Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-28T16:47:00.544Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

SAMPLING SYSTEMS FOR EUROPEAN RED MITE, PANONYCHUS ULMI (ACARINA: TETRANYCHIDAE): II. EFFECT OF SPUR CLUSTER SIZE ON MITE DISTRIBUTION1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

H. J. Herbert
Affiliation:
Research Station, Canada Department of Agriculture, Kentville, Nova Scotia
K. P. Butler
Affiliation:
Research Station, Canada Department of Agriculture, Kentville, Nova Scotia

Abstract

The relationship between the distribution of Panonychus ulmi (Koch) and cluster size was examined. As the population intensity increased, P. ulmi numbers and distribution tended to be more closely related to the number of leaves in a cluster.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chant, D. A. 1959. Phytoseiid mites (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Can. Ent. Suppl. 12.Google Scholar
Herbert, H. J. 1970. Limits of each stage in populations of the European red mite, Panonychus ulmi. Can. Ent. 102: 6468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herbert, H. J. and Butler, K. P.. 1973. Sampling systems for European red mite, Panonychus ulmi (Acarina: Tetranychidae), eggs on apple in Nova Scotia. Can. Ent. 105: 15191523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, R. F. 1955. The development of sampling techniques for forest insect defoliators, with particular reference to the spruce budworm. Can. J. Zool. 33: 107223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanford, K. H. and Lord, F. T.. 1962. The influence of spray programs on the fauna of apple orchards in Nova Scotia. XIII. Effects of Perthane on predators. Can. Ent. 94: 928934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van de Vrie, M. 1964. Distribution of phytophagous and predacious mites on leaves and shoots of apple trees. Entomophaga 9: 233238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar