Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-sv6ng Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-24T03:47:54.131Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Mites of the Genus Proctolaelaps Berlese (Acarina: Blattisociidae) Associated with Forest Insect Pests

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Evert E. Lindquist  and
Preston E. Hunter
Evert E. Lindquist
Affiliation:
Entomology Research Institute, Research Branch, Canada Department of Agriculture, Ottawa, Ontario
Preston E. Hunter
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Univertity of Georgia, Athens
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Six species of Proctolaelaps, found associated with insect pests of pine forests in the southeastern United States, are described and illustrated. These are: P. bickleyi (Bram), P. fiseri Samšinák, P. hystrix (Vitzthum), and three new species, P. dendroctoni, P. dioryctriae, and P. hystricoides. Newly recorded for North America are P. fiseri, P. hystrix, and P. ulmi Hirschmann; distributions for the last two species include British Columbia. Garmania striata Westerboer is synonymized under P. bickleyi; the problem of the lewisi species complex, which includes P. bickleyi, P. lewisi (Garman and McGregor), and P. utahensis (Chant), is noted.

Although the food habits of these and related mites are mostly unstudied, tentative observations indicate that some species are commensals and others are predators of their insect associates. Investigation of such mites and their relationships with forest pests is urged.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 97 , Issue 1 , January 1965 , pp. 15 - 32
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Athias-Henriot, C. 1959. Phytoseiidae et Aceosejidae (Acarina, Gamasina) d'Algérie. III. Contribution aux Aceosejinae. Bull. Soc. Hist. nat. Afr. N. 5: 158–195.Google Scholar
Bram, R. A. 1956. A new predatory mite from insect culture (Acarina, Phytoseiidae). Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 58: 292–294.Google Scholar
Chant, D. A. 1958. Descriptions of six new species of Garmania Nesbitt and Lasioseius Berlese (Acarina: Aceosejidae). Canad. J. Zool. 36: 383–390.Google Scholar
Chant, D. A. 1963. The subfamily Blattisocinae Garman (= Aceosejinae Evans) (Acarina: Blattisocidae Garman) (= Aceosejidae Baker and Wharton) in North America, with descriptions of new species. Canad. J. Zool. 41: 243–305.Google Scholar
Evans, G. O. 1958. A revision of the British Aceosejinae (Acarina: Mesostigmata). Proc. zool. Soc. Lond. 131: 177–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, G. O. 1963. Observations on the chaetotaxy of the legs in the free-living Gamasina (Acari: Mesostigmata). Bull. Brit. Mus. (nat. Hist.), Zool. 10: 275–303.Google Scholar
Garman, P., and McGregor, E. A.. 1956. Four new predaceous mites (Acarina, Phytoseiidae). Bull. S. Calif. Acad. Sci. 55: 7–13.Google Scholar
Hirschmann, W. 1957. Gangsystematik der Parasitiformes. Teil 1. Rumpfbehaarung und Rückenflächen. Acarologie, SchrReihe vergl. Milbenk., Fürth 1, 1–20, I-V pp.Google Scholar
Hirschmann, W. 1959. Gangsystematik der Parasitiformes. Teil 2. Mundwerkzeuge und Hypostombestimmungstafeln. Acarologie, SchrReihe vergl. Milbenk., Fürth 2, 1–23, I-II pp.Google Scholar
Hirschmann, W. 1962. Gangsystematik der Parasitiformes. Teil 5. Gamasiden. Acarologie, SchrReihe vergl. Milbenk., Fürth 5, 1–56 pp.Google Scholar
Hirschmann, W., and Rühm, W.. 1953. Milben und Fadenwürmer als Symphoristen und Parasiten des Buchdruckers. Mikrokosmos 43: 7–10.Google Scholar
Hirschmann, W., and Rühm, W.. 1954. Milben und Fadenwürmer als Symphoristen und Parasiten des Buchdruckers (Ips typographus). Nachr. naturw. Mus. St. Aschaffenburg 43: 41–50.Google Scholar
Novák, V. 1960. Die natürlichen Feinde und Krankheiten des gemeinen Nutzholzborkenkäfers Trypodendron lineatum Oliv. Zool. Listy 9: 309–322.Google Scholar
Russo, G. 1938. VI. Contributo alla conoscenza dei Coleotteri Scolitidi. Fleotribo: Phloeotribus scarabaeoides (Bern.) Fauv. Parte Seconda, Biografia, simbionti, danni e lotta. Boll. Lab. Ent. agr. Portici 2: 3–420.Google Scholar
Samšinák, K. 1960. Über einige forstwirtschaftlich wichtige Milben der Gattung Proctolaelaps Berlese 1923. Čsl. Parasit. 7: 297–307.Google Scholar
Vitzthum, H. 1923. Acarologische Beobachtungen. 7. Reihe. Kommensalen der Ipiden. Arch. Naturgesch. 89, Abt. A: 97–181.Google Scholar
Westerboer, I. 1963. Abschnitt IV. Die Familie Podocinidae Berlese 1916. Beitr. Syst. Ökol. mitteleurop. Acarina 2, Mesostigmata 1: 179–450.Google Scholar
Willmann, C. 1956. Milben aus dem Naturschutzgebiet auf dem Spieglitzer (Glatzer) Schneeberg. Čsl. Parasit. 3: 211–273.Google Scholar