Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T23:45:38.857Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

RELATIONSHIP OF AMBIENT TEMPERATURES TO DIEL PERIODICITIES OF SEX ATTRACTION IN SIX SPECIES OF LEPIDOPTERA1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Abstract

Field studies of male sex attraction rhythms in Argyrotaenia velutinana and five other lepidopterous species reveal that the diel periodicity was modified by ambient temperature. The temperature near the mean hour of attraction appeared to be the most important environmental parameter correlated to the shift in rhythmicity.

Résumé

Des études en plein champ sur le rythme circadien d’attraction sexuelle chez Argyrotaenia velutinana et cinq autres espèces de Lépidoptères montrent que l’heure d’expression du rythme est modifiée par les températures ambiantes. La température aux environs de l’heure d’attraction semble être le paramètre météorologique le plus important en corrélation avec ce rajustement du rythme.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Batiste, W. C. 1970. A timing sex-pheromone trap with special reference to codling moth collections. J. econ. Ent. 63: 915918.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Batiste, W. C., Olson, W. H., and Berlowitz, A.. 1973. Codling moth: Influence of temperature and daylight intensity on periodicity of daily flight in the field. J. econ. Ent. 66: 883892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardé, R. T. 1971 (unpub.). Aspects of reproductive isolation in the Holomelina aurantiaca complex (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae). Ph.D. Thesis, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Cardé, R. T., Comeau, A., Baker, T. C., and Roelofs, W. L.. 1975. Moth mating periodicity: temperature regulates the circadian gate. Experientia 31: 4648.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cardé, R. T., Doane, C. C., and Roelofs, W. L.. 1974. Diel periodicity of male sex pheromone response and female attractiveness in the gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae). Can. Ent. 106: 479484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardé, R. T. and Roelofs, W. L.. 1973. Temperature modification of male sex pheromone response and factors affecting female calling in Holomelina immaculata (Lep. Arct.). Can. Ent. 105: 15051512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comeau, A. 1971 (unpub.). Physiology of sex pheromone attraction in Tortricidae and other Lepidoptera (Heterocera). Ph.D. Thesis, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Götz, B. 1941. Neue apparate zum Studium der Insektenphysiologie. Umschau 45: 779781.Google Scholar
Roelofs, W. L. and Comeau, A.. 1970. Lepidopterous sex attractants discovered by field screening tests. J. econ. Ent. 63: 969974.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saario, C. A., Shorey, H. H. and Gaston, L. K.. 1970. Sex pheromones of noctuid moths. XIX. Effect of environmental and seasonal factors on captures of males of Trichoplusia ni in pheromone-baited traps. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 63: 667672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, C. J. and Lucuik, G. S.. 1972. Factors affecting calling by female eastern spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. Ent. 104: 17511762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sower, L. L., Shorey, H. H. and Gaston, L. K.. 1971. Sex pheromone of noctuid moths. XXI. Light: dark cycle regulation and light inhibition of sex pheromone release by females of Trichoplusia ni. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 64: 488492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar