Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-25T11:03:10.048Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

UTILIZATION OF WESTERN FLOWER THRIPS ALARM PHEROMONE AS A PREY-FINDING KAIROMONE BY PREDATORS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

C.R. Teerling
Affiliation:
Centre for Pest Management, Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada V5A 1S6
D.R. Gillespie
Affiliation:
Agriculture Canada Research Station, Agassiz, British Columbia, Canada V0M 1A0
J.H. Borden
Affiliation:
Centre for Pest Management, Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada V5A 1S6

Abstract

The alarm pheromone of the western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae), is present in the droplet of anal fluid produced by second-instar nymphs when attacked by predators. Because the anal droplet is used in defense against arthropod predators, it was hypothesized that the alarm pheromone (decyl acetate plus dodecyl acetate) acts as a defensive allomone. This hypothesis was refuted by the demonstration that two predators use the pheromone as a prey-finding kairomone. On a leaf arena, Orius tristicolor White (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) increased its rate of turning in response to the pheromone, and spent 25% of its time within 5 mm of a pheromone source. When given a choice between connected leaf discs containing a pheromone- or solvent-treated wick, Amblyseius cucumeris (Oudemans) (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) spent a greater proportion of time on the pheromone-containing disc, suggesting an arrestment effect.

Résumé

La phéromone d’alerte du Thrips des petits fruits, Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) (Thysanoptera : Thripidae), est présente dans la goutelette de fluide anal émise par les larves de deuxième stade lorsqu’elles sont attaquées par des prédateurs. Comme cette goutelette de fluide anal sert de mécanisme de défense contre les arthropodes prédateurs, on a conclu que la phéromone d’alerte (décylacétate plus dodécylacétate) servait d’allomone de défense. Cette hypothèse a été réfutée, car il est possible de démontrer que deux prédateurs utilisent la phéromone comme kaïromone pour localiser les proies : à la surface d’une feuille, Orius tristicolor White (Hemiptera : Anthocoridae) a augmenté sa fréquence de rotation en réaction à la phéromone et passé 25% de son temps à moins de 5 mm d’une source de phéromone. En présence de deux rondelles de feuille reliées, l’une contenant une mèche imbibée de phéromone et l’autre, une mèche imbibée de solvant, Amblyseius cucumeris (Oudemans) (Acarina : Phytoseiidae) a passé une plus grande proportion de son temps sur le disque contenant de la phéromone, ce qui semble indiquer que celle-ci a un effet attirant.

[Traduit par la rédaction]

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bakker, F.M., and Sabelis, M.W.. 1986. Attack success of Amblyseius mckenziei and the stage related defensive capacity of thrips larvae. Mededelingen van de Faculteit Landbouwwetenschappen Rijksuniversiteit Gent 51: 10411044.Google Scholar
Bakker, F.M., and Sabelis, M.W.. 1989. How larvae of Thrips tabaci reduce the attack success of phytoseiid predators. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 50: 4751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunner, J.F., and Burts, E.C.. 1975. Searching behavior and growth rates of Anthocoris nemoralis (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae), a predator of the pear psylla, Psylla pyricola. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 68: 311315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Moraes, G.J., and McMurtry, J.A.. 1985. Chemically mediated arrestment of the predaceous mite Phytoseiulus persimilis by extracts of Tetranychus evansi and Tetranychus urticae. Experimental and Applied Acarology 1: 127138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dicke, M., Sabelis, M.W., and De Jong, M.. 1988. Analysis of prey preference in phytoseiid mites by using an olfactometer, predation models and electrophoresis. Experimental and Applied Acarology 5: 225241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, A.F.G., and Russel, R.J.. 1972. The effectiveness of Anthocoris nemorum and A. confusus (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) as predators of the sycamore aphid, Drepanosiphum platanoides. II. Searching behaviour and the incidence of predation in the field. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 15: 3550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dong, H., and Chant, D.A.. 1986. The olfactory response of predacious phytoseiid mites (Acarina: Gamasina) to a prey tetranychid species. International Journal of Acarology 12: 5155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fye, R.E., and Carranza, R.L.. 1972. Movement of insect predators from grain sorghum to cotton. Environmental Entomology 1: 790791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilkeson, L.A., Morewood, W.D., and Elliot, D.E.. 1990. Current status of biological control in Canadian greenhouses with Amblyseius cucumeris and Orius tristicolor. Section Regionale Ouest Palearctique/West Palearctic Regional Section Bulletin 5: 7175.Google Scholar
Gillespie, D.R. 1989. Biological control of thrips [Thysanoptera: Thripidae] on greenhouse cucumber by Amblyseius cucumeris. Entomophaga 34(2): 185192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagen, K.S., Greany, P., Sawall, E.F. Jr., and Tassan, R.L.. 1976. Tryptophan in artificial honeydews as a source of an attractant for adult Chrysopa carnea. Environmental Entomology 5: 458465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagen, K.S., Sawall, E.F. Jr., and Tassan, R.L.. 1971. The use of food sprays to increase effectiveness of entomophagous insects. Tall Timbers Conference on Ecological Animal Control by Habitat Management, Proceedings 2d: 5781.Google Scholar
Howard, D.F., Blum, M.S., and Fales, M.F.. 1983. Defense in thrips: Forbidding fruitiness of a lactone. Science 220: 335336.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Howard, D.F., Blum, M.S., Jones, T.H., Fales, M.F., and Tomalski, M.D.. 1987. Defensive function and chemistry of the anal exudate of the cuban laural thrips Gynaikothrips ficorum (Marchal). Phytophaga 1: 163170.Google Scholar
Isenhour, D.J., and Yeargan, K.V.. 1981. Interactive behavior of Orius tristicolor [Hem.:Anthocoridae] and Sericothrips variabilis [Thys.:Thripidae]: Predator searching strategies and prey escape tactics. Entomophaga 26: 213219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, T. 1973. Thrips: Their Biology, Ecology and Economic Importance. Academic Press, London and New York. 349 pp.Google Scholar
Peterson, B.S. 1990. The Effect of Host Plant on the Biological Control of Western Flower Thrips by the Predatory Mite, Amblyseius cucumeris. MPM thesis, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C.89 pp.Google Scholar
Rakickas, R.J., and Watson, T.F.. 1974. Population trends of Lygus spp. and selected predators in strip-cut alfalfa. Environmental Entomology 3: 781784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shields, E.J. 1980. Locomotory activity of Orius tristicolor under various intensities of flickering and non-flickering light. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 73: 7477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shields, E.J., and Watson, T.F.. 1980. Searching behavior of female Orius tristicolor. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 73: 533535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suzuki, T., Haga, K., Kodama, S., Watanabe, K., and Kuwahara, Y.. 1988. Secretion of thrips: II. Secretions of three gall-inhabiting thrips (Thysanoptera: Phlaeothripidae). Applied Entomology and Zoology 23: 291297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teerling, C.R., Pierce, H.D. Jr., Borden, J.H., and Gillespie, D.R.. 1993. Identification and bioactivity of alarm pheromone in the western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis. Journal of Chemical Ecology 19(4): 681697.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tellier, A.J., and Steiner, M.Y.. 1990. Control of the western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande), with a native predator Orius tristicolor (White) in greenhouse cucumbers and peppers in Alberta, Canada. Section Regionale Ouest Palearctique/West Palearctic Regional Section Bulletin 5: 209211.Google Scholar