Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T16:44:24.968Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Synonymy and Color Variation in the Fall Webworm, Hyphantria cunea Drury (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae)1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

R. F. Morris
R. F. Morris
Affiliation:
Forest Entomology and Pathology Laboratory, Fredericton, N.B.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Northern and southern specimens of the fall webworm in eastern North America exhibit color differences in both the adult and larval stages, and have often been referred to Hyphantria textor Harris and H. cunea Drury, respectively. However, they will readily inter-breed and produce viable offspring; differences in wing maculation are not discrete and genitalic differences have not been found; differences in the degree of larval pigmentation are not discrete and depend largely on environmental factors; and the nesting and feeding behaviors are similar. It is therefore concluded that the common webworm (larvae with the head and dorsal tubercles black) in both north and south should be referred to H. cunea, which has priority. A sibling species or race (lighter heads and tubercles and different nesting and feeding habits) occurs sympatrically with cunea in the south and also, rarely, in the north; if it has specific status it cannot be referred to either cunea or textor; so textor is relegated to synonymy.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 95 , Issue 11 , November 1963 , pp. 1217 - 1223
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hardwick, D. F. 1961. Personal communication. Entomology Research Institute, Canada Dept. Agric., Ottawa.Google Scholar
Harris, T. W. 1828. An insect weaver. New England Farmer 7: 33.Google Scholar
Lyman, H. H. 1902. The North American fall webworm. 32nd Ann. Rept. Ent. Soc. Ontario 1901: 57–62.Google Scholar
Morris, R. F. 1963. Predictive population equations based on key-factors. In LeRoux, E. J. et al. Population dynamics of agricultural and forest insect pests. Mem. Ent. Soc. Canad. 32: 16–21.Google Scholar
Morris, R. F.In press. The value of historical data in population research, with particular reference to Hyphantria cunea Drury. Canad. Ent.Google Scholar
Oliver, A. D. 1963. An ecological study of the fall webworm, Hyphantria cunea (Drury), in Louisiana. Ph.D. Thesis, Entomol. Res. Dept., Louisiana State Univ., Baton Rouge.Google Scholar