5 Review Article, 377.

6 An exception is houses, for which a replacement concept was retained for reasons stated later herein.

7 Review Article, 378.

8 Consumer, 7 (italics are mine).

9 Review Article, 378.

10 Ibid., 379.

11 Ibid.

12 Ibid.

13 Selected References: US Congress, Joint Economic Committee, Government Price Statistics, Hearings, Part 1, Jan. 24, 1961 (Washington, DC, 1981), 35–9.Google Scholar Adelman, Irma and Griliches, Zvi, “On an Index of Quality Change,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, LVI, 09, 1961, 535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Gilbert, Milton, “The Problem of Quality Changes and Index Numbers,” Monthly Labor Review, LXXXIV, 09, 1961, 992.Google Scholar Griliches, Zvi, “Quality Change and Index Numbers: A Critique,” with Reply by Gilbert, Milton, Monthly Labor Review, LXXXV, 05, 1962, 542.Google Scholar Jaszi, George, “An Improved Way of Measuring Quality Change,” Review of Economics and Statistics, XLIV, 08, 1962, 332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

14 Review Article, 380.

15 Ibid.

16 Consumer, 15.

17 Review Article, 382.

18 Ibid., 385.