Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T04:22:17.176Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

REVISION OF THE CHIGGER-LIKE LARVAE OF THE GENERA NEOTROMBIDIUM LEONARDI AND MONUNGUIS WHARTON, WITH A REDEFINITION OF THE SUBFAMILY NEOTROMBIDIINAE FEIDER IN THE TROMBIDIIDAE (ACARINA: PROSTIGMATA)1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

E. E. Lindquist
Affiliation:
Entomology Research Institute, Canada Department of Agriculture, Ottawa
P. H. Vercammen-Grandjean
Affiliation:
G. W. Hooper Foundation, University of California, San Francisco

Abstract

The trombidiid subfamily Neotrombidiinae Feider is re-established and redefined, based primarily on larval characters but also on adult characters. It is closely related to the trombidiid Trombellinae on the one hand and to the Leeuwenhoekidae on the other. It consists of two genera, namely Monunguis Wharton, which is monobasic and known only from the larva, and Neotrombidium Leonardi, with 13 described species of which 7 are known from the larva and 8 from the adult (the larva and adult of 2 species are correlated by rearings).The history of the family-level placement of this group, and the controversy over whether or not to recognize two genera, are reviewed. The characters that justify the separate recognition of Monunguis and Neotrombidium are enumerated.The larva of each of the following species of Neotrombidiinae is described, illustrated and keyed: Monunguis streblida Wharton from the Caribbean area, Neotrombidium barringunense Hirst from Australia, N. tricuspidum Borland from North America, N. tenuipes (Womersley) from Malaya, N. samsinaki (Daniel) new combination from central Europe, N. anuroporum new species from Central America, N. bengalense new species from India, and N. tenebrione new species from eastern North America. Six other species of this group, known only from the adult, are listed separately but are not treated taxonomically here.The larvae of Neotrombidiinae parasitize adult insects: those of Monunguis are hyperparasites on streblid flies whereas those of Neotrombidium are ectoparasites of cerambycid, clerid, elaterid, and tenebrionid beetles that pass part of their life history under the bark of trees.In the Microtrombidiinae, Camerotrombidium Thor is noted as the valid replacement name for the preoccupied Ottonia Kramer.

Résumé

La sous-famille Neotrombidiinae Feider, 1955 est redéfinie et rétablie dans la famille Trombidiidae Leach, 1815. Elle occupe une position intermédiaire entre Trombellinae et Leeuwenhoekidae. Elle se répartit en deux genres, à savoir : Neotrombidium Leonardi, 1901, comprenant treize espèces dont deux seules connues de leur cycle ontogénique, cinq de leur seul stade larvaire et six autre de leur seul stade adulte et (ou) nymphal; Monunguis Wharton, 1938, est monotypique et sa larve a été rencontrée deux fois. Ce dernier genre, qui avait été synonymisé avec le premier, en est dégagé ici et les raisons en sont données. Les stades larvaires sont rédécrits et illustrés profusément. Trois nouvelles espèces sont décrites à leur tour.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

André, M. 1958. Acariens Thrombidions (adultes) de l'Angola. Museu do Dundo—Subsidios para o Estudo da Biologia na Lunda, Diamang Publ. Cult. No. 35, 125 pp.Google Scholar
André, M. 1960. Contribution à l'étude des Thrombidions d'Indochine. Acarologia 2: 323326.Google Scholar
Audy, J. R. 1954. Malaysian parasites IX. Notes on the taxonomy of trombiculid mites with description of a new subgenus. Stud. Inst. Med. Res., Malaya 26: 123170.Google Scholar
Audy, J. R. 1957. Malaysian parasites XXXIV. A review of the literature. Stud. Inst. Med. Res., Malaya 28: 427447.Google Scholar
Baker, E. W. and Wharton, G. W.. 1952. An introduction to acarology, 465 pp. Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
Berlese, A. 1912. Trombidiidae. Prospetto dei generi e delle specie finora noti. Redia 8: 1291.Google Scholar
Berlese, A. and Balzan, A.. 1888. Acari Austro-Americani, manipulus primus. Bull. Soc. Ent. Ital. 20: 171222.Google Scholar
Berlese, A. and Leonardi, G.. 1901. Acari sud americani. Zool. Anz. 25: 1218.Google Scholar
Borland, J. G. 1956. The genus Neotrombidium (Acarina: Trombidioidea) in the United States. J. Kansas ent. Soc. 29: 2935.Google Scholar
Crossley, D. A. Jr., 1960. Comparative external morphology and taxonomy of nymphs of the Trombiculidae (Acarina). Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull. 40: 135321.Google Scholar
Daniel, M. 1963. Cockingsia samšiňáki, espèce nouvelle de Leeuwenhoekiidae (Trombidiformes). Acarologia 5: 576581.Google Scholar
Feider, Z. 1955. Fauna Republicii Populare Romîne, Arachnida: Acarina: Trombidoidea. Acad. Rep. Pop. Rom. 5, 189 pp.Google Scholar
Feider, Z. 1958. Prima larva din familia Trombellidae (Acarina) obtinuta prin cultura si despre noua caracterizare a familiei. Stud. si Cercet. Stiint., Biol. si St. Agric., Acad. Rep. Pop. Rom. Filiala Iasi 9: 265282.Google Scholar
Feider, Z. 1959. Étude des caractères sexuels chez les Trombidioidea. Acarologia 1: 5685.Google Scholar
Hirst, S. 1928. LXVIII. On some new Australian mites of the families Trombidiidae and Erythraeidae. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., (10) 1: 563571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirst, S. 1929. 19. Additional notes on Australian motes of the family Trombidiidae, with descriptions of new forms. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. 12: 165176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, P. 1877. Grundzüge zur Systematik der Milben. Arch. Naturgesch. 43: 215247.Google Scholar
Krantz, G. W. 1970. A manual of Acarology, 335 pp. Ore. St. Univ. Book Stores, Corvallis.Google Scholar
Moser, J. C. and Roton, L. M.. Mites associated with southern pine bark beetles in Allen Parish, Louisiana. Can. Ent. (in press).Google Scholar
Oudemans, A. C. 1909. Acarologische Aanteekeningen XXIX. Ent. Ber. 3(50): 1424.Google Scholar
Oudemans, A. C. 1910. Acarologische Aanteekeningen XXX. Ent. Ber. 3(51): 2934.Google Scholar
Oudemans, A. C. 1912. Acarologische Aanteekeningen XLIV. Ent. Ber. 3(68): 291292.Google Scholar
Oudemans, A. C. 1929. Acarologische Aanteekeningen XCV. Ent. Ber. 7(165): 393399.Google Scholar
Radford, C. D. 1950. Systematic check list of mite genera and type species. Int. Union Biol. Sci. (Ser. C, Ent.), No. 1, 232 pp.Google Scholar
Southcott, R. V. 1954. The genus Neotrombidium (Acarina: Leeuwenhoekiidae) I. Description of the ovum and larva of Neotrombidium barringunense Hirst 1928, with an account of the biology of the genus. Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 77: 8997.Google Scholar
Southcott, R. V. 1957. The genus Neotrombidium (Acarina: Leeuwenhoekiidae) II. Further notes on systematics, with a description of a new species from North Queensland. Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 80: 156164.Google Scholar
Thor, Sig. 1935 a. Übersicht und Einteilung der Familie Trombidiidae W. E. Leach 1814 in Unterfamilien. Zool. Anz. 109: 107112.Google Scholar
Thor, Sig. 1935 b. Änderung des Namens einer Unterfamilie der Trombidiidae W. E. Leach 1814. Zool. Anz. 110: 47.Google Scholar
Thor, Sig. 1936 a. Neue Gattungen in der Familie Trombidiidae W. E. Leach 1814. Zool. Anz. 114: 2932.Google Scholar
Thor, Sig. 1936 b. Eine neue Camerotrombidium-Art aus den Gebirgen von Mauritius. Zool. Anz. 115: 106108.Google Scholar
Thor, Sig and Willmann, C.. 1947. Acarina. Trombidiidae. Das Tierreich 71 b: xxiv–xxxvi + 187541.Google Scholar
Vercammen-Grandjean, P. H. 1968. The chigger mites of the Far East (Acarina: Trombiculidae & Leeuwenhoekiidae), 135 pp. Special Study, U.S. Army Med. Res. Dev. Command, Washington, D.C.U.S. Govt. Printing Office.Google Scholar
Vitzthum, H. 1929. 5. Ordnung: Milben, Acari. Tierwelt Mitteleur. 3, Lief. 3, Abt. 7, 112 pp.Google Scholar
Vitzthum, H. 1931. 9. Ordnung der Arachnida: Acari = Milben. In Kükenthal, Handb. Zool. 3, H. 2, Teil 3, Lief. 1, 160 pp.Google Scholar
Vitzthum, H. 19401943. Acarina. Bronn's Kl. Ordn. Tierreichs 5, Abt. 4, Buch 5, 1011 pp. in 7 Lief.Google Scholar
Wharton, G. W. 1938. X. Acarina of Yucatan caves. Carnegie Inst. Wash. Publ. 491: 137152.Google Scholar
Wharton, G. W. 1947. 31. The relationship between trombiculid and trombidiid mites. J. Parasit. 33, Sect. 2 (Suppl.): 1516.Google ScholarPubMed
Wharton, G. W. and Fuller, H. S.. 1952. A manual of the chiggers. Mem. ent. Soc. Wash., No. 4, 185 pp.Google Scholar
Wharton, G. W., Jenkins, D. W., Brennan, J. M., Fuller, H. S., Kohls, G. M., and Philip, C. B.. 1951. The terminology and classification of trombiculid mites (Acarina: Trombiculidae). J. Parasit. 37: 1331.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Willmann, C. 1940. Eine neue Gattung Valgothrombium. Zool. Anz. 131: 250254.Google Scholar
Womersley, H. 1934. A revision of the trombid and erythraeid mites of Australia with descriptions of new genera and species. Rec. S. Aust. Mus. 5: 179254.Google Scholar
Womersley, H. 1936. Additions to the trombidiid and erythraeid acarine fauna of Australia and New Zealand. J. Linn. Soc. (London) (Zool.) 40: 107121.Google Scholar
Womersley, H. 1937. A revision of the Australian Trombidiidae (Acarina). Rec. S. Aust. Mus. 6: 75100.Google Scholar
Womersley, H. 1944. Notes on and additions to the Trombiculinae and Leeuwenhoekiinae (Acarina) of Australia and New Guinea. Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 68: 82112.Google Scholar
Womersley, H. 1945. Acarina of Australia and New Guinea. The family Leeuwenhoekiidae. Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 69: 96113.Google Scholar
Womersley, H. 1954. Malaysian parasites VII. New genera and species, apparently of Apoloniinae (Acarina, Leeuwenhoekiidae), from the Asiatic-Pacific region. Stud. Inst. Med. Res., Malaya 26: 108119.Google Scholar
Womersley, H. and Kohls, G. M.. 1947. New genera and species of Trombiculidae from the Pacific Islands. Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 71: 312.Google Scholar