Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T04:27:49.718Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Techniques for Increasing the Convenience and Sensitivity of Dry-Film Bioassay of Insecticide Residues with Drosophila spp.1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

W. N. Yule
W. N. Yule
Affiliation:
Analytical Chemistry Research Service, Research Branch, Canada Agriculture, Central Experimental Farm, Ottawa, Ontario
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A flightless strain of Drosophila melanogaster Meig. was used with a dry-film bioassay technique for the analysis of dieldrin residues in wheat grain. The flightless fruitflies were much more convenient to handle than a wild strain and the use of a slippery plastic barrier on collecting and sorting dishes avoided the need for immobilising flies by cold or CO2. Experimental evidence is given for the adoption of standardised breeding and handling systems for controlling certain intrinsic factors in the fly population. Also, by controlling such extrinsic factors in the bioassay system as the number of flies per test vial, replication, and holding temperature, a satisfactorily reproducible LD50 of 0.015 μg. dieldrin per vial was obtained. When this technique was applied to the analysis of dieldrin residues in wheat grain, 0.01-0.10 ppm. dieldrin could be conveniently assayed after chromatographic cleanup of a solvent extract of the grain. The accuracy of the bioassay estimates has been confirmed by gas-chromatographic analysis.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 97 , Issue 3 , March 1965 , pp. 269 - 276
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bartlett, B. R. 1951. A new method for rearing Drosophila and a technique for testing insecticides with this insect. J. econ. Ent. 44: 621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busvine, J. R. 1957. A critical review of the techniques for testing insecticides. Commonwealth Institute of Entomology, London.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. E. 1958. Utility of bioassay in the determination of pesticide residues. J. agric. Food Chem. 6: 274–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finney, D. J. 1952. Probit Analysis. Cambridge Univ. Press, London.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. W., and Smallman, B. N.. 1954. Studies on a direct feeding method for use in bioassay of insecticide residues. Canad. Ent. 86: 562–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerolt, P. 1958. Method for breeding, handling and sexing adults of Drosophila melanogaster Mg. as a test insect for bioassay. Bull. ent. Res. 48: 311–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerolt, P. 1963. Influence of relative humidity on the uptake of insecticides from residual films. Nature, Lond. 197: 721.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harwood, R. F., and Areekul, S.. 1957. A rearing trap for producing pomace flies for bioassay of insecticides. J. econ. Ent. 50: 512–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerr, R. W. 1954. Rearing Drosophila melanogaster Mg. for insecticide investigations. Bull. ent. Res. 45: 313–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morley, H. V., and Yule, W. N. (in preparation). Estimation of dieldrin residues in wheat grain by chemical and biological analysis.Google Scholar
Needham, P. H. 1960. An investigation into the use of bioassay for pesticide residues in foodstuffs. Analyst 85: 792–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pielou, D. P. 1962. Note on an escape-proof method for rearing and handling Drosophila melanogaster Meig. Canad. J. Zool. 40: 365–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, Y. P. 1957. Bioassay of pesticide residues, pp. 449–496. In Metcalf, R. L. (ed.), Advances in pest control research (1). Interscience, New York and London.Google Scholar
Sun, Y. P. 1963. Bioassay – Insects. pp. 399–423. In Zweig, G. (ed.), Analytical methods for pesticides, plant growth regulators, and food additives (1). Academic Press, New York and London.Google Scholar
Sun, Y. P., and Panaskie, J. E.. 1954. Drosophila, a sensitive insect, for the microbioassay of insecticide residues. J. econ. Ent. 47: 180–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, Y. P. et al. , 1963. Factors affecting residue-film bioassay of insecticide residues. J. Ass. off. agric. Chem. 46: 530–542.Google Scholar
Tew, R. P., and Sillibourne, J. M.. 1961. Pesticide residues on fruit. 1 – Microbioassay of pesticide residues using the vinegar fly Drosophila melanogaster. J. Sci. Fd Agric. 12: 618–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheatley, G. A., and Hardman, J. A.. 1960. Automatic time/response records with Drosophila. Nature, Lond. 185: 708–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yule, W. N. 1964. Aqueous formulations of pyrethrum for controlling phytophagous Arthropoda – an evaluation using bioassay techniques. Ann. appl. Biol. 53: 15–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar