Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T15:35:55.414Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

NOTES ON GENERAL MORPHOLOGY AND TERMINOLOGY OF THE CHIRONOMIDAE (DIPTERA)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Ole A. Saether
Ole A. Saether
Affiliation:
Freshwater Institute, Fisheries Research Board of Canada, Winnipeg, Manitoba
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Some morphological terms and characters of Chironomidae are discussed. The proposed terminology of the head chaetotaxy is more in accordance with that of other Diptera. The term flagellomere is preferred instead of flagellar segment. The morphology and terminology of tentorium, cibarial pump, maxillary palp, ocelli, and thorax including humeral pit are given special attention. Suggested terminology for the male hypopygium is as follows: gonocoxite and gonostylus for the major genital claspers, volsellae (consisting of claspette and endomere) for the appendices, phallapodeme, sternapodeme, and coxapodeme for the endoskeleton and aedeagal lobe for the "Dritte Spange". The term seta is preferred to such terms as hair, bristle, etc. It is suggested that in the larvae the name premandible be retained for the moment. There seems to be strong evidence for applying the term mentum instead of "hypostomial plate", "hypochilum", or "labial plate". The mentum seems to consist of two plates for which the terms ventromentum and dorsomentum are proposed. The "paralabial plates" are parts of the ventromentum and can be termed ventromental plates. A more correct name for the "glossa" seems to be ligula.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 103 , Issue 9 , September 1971 , pp. 1237 - 1260
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abul-Nasr, S. E. 1950. Structure and development of the reproductive system of some species of Nematocera (Order Diptera: Suborder Nematocera). Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. (Ser. B) 234: 339–396.Google ScholarPubMed
Brundin, L. 1947. Zur Kenntnis der schwedischen Chironomiden. Ark. Zool. 39A(3): 1–95.Google Scholar
Brundin, L. 1949. Chironomiden und andere Bodentiere der südschwedischen oligotropher Seen. Ein Beitrag zur Kenntnis der bodenfaunistischen Charakterzüge schwedischer oligotropher Seen. Rep. Inst. Freshw. Res. Drottningholm 30: 1–914.Google Scholar
Brundin, L. 1956. Zur Systematik der Orthocladiinae (Dipt. Chironomidae). Rep. Inst. Freshw. Res. Drottningholm 37: 5–185.Google Scholar
Brundin, L. 1966. Transarctic relationships and their significance as evidenced by chironomid midges. With a monograph of the subfamilies Podonominae and Aphroteniinae and the Austral Heptagyiae. K. svenska Vetenskskad. Handl. (Ser. 4) ll(1) : 1–472.Google Scholar
Cook, E. F. 1944. On the morphology of the larval head of a species of Chironomus (Diptera: Chironomidae). Microentomology 9(2) : 69–77.Google Scholar
Cook, E. F. 1949. The evolution of the head in the larva of the Diptera. Microentomology 14(1): 1–57.Google Scholar
Cook, E. F. 1956. The nearctic Chaoborinae (Diptera: Culicidae). Tech. Bull. Univ. Minn. Agric. exp. Stn, No. 218, pp. 1–102.Google Scholar
Craig, D. A. 1967. The eggs and embryology of some New Zealand Blepharoceridae (Diptera: Nematocera) with reference to the embryology of other Nematocera. Trans. R. Soc. N.Z. 8(18): 191–206.Google Scholar
Craig, D. A. 1969. The embryogenesis of the larval head of Simulium venustum Say (Diptera: Nematocera). Can. J. Zool. 47: 495–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crampton, G. C. 1942. The external morphology of the Diptera. In Guide to the insects of Connecticut. VI: The Diptera or true flies of Connecticut. First fascicle. Bull. Conn. St. geol. nat. Hist. Surv. 64: 10–165.Google Scholar
Das, G. M. 1937. The musculature of the mouth-parts of insect larvae. Q. Jl microsc. Sci. 80: 39–80.Google Scholar
DuPorte, E. M. 1962. Origin of the gula in insects. Can. J. Zool. 40: 381–384.Google Scholar
Edwards, F. W. 1929. British non-biting midges (Diptera, Chironomidae). Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 72(2) : 279–430.Google Scholar
Emden, F. van and Hennig, W.. 1970. 21. Diptera. In Tuxen, S.L. (Ed.), Taxonomist's glossary of genitalia in insects, pp. 130–141. 2nd rev. and enlarged edition. Munksgaard, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Fittkau, F. J. 1962. Die Tanypodinae (Diptera, Chironomidae). (Die Tribus Anatonyniini, Macropelopiini und Pentaneurini.) Abh. Larvalsyst. Insekten 6: 1–453.Google Scholar
Goetghebuer, M. 1912. Études sur les Chironomides de Belgique. Mém. Acad. r. Sci. Lett. Belg. sér. 2, fasc. VI, T.3: 1–26.Google Scholar
Goetghebuer, M. 1925. Contribution à l'étude des “prémandibules” chez les larves des Diptères némocères. Encycl. ent., Sér. B, II, Diptera, t.1(3), pp. 143–157.Google Scholar
Goetghebuer, M. 1928. Diptères (Nématocères). Chironomidae. III: Chironomariae. Faune Fr. 18, 174 pp.Google Scholar
Gouin, F. J. 1957. Études sur l'anatomie de la tête larvaire de quelques Chironomidae (Dipt. Nematoc.). I: Les structures Chironomines. Annls Soc. ent. Fr. 125: 105–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gouin, F. J. 1959. Morphology of the larval head of some Chironomidae (Diptera, Nematocera). Smithson. misc. Collns 137: 175–201.Google Scholar
Hamilton, A. L. An analysis of a freshwater benthic community with special reference to the Chironomidae. II: Taxonomy of the Chironomidae of Marion Lake, British Columbia, 216 pp. Ph.D. Thesis (1965), Dept. Zool., Univ. Brit. Columb., Vancouver, B.C. (Unpub.)Google Scholar
Hansen, D. and Cook, E. F.. (MS). A revision of the nearctic species of Diamesa Meigen (Chironomidae, Diptera).Google Scholar
Hoyt, C. P. 1952. The evolution of the mouth parts of adult Diptera. Microentomology 17: 61–125.Google Scholar
Idris, B. E. M. 1960. Die Entwicklung im normalen Ei von Culex pipiens L. (Diptera). Z. Morphol. Ökol. Tiere 49: 387–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imms, A. D. 1938. On the antennal musculature in insects and other arthropods. Q. Jl microsc. Sci. 81: 273–320.Google Scholar
Ivanova-Kazas, O. M. 1949. Embryonic development of Anopheles maculipennis Mg. (In Russian.) Izv. Akad. Nauk. SSR (Biol.) 2: 140–170.Google Scholar
Jobling, B. 1928. The structure of the head and mouth parts in Culicoides pulicaris L. (Diptera: Nematocera). Bull. ent. Res. 18(3): 211–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johannsen, O. A. 1903. Aquatic nematocerous Diptera. Bull. N.Y. St. Mus. 68: 328–448.Google Scholar
Johannsen, O. A. 1905. Aquatic nematocerous Diptera. II: Chironomidae. Bull. N.Y. St. Mus. 86: 76–327.Google Scholar
Lehmann, J. 1969. Die europäischen Arten der Gattung Rheocricotopus Thien. et Harn. und drei neue Artvertreter dieser Gattung aus der Orientalis (Diptera, Chironomidae). Bull. N.Y. St. Mus. 66: 348–381.Google Scholar
Matsuda, R. 1965. Morphology and evolution of the insect head. Mem. Am. ent. Soc., No. 4, 334 pp.Google Scholar
Matsuda, R. 1970. Morphology and evolution of the insect thorax. Mem. ent. Soc. Can., No. 76, 413 pp.Google Scholar
Miall, L. C. and Hammond, A. R.. 1900. The structure and life-history of the harlequin fly (Chironomus). Clarendon Press, University of Oxford, 196 pp.Google Scholar
Mozley, S. 1970. Morphology and ecology of the larva of Trissocladius grandis (Kieffer) (Diptera, Chironomidae), a common species in the lakes and rivers of Northern Europe. Arch. Hydrobiol. 67: 433–451.Google Scholar
Pagast, F. 1947. Systematik und Verbreitung der um die Gattung Diamesa gruppierten Chironomiden. Arch. Hydrobiol. 41: 435–596.Google Scholar
Pankratova, V. Ya. 1970. Larvae and pupae of midges of the subfamily Orthocladiinae of the fauna of SSSR (Diptera, Chironomidae = Tendipedidae). Opred. Faune SSSR 102: 1–344.Google Scholar
Peterson, A. 1916. The head-capsule and mouth-parts of Diptera. Ilinois biol. Monogr. 3(2): 1–112.Google Scholar
Reiss, F. 1968. Ökologische und systematische Untersuchungen an Chironomiden (Diptera) des Bodensees. Ein Beitrag zur lakustrischen Chironomidenfauna des nördlichen Alpenvorlandes. Arch. Hydrobiol. 64: 176–323.Google Scholar
Reiss, F. 1969. Krenopsectra fallax gen. n., sp. n. (Diptera, Chironomidae) aus den Alpen und den Pyrenäen. Ann. zool. fenn. 6: 435–442.Google Scholar
Richards, G. 1951. The integument of arthropods. Univ. Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 411 pp.Google Scholar
Rodova, R. A. 1966. Development of Cricotopus silvestris (Diptera, Chironomidae). (In Russian.) In Plankton i bentos. Trudӯ Inst. Biol. Vnutrennikh Vod: 199–213. Moskva.Google Scholar
Rubzov, I. A. 1959–1964. 14. Simuliidae (Melusinidae). Fliegen palaearkt. Reg. 3(4): 1–689.Google Scholar
Sæther, O. A. 1967 a. Notes on the bottom fauna of two small lakes in Northern Norway. Nytt. Mag. Zool. 14: 96–124.Google Scholar
Sæther, O. A. 1967 b. Notes on some nearctic chironomid larvae. Ent. News 78: 197–208.Google Scholar
Sæther, O. A. 1969. Some nearctic Podonominae, Diamesinae, and Orthocladiinae (Diptera: Chironomidae). Bull. Fish. Res. Bd Can., No. 170, 154 pp.Google Scholar
Sæther, O. A. 1971. Nomenclature and phylogeny of the genus Harnischia (Diptera: Chironomidae). Can. Ent. 103: 347–362.Google Scholar
Sæther, O. A. Four new and unusual Chironomidae (Diptera). Can. Ent. (In press.)Google Scholar
Serra-Tosio, B. 1964. Prodiamesa (Monodiamesa) delphinensis n. sp., une nouvelle espèce de Chironomidae (Diptera) de la région grenobloise. Trav. Lab. Hydrobiol. Piscic. Univ. Grenoble 56: 53–59.Google Scholar
Serra-Tosio, B. 1968. Taxonomie phylogénétique des Diamesini: les genres Potthastia Kieffer, Sympotthastia Pagast, Parapotthastia n.g. et Lappodiamesa n.g. (Diptera: Chironomidae). Trav. Lab. Hydrobiol. Piscic. Univ. Grenoble 59–60: 117–164.Google Scholar
Serra-Tosio, B. 1970. Les Diamesa du group dampfi. Description d'une espèce nouvelle (Diptera, Chironomidae). Trav. Lab. Hydrobiol. Piscic. Univ. Grenoble 61: 107–146.Google Scholar
Schiner, I. R. 1864. Die Fliegen (Diptera). Nach der analytische Methode bearbeitet, mit der Charakteristic sämmtlicher europäischer Gattungen, der Beschreibung aller in Deutschland vorkommenden Arten und der Aufzählung aller bisher beschriebenen europäischen Arten. II. Theil. In: Redtenbacher, L. and I. R. Schiner: Fauna Austriaca. 2. Carl Gerold's Sohn., Wien, 658 pp.Google Scholar
Schlee, D. 1968. Vergleichende Merkmalsanalyse zur Morphologie und Phylogenie der Corynoneura—Gruppe (Diptera, Chironomidae). Zugleich eine Allgemeine Morphologie der Chironomiden—Imago (♂). Stuttg. Beitr. Naturk. 180: 1–150.Google Scholar
Shilova, A. I. 1966. The larvae of Odontomesa fulva Kieff. (Diptera, Chironomidae – Orthocladiinae). (In Russian). In: Plankton i bentos. Trudӯ Inst. Biol. Vnutrennikh Vod.: 239–256.Google Scholar
Smith, E. L. 1969. Evolutionary morphology of external insect genitalia. 1. Origin and relationships to other appendages. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 62: 1051–1079.Google Scholar
Smith, E. L. 1970 a. Evolutionary morphology of the external insect genitalia. 2. Hymenoptera. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 63: 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, E. L. 1970 b. 23. Hymenoptera. In: Tuxen, S. L. (ed.): Taxonomist's glossary of genitalia in insects. 2nd rev. and enlarged edition. Munksgaard, Copenhagen. pp. 156–170.Google Scholar
Snodgrass, R. E. 1935. Principles of insect morphology. McGraw-Hill, New York, 667 pp.Google Scholar
Snodgrass, R. E. 1957. A revised interpretation of the external reproductive organs of male insects. Smithson. misc. Collns 135(6) : 1–60.Google Scholar
Snodgrass, R. E. 1960. Facts and theories concerning the insect head. Smithson. misc. Collns 142(1): 1–61.Google Scholar
Snodgrass, R. E. 1965. A textbook of arthropod anatomy. Hafner Publishing Company, New York (Facsimile of the edition of 1952), 363 pp.Google Scholar
Strenzke, K. 1959. Revision der Gattung Chironomus Meig. I. Die Imagines von 15 norddeutschen Arten und Unterarten. Arch. Hydrobiol. 56: 1–42.Google Scholar
Strenzke, K. 1960. Metamorphose und Verwandtschaftbeziehungen der Gattung Clunio Hal. (Dipt.). Annls zool. Soc. zool. -bot. fenn. Vanamo 22: 1–30.Google Scholar
Tokunaga, M. 1932. Morphological and biological studies on a new marine chironomid fly, Pontomyia pacifica, from Japan. Part I. Morphology and taxonomy. Mem. Coll. agric. Kyoto Imp. Univ. 19: 1–56.Google Scholar
Townes, H. K. 1945. The nearctic species of Tendipedini (Diptera, Tendipedidae (= Chironomidae). Am. Midl. Nat. 34(1): 1–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuxen, S. L. (Ed.) 1970. Taxonomist's glossary of genitalia in insects. Second revised and enlarged edition. Munksgaard, Copenhagen, 359 pp.Google Scholar
Wensler, R. J. D. and Rempel, J. G.. 1962. The morphology of the male and female reproductive systems of the midge, Chironomus plumosus L. Can. J. Zool. 40: 199–229.Google Scholar
Zavřel, J. 1932. Praemandibeln einiger Dipterenlarven. Atti II. Congr. Zool. Padova, Archo zool. ital. 16: 1000–1004.Google Scholar
Zavřel, J. 1942. Polypodie der Chironomiden-Puppen. Acta Soc. Sci. nat. Morav. 14: 1–40.Google Scholar