Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-19T17:08:40.824Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Revision of Hodostates (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae: Ctenopelmatinae), with a discussion of tribal placement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 January 2012

Mika D. Cameron  and
Robert A. Wharton
Mika D. Cameron
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, United States of America
Robert A. Wharton*
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, United States of America
*
1Corresponding author (e-mail: rawbaw2@neo.tamu.edu).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Hodostates Foerster is revised, representing the first comprehensive comparison of Nearctic and European species. Three species are recognized as valid, and the Nearctic Hodostates rotundatus (Davis) is recorded from Canada for the first time. Hodostates schaffneri Hinz is transferred to Lethades Davis, based largely on ovipositor morphology, and is redescribed. Placement in the tribe Pionini is discussed, given the presence of a deep subapical notch in the ovipositor of both New and Old World species of Hodostates. Host records for Hodostates are reviewed.

Résumé

Nous faisons une révision d’Hodostates Foerster, qui constitue la première comparaison détaillée des espèces néarctiques et européennes. Nous reconnaissons la validité de trois espèces et signalons pour la première fois la présence de l’espèce néarctique Hodostates rotundatus (Davis) au Canada. Nous déplaçons Hodostates schaffneri Hinz dans le genre Lethades Davis surtout à cause de la morphologie de l’oviscapte et redécrivons l’espèce. Nous discutons de l’inclusion des Hodostates dans la tribu des Pionini à cause de la présence, tant chez les espèces du Nouveau que de l’Ancien Monde, d’une échancrure profonde et subapicale sur l’oviscapte. Nous réexaminons la liste des hôtes d’Hodostates.

[Traduit par la Rédaction]

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 143 , Issue 2 , April 2011 , pp. 136 - 156
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aubert, J.F. 2000. Les Ichneumonides ouest-paléarctiques et leurs hôtes, 3, Scolobatinae (= Ctenopelmatinae) et suppl. aux volumes précédents. Litterae Zoologicae, Lausanne, 5: 1–310.Google Scholar
Balhoff, J., Yoder, M.J., and Seltman, K. 2006. mx beta version [online]. Available at http://sourceforge.net/projects/mx-database/ [accessed 4 November 2010].Google Scholar
Barron, J.R. 1994. The Nearctic species of Lathrolestes (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Ctenopelmatinae). Contributions of the American Entomological Institute, 28(3): 1–135.Google Scholar
Carlson, R.W. 1979. Family Ichneumonidae. In Catalog of Hymenoptera in America north of Mexico. Prepared under the direction of Krombein, K.V., Hurd, P.D. Jr., Smith, D.R., and Burks, B.D.. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C. pp. 315–740.Google Scholar
Carlson, R.W. 1980. The dates of publication of Foerster's generic synopsis and Tschek's Pim-plariae paper (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae). Polskie Pismo Entomologiczne, 50: 121–126.Google Scholar
Cresson, E.T. 1928. The types of Hymenoptera in the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia other than those of Ezra T. Cresson. Memoirs of the American Entomological Society, 5: 1290.Google Scholar
Dalla Torre, C.G. 1901. Catalogus Hymenopterorum. Volumen III. Trigonalidae, Megalyridae, Stephanidae, Ichneumonidae, Agriotypidae, Evaniidae, Pelecinidae. G. Engelmann, Lipsiae. pp. 1–544.Google Scholar
Davis, G.C. 1897. A review of the ichneumonid subfamily Tryphoninae. Transactions of the American Entomological Society, 24: 193–348.Google Scholar
Eichhorn, O. 1988. Untersuchungen ueber die Fichtengespinstblattwespen Cephalcia spp. Panz. (Hym., Pamphiliidae). Journal of Applied Entomology, 105: 105–140. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0418.1988.tb00166.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitton, M.G. 1982. A catalogue and reclassification of the Ichneumonidae (Hymenoptera) described by C.G. Thomson. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Entomology series, 45(1): 1–119.Google Scholar
Foerster, A. 1869. Synopsis der Familien und Gattungen der Ichneumonen. Verhandlungen des Naturhistorischen Vereins der Preussischen Rheinlande und Westfalens, 25: 135–221.Google Scholar
Gauld, I.D. 1984. An introduction to the Ichneumonidae of Australia. British Museum (Natural History), London.Google Scholar
Gauld, I.D. 1987. Some factors affecting the composition of tropical ichneumonid faunas. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 30: 299–312. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.1987.tb00304.x.Google Scholar
Gauld, I.D. 1997. The Ichneumonidae of Costa Rica, 2. Memoirs of the American Entomological Institute (Gainesville) No. 57.Google Scholar
Gauld, I.D., and Wahl, D.B. 2006. The relationship and taxonomic position of the genera Apolophus and Scolomus (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Zootaxa, 1130: 35–41.Google Scholar
Graham, A.R. 1953. Biology and establishment in Canada of Mesoleius tenthredinis Morley (Hym.: Ichneumonidae), a parasite of the larch sawfly, Pristiphora erichsonii Htg. (Hym.: Tenthredinidae). Report of the Quebec Society for the Protection of Plants, 35: 61–75.Google Scholar
Habermehl, H. 1925. Beitraege zur Kenntnis der palaearktischen Ichneumonidenfauna. Konowia, 4: 1–19.Google Scholar
Heath, J. 1961. Some parasites of Eriocraniidae (Lep.). Entomologist's Monthly Magazine, 97: 163.Google Scholar
Hinz, R. 1976. Zur Systematik und Oekologie der Ichneumoniden V. Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift, 23: 99–105. doi:10.1002/mmnd.19760230111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinz, R. 1996a. Uebersicht ueber die europaeischen Arten von Lethades Davis (Insecta, Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Ctenopelmatinae). Spixiana, 19: 271–279.Google Scholar
Hinz, R. 1996b. Zur Systematik einiger Ctenopelmatinae (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae). Nachrichtenblatt der Bayerischen Entomologen, 45: 75–78.Google Scholar
Kasparayan, D.R. 1981. 11. Subfam. Ctenopelmatinae (Scolobatinae). In Keys to insects of the European part of the USSR. Vol. III. Hymenoptera. Part 3. Ichneumonidae. G.S. Medvedev. Nauka, Leningrad. pp. 316–351. [In Russian.]Google Scholar
Kasparyan, D.R. 1996. Nomenclatural notes on some species of Pimplinae, Tryphoninae, and Ctenopelmatinae (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Zoosystematica Rossica, 5: 196.Google Scholar
Kasparyan, D.R., and Khalaim, A.I. 2007. 52.Ichneumonidae: 14. Subfam. Ctenopelmatinae (Scolobatinae). In Keys to insects of Russian Far East. Vol. IV. Neuropteroidea, Mecoptera, Hymenoptera. Part 5. P.A. Ler. Nauka, Vladivostok. pp. 474–559. [In Russian.]Google Scholar
Kazmierczak, T. 1991. Ichneumonidae (Hymenoptera) of the surroundings of Gastein in the Alps. Part II. Acta Zoologica Cracoviensia, 34: 65–98.Google Scholar
Kolarov, J.A. 1983. A contribution to the studies on subfamily Ctenopelmatinae (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae) in Bulgaria. Acta Zoologica Bulgarica, 22: 36–48. [In Russian.]Google Scholar
Meyer, N.F. 1936. Parasitic Hymenoptera in the family Ichneumonidae of the USSR and adjacent countries. Part 5. Tryphoninae. Opredeliteli Faune SSSR, 21(5): 1–340. [In Russian.]Google Scholar
Perkins, J.F. 1962. On the type species of Foerster's genera (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), 11: 385–483.Google Scholar
Pschorn-Walcher, H., and Zinnert, K.D. 1971. Investigations on the ecology and natural control of the larch sawfly (Pristiphora erichsonii Htg., Hym.; Tenthredinidae) in central Europe. Technical Bulletin of the Commonwealth Institute of Biological Control, 14: 1–50.Google Scholar
Quicke, D.L.J., Laurenne, N.M., Fitton, M.G., and Broad, G.R. 2009. A thousand and one wasps: a 28S rDNA and morphological phylogeny of the Ichneumonidae (Insecta: Hymenoptera) with an investigation into alignment parameter space and elision. Journal of Natural History, 43: 1305–1421. doi:10.1080/00222930902807783.Google Scholar
Rohwer, S.A. 1915. Descriptions of new species of Hymenoptera. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 49(2105): 205–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffner, U., Boeve, J., Gfeller, H., and Schlunegger, U.P. 1994. Sequestration of Veratrum alkaloids by specialists Rhadinoceraea nodicornis Konow (Hymenoptera: Tenthredinidae) and its ecoethological implications. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 20: 3233–3250. doi:10.1007/BF02033723.Google Scholar
Taeger, A., and Blank, S.M. 2008. ECatSym — Electronic World Catalog of Symphyta (Insecta, Hymenoptera). Program version 3.9, data version 34 (05.09.2008). Digital Entomological Information, Müncheberg, Germany.Google Scholar
Thomson, C.G. 1883. XXXII. Bidrag till kaennedom om Skandinaviens Tryphoner. Opuscula Entomologica, 9: 873–936.Google Scholar
Thomson, C.G. 1888. XXXVII. Bidrag till Sveriges insectfauna. Opuscula Entomologica, 12: 1202–1265.Google Scholar
Townes, H. 1969. Genera of Ichneumonidae. Part I. Memoirs of the American Entomological Institute (Gainesville), No. 11.Google Scholar
Townes, H. 1970. Genera of Ichneumonidae. Part III. Memoirs of the American Entomological Institute (Gainesville), No. 13.Google Scholar
Townes, H., and Townes, M. 1951. Family Ichneumonidae. In Hymenoptera of America north of Mexico — synoptic catalog. Edited by Muesebeck, C.F.W., Krombein, K.V., and Townes, H.K.. United States Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Monograph No. 2. United States Government Printing Office, Washington D.C. pp. 184–409.Google Scholar
Townes, H.K. Jr., 1945. A catalogue and reclassification of the Nearctic Ichneumonidae (Hymenoptera). Part II. The subfamilies Mesoleiinae, Plectiscinae, Orthocentrinae, Diplazontinae, Metopiinae, Ophioninae, Mesochorinae. Memoirs of the American Entomological Society, 11: 478–925.Google Scholar
Viereck, H.L. 1914. Type species of the genera of Ichneumon flies. United States National Museum Bulletin No. 83.Google Scholar
Viereck, H.L. 1921. First supplement to “Type species of the genera of Ichneumon-flies.” Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 59: 129–150.Google Scholar
Vikberg, V., and Koponen, M. 2000. On the taxonomy of Seleucus Holmgren and the European species of Phrudinae (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Entomologica Fennica, 11: 195–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wharton, R. 2010. Hodostates taxon page [online]. Available from http://peet.tamu.edu/projects/8/public/public_content/show/9245?content_template_id=33 [accessed 4 November 2010].Google Scholar
Wharton, R.A., Cammack, J.A., and Mullins, P.A. 2010. A revision of the westwoodiine genus Pergaphaga (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae, Ctenopelmatinae). Zookeys, 37: 35–68. doi:10.3897/zookeys.37.313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoder, M., Dole, K., and Deans, A. 2006. Introducing ‘mx’, a sharable digital workbench for systematic biologists. Proceedings of Taxonomic Database Working Group [online]. Available from http://www.tdwg.org/proceedings/article/view/38/0 [accessed 1 September 2009].Google Scholar
Yu, D., and Horstmann, K. 1997. Catalogue of world Ichneumonidae (Hymenoptera). Memoirs of the American Entomological Institute (Gainesville), No. 58.Google Scholar
Yu, D.S., van Achterberg, K., and Horstmann, K. 2005. World Ichneumonoidea 2004: taxonomy, biology, morphology and distribution. Taxapad 2005.Google Scholar
Zhaurova, K., and Wharton, R.A. 2009. Recognition of Scolobatini and Westoodiini (Hymenoptera, Ctenopelmatinae) and revision of the component genera. Contributions of the American Entomological Institute, 35(5): 1–77.Google Scholar