Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-15T23:02:10.627Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Population Dynamics of Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say) in Eastern Ontario: I. Spatial Pattern and Transformation of Field Counts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

D. G. Harcourt
Affiliation:
Entomology Research Institute, Research Branch, Canada Department of Agriculture, Ottawa, Ontario

Abstract

Counts of the Colorado potato beetle on potato did not conform to the Poisson distribution, there being an excess of uninfested and highly infested hills over the expected numbers. However, when observed distributions were fitted to the negative binomial series, the discrepancies were not significant when tested by chi-square. The negative binomial parameter k tended to increase with density. Using a common k, the distribution of the various stages may be described by expansion of (qpx)k, when values of k are as follows: adult, 1.95; egg mass, 4.10; first instar, 0.68; second instar, 0.78; third instar, 1.04; fourth instar, 1.07.

For all stages, the variance was proportional to a fractional power of the mean. Use of the individual potato stalk as a sample unit had little effect on the skewness of the distribution. Four transformations are offered for stabilizing the variance of field counts.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anscombe, F. J. 1948. The transformation of Poisson, binomial and negative binomial data. Biometrika 35: 246254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anscombe, F. J. 1949. The statistical analysis of insect counts based on the negative binomial distribution. Biometrics 5: 165173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anscombe, F. J. 1950. Sampling theory of the negative binomial and logarithmic series distribution. Biometrika 37: 358382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beall, G. 1940. The fit and significance of contagious distributions when applied to observations on larval insects. Ecology 21: 460474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beall, G. 1942. The transformation of data from entomological field experiments so that the analysis of variance becomes applicable. Biometrika 32: 243262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bethune, C. J. S. 1870. Miscellaneous notes. Canad. Ent. 2: 115.Google Scholar
Bliss, C. I., and Fisher, R. A.. 1953. Fitting the negative binomial distribution to biological data. Biometrics 9: 176200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruneteau, J. 1937. Recherches sur les ennemis naturels du Doryphori en Amérique. Ann. Epiphyt. Phytogén. 3: 114135.Google Scholar
Cole, T. V. 1951. Potato insects and their control in Manitoba. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Manitoba.Google Scholar
Evans, D. A. 1953. Experimental evidence concerning contagious distributions in ecology. Biometrika 40: 186211.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. A. 1941. The negative binomial distribution. Ann. Eugenics 11: 182187.Google Scholar
Franz, J. 1957. Beobachtungen über die natürliche Sterblichkeit des Kartoffelkäfers Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say) in Kanada. Entomophaga 2: 197212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, A., Gorham, R. P., Hudson, H. F., and Flock, J. A.. 1925. The Colorado potato beetle in Canada. Canad. Dept. Agric. Bull. 52, pp. 30.Google Scholar
Harcourt, D. G. 1960. Distribution of the immature stages of the diamondback moth, Plutella maculipennis (Curt.) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae), on cabbage. Canad. Ent. 92: 517521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harcourt, D. G. 1961a. Design of a sampling plan for studies on the population dynamics of the diamondback moth, Plutella maculipennis (Curt.) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). Canad. Ent. 93: 820831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harcourt, D. G. 1961b. Spatial pattern of the imported cabbageworm, Pieris rapae (L.) (Lepidoptera: Pieridae), on cultivated Cruciferae. Canad. Ent. 93: 945952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harcourt, D. G. 1962. Design of a sampling plan for studies on the population dynamics of the imported cabbageworm, Pieris rapae (L.) (Lepidoptera: Pieridae). Canad. Ent. 94: 849859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Healy, M. J. R., and Taylor, H. R.. 1962. Tables for power-law transformations. Biometrika 49: 557559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudon, M., and LeRoux, E. J.. 1961. Variation between samples of immature stages, and of mortalities from some factors, of the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), on sweet corn in Quebec. Canad. Ent. 93: 867888.Google Scholar
Ives, W. G. H., and Turnock, W. J.. 1959. Estimation of cocoon populations of the larch sawfly, Pristiphora erichsonii (Hartig). Canad. Ent. 41: 650661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelleher, J. S. 1960. Life-history and ecology of Doryphorophaga doryphorae (Riley), a tachinid parasite of the Colorado potato beetle. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
LeRoux, E. J., and Reimer, C.. 1959. Variation between samples of immature stages, and of mortalities from some factors, of the eye-spotted bud moth, Spilonota ocellana (D. & S.) (Lepidoptera: Olethreutidae), and the pistol case-bearer, Coleophora serratella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Coleophoridae), on apple in Quebec. Canad. Ent. 91: 428449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, R. F. 1955. The development of sampling techniques for forest insect defoliators, with particular reference to the spruce budworm. Canad. J. Zool. 33: 225294.Google Scholar
Taylor, L. R. 1961. Aggregation, variance and the mean. Nature, Lond. 189: 732735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wadley, F. M. 1950. Notes on the form of distribution of insect and plant populations. Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer. 43: 581586.Google Scholar
Waters, W. E. 1959. A quantitative measure of aggregation in insects. J. Econ. Ent. 52: 11801184.Google Scholar
Waters, W. E., and Henson, W. R.. 1959. Some sampling attributes of the negative binomial distribution with special reference to forest insects. Forest Sci. 5: 397412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar