Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-vt8vv Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-08-18T16:43:11.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

OVIPOSITION RESTRAINT OF MUSCIDIFURAX ZARAPTOR1 (HYMENOPTERA: PTEROMALIDAE) ON PARASITIZED HOUSEFLY PUPAE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

H. G. Wylie
H. G. Wylie
Affiliation:
Research Institute, Canada Department of Agriculture, Belleville, Ontario
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Females of Muscidifurax zaraptor K. & L. oviposit on unparasitized housefly (Musca domestica L.) pupae in preference to those attacked by M. zaraptor, Nasonia vitripennis (Walk.), or Spalangia cameroni Perk. (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). The discrimination against parasitized houseflies is greatest in the case of those attacked by M. zaraptor and least for those parasitized by S. cameroni. Discrimination is based on differences between unparasitized and parasitized pupae that the female parasites detect after they pierce the pupae with the ovipositor. Death of parasitized hosts, or a change resulting directly therefrom, is not responsible for the differences. The fact that hosts pierced at or near the original drilling site are more likely to be rejected than those attacked elsewhere supports the hypothesis that a ’venom’ injected by the female parasites during oviposition diffuses throughout the host and is responsible for oviposition restraint.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 103 , Issue 11 , November 1971 , pp. 1537 - 1544
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Force, D. C. 1970. Competition among four hymenopterous parasites of an endemic insect host. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 63: 1675–1688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kogan, M. and Legner, E. F.. 1970. A biosystematic revision of the genus Muscidifurax (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) with descriptions of four new species. Can. Ent. 102: 1268–1290.Google Scholar
Syme, P. D. 1970. Discrimination by Hyssopus thymus (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) against Orgilus obscurator (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), an internal parasite of the European pine shoot moth, Rhyacionia buoliana (Lepidoptera: Olethreutidae). Can. Ent. 102: 1523–1527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wylie, H. G. 1965. Discrimination between parasitized and unparasitized housefly pupae by females of Nasonia vitripennis (Walk.) (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). Can. Ent. 97: 279–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wylie, H. G. 1967. Some effects of host size on Nasonia vitripennis and Muscidifurax raptor (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). Can. Ent. 99: 742–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wylie, H. G. 1970. Oviposition restraint of Nasonia vitripennis (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) on hosts parasitized by other hymenopterous species. Can. Ent. 102: 886–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wylie, H. G. 1971. Observations on intraspecific larval competition in three hymenopterous parasites of fly puparia. Can. Ent. 103: 137–142.Google Scholar
Wylie, H. G. Larval competition among three hymenopterous parasite species on multiparasitized housefly pupae. (In preparation).Google Scholar