Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T23:34:08.286Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

UN NOUVEAU TINOCALLIS SUR ULMUS, ORIGINAIRE D’ASIE CENTRALE ET SEMBLABLE À T. SALTANS (NEVSKY) (HOMOPTERA: APHIDIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

G. Remaudière ,
F. W. Quednau  and
O. E. Heie
G. Remaudière
Affiliation:
Institut Pasteur, F 75 724 Paris Cedex 15, France
F. W. Quednau
Affiliation:
Centre de foresterie des Laurentides, Service canadien des foêts, C.P. 3800, Sainte-Foy, Québec, Canada G1V 4C7
O. E. Heie
Affiliation:
Institute of Biology, The Royal Danish School of Educational Studies, 101 Emdrupvej, DK-2400 Copenhagen NV, Denmark
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two different species of Tinocallis were previously confused under the name T. saltans (Nevsky). The status of the true T. saltans is established by designation of a lectotype from the Nevsky syntype series. The alate vivipara, embryo, alatoid nymph, male, and ovipara of T. nevskyi sp. nov. are described and compared with T. saltans. The new aphid is known from Iran, Pakistan, and Afghanistan and it recently appeared in Europe. A new synonymy is established: T. yinchuanensis Zhang, 1980 = T. saltans (Nevsky, 1929).

Résumé

Deux différentes espèces de Tinocallis ont été confondues dans le passé sous le nom T. saltans (Nevsky). Le statut de la vraie T. saltans est établi par la désignation d’un lectotype choisi de la série de syntypes de Nevsky. On fournit la description de la vivipare ailée, embryon, nymphe, mâle et ovipare de T. nevskyi sp. nov. qui est comparé avec T. saltans. Le nouveau puceron est connu en Iran, au Pakistan et en Afghanistan, il est apparu récemment en Europe. Une nouvelle synonymie est établie : T. yinchuanensis Zhang, 1980 = T. saltans (Nevsky, 1929).

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 120 , Issue 3 , March 1988 , pp. 211 - 219
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliographie

Çanaçioglu, H. 1975. The Aphidoidea of Turkey. Istanbul Univ. Orman Fak. Yayinlari, 189. 309 pp.Google Scholar
Heie, O.E. 1982. The Aphidoidea (Hemiptera) of Fennoscandia and Denmark. II. The family Drepanosiphidae. Fauna ent. Scandinavica (Scandinavian Science Press) 11. 176 pp.Google Scholar
Higuchi, H. 1972. A taxonomic study of the subfamily Callipterinae in Japan (Homoptera: Aphididae). Insecta Matsumurana 35: 19–126.Google Scholar
Holman, J., et Pintera, A.. 1981. Übersicht der Blattläuse (Homoptera, Aphidoidea) der Rumänischen Sozialistischen Republik. Academie Ved, Praha, studie CSAV 15. 125 pp.Google Scholar
Leclant, F. 1986. Cultures ornementales. Le Puceron du Lagerstroemia, nouveau ravageur pour notre flore. Phytoma — Défense des cultures, pp. 49–50.Google Scholar
Matsumura, S. 1919. New species and genera of Callipterinae (Aphididae) of Japan. Trans. Sapporo Nat. Hist. Soc. 7: 99–115.Google Scholar
Narzikulov, M.N. 1954. Les pucerons de la vallée de Vakhch et les bases scientifiques de la lutte contre les espèces nuisibles (en russe). Tr. A.N. Tadjik. SSR, Stalinabad Inst. Zool. et Parasitol. 15: 1–125.Google Scholar
Nevsky, V.P. 1929. The plant lice of Middle-Asia. III. Zool. Anz. 82: 197–238.Google Scholar
Prior, R.N.B. 1974. Three Japanese aphids introduced to Britain on imported “bonsai” trees. Plant Pathol. 23: 48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quednau, F.W. 1974. Notes on the Lizerini Blanchard with descriptions of new Lizerius and Paoliella species from South America and Africa (Homoptera: Aphididae). Can. Ent. 106: 45–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quednau, F.W. 1979. A list of Drepanosiphine Aphids from the Democratic People's Republic of Korea with taxonomic notes and descriptions of new species (Homoptera). Ann. Zool. 34: 501–525.Google Scholar
Richards, W.R. 1967. A review of the Tinocallis of the world (Homoptera: Aphididae). Can. Ent. 99: 536–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaposhnikov, G.Kh. 1952. Pucerons dendrophiles des zones steppiques et désertiques de la région de l'Oural. Tr. Zool. Inst. A.N. SSR 11: 92–110.Google Scholar
Stroyan, H.L.G. 1979. Additions to the British aphid fauna (Homoptera: Aphidoidea). Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 65: 1–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szelegiewicz, H. 1978. Przeglad systematyczny mszyc polski. Zeszyty problemowe postepow nauk rolniczych. Polska Akademia Nauk. 208. 40 pp.Google Scholar
van Harten, A., et Coceano, P.G.. 1981. On some interesting aphid species (Homoptera: Aphidoidea) trapped in Udine Province, Italy. Boll. Lab. Ent. agr. Filippo Silvestri, Portici 38: 29–51.Google Scholar
Zhang, G.-X, et Zhong, T.-S.. 1980. Six new species of Tinocallis Matsumura and a new species of Sinotherioaphis Zhang, gen. nov. from China (Aphidoidea: Callaphididae). Zool. Res. 1: 429–442.Google Scholar
Zhang, G.-X, et Zhong, T.-S. 1982. New genera and new species of Chinese Callaphididae and Chaitophoridae (Homoptera). Acta Zootaxon. Sin. 7: 67–77.Google Scholar