Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T04:45:42.363Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

NOTES ON EUROPEAN LONGITARSUS SPECIES INTRODUCED IN NORTH AMERICA (COLEOPTERA: CHRYSOMELIDAE: ALTICINAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Laurent LeSage
Laurent LeSage
Affiliation:
Agriculture Canada, Biosystematics Research Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0C6
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Ecological data, distribution records, comments, and diagnostic features are given for eight European species of Longitarsus Latreille introduced into North America: L. ferrugineus (Foudras); L. succineus (Foudras); L. luridus (Scopoli); L. jacobaeae (Waterhouse); L. ganglbaueri Heikertinger; L. pratensis (Panzer); L. pellucidus (Foudras); and L. rubiginosus (Foudras). The last two species are reported for the first time in North America.

Résumé

Cette note apporte des données sur l’écologie, la distribution géographique, les caractères distinctifs et quelques remarques concernant huit espèces européennes de Longitarsus Latreille introduites en Amérique du Nord : L. ferrugineus (Foudras), L. succineus (Foudras), L. luridus (Scopoli), L. jacobaeae (Waterhouse), L. ganglbaueri Heikertinger, L. pratensis (Panzer), L. pellucidus (Foudras), et L. rubiginosus (Foudras). Ces deux dernières espèces sont signalées pour la première fois en Amérique du Nord.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 120 , Issue 12 , December 1988 , pp. 1133 - 1145
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anonymous. 1981 a. New U.S. detection in high hazard area. Plant Pest News 1(2): 2–3.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1981 b. Longitarsus luridus extends range. Plant Pest News 1(3): 2.Google Scholar
Bedel, L. 1898 (1889–1901). Faune des Coléoptères du Bassin de la Seine. Tome V. Société entomologique de France, Paris. 420 pp.Google Scholar
Brown, W.J. 1967. Notes on the extralimital distribution of some species of Coleoptera. Can. Ent. 99: 85–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buhr, H. 1954. Zur Kenntnis der Biologie und der Verbreitung minierender Käfer. Arch. Freunde NatGesch. Mecklenb. 1: 289–380.Google Scholar
Fogato, W., and Leonardi, C.. 1980. Coleotteri Crisomelidi della Brughiera di Rovasenda (Piemonte). pp. 25–73in Quaderni sulla “Struttura delle zoocenosi terrestri” — 1. La Brughiera pedemontana.Google Scholar
Foudras, A.1859–1860. Altisides. Ann. Soc. linn. Lyon (nouvelle série) 6: 157–384.Google Scholar
Fowler, C. 1890. The Coleoptera of the British Isles. Volume IV. L. Reeve and Co., London. 411 pp., + pl. 99–142.Google Scholar
Frick, K.E. 1970. Ragwort flea beetle established for biological control of tansy ragwort in northern California. Calif. Agric. April: 12–13.Google Scholar
Furth, D. 1979. Zoogeography and host plants of Longitarsus in Israel, with descriptions of six new species (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Israel J. Ent. 13: 79–124.Google Scholar
Gentner, L.G. 1925. The mint flea-beetle — Longitarsus menthae, new species. Q. Bull. Mich. agric. Exp. Stn 109: 1–2.Google Scholar
Gentner, L.G. 1926 a. The mint flea-beetle. Spec. Bull. agric. Exp. Stn Mich. St. Coll. 155: 1–13.Google Scholar
Gentner, L.G. 1926 b. New North American Halticinae (Coleoptera) with notes on other species. Can. Ent. 58: 149–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentner, L.G. 1928. The systematic status of the mint flea-beetle (Chrysom., Coleop.) with additional notes. Can. Ent. 60: 264–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, P., Wilkinson, A.T.S., and Myers, J.H.. 1984. Senecio jacobaea L., Tansy ragwwort (Compositae). pp. 195–201 in Kelleher, J.S., and Hulme, M.A. (Eds.), Biological Control Programmes Against Insects and Weeds in Canada 1969–1980. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough, England. 410 pp.Google Scholar
Hawkes, R.B., and Johnson, G.R.. 1978. Longitarsus jacobaeae aids moth in the biological control of tansy ragwort. Appl. Ent. (Series A) 66: 193–196.Google Scholar
Heikertinger, F. 1912. Skizzen zur Systematik und Nomenklatur der palaarktischen Halticinen. Ent. Blätt. 8: 291–297.Google Scholar
Heikertinger, F. 1926. Resultate fünfzehnjähriger Untersuschungen uber die Nahrungspflanzen einheimischer Halticinen. Ent. Blätt. 22: 1–9.Google Scholar
Heikertinger, F. 1929. Eine Fahrt zum IV. Internationalen Entomologen-Kongress in Ithaca N.-Y., U.S.A. Koleopt. Rdsch. 15: 42–61.Google Scholar
Heikertinger, F., and Csiki, E.. 1940. Coleopterorum Catalogus. Volume XXV, partes 166 et 169: Chrysomelidae: Halticinae. Schenkling, S. (Ed.), W. Junk, s'Gravenhage, Holland. 635 pp.Google Scholar
Horion, Ad. 1951. Verzeichnis der Kafer Mitteleuropas. A.K. Verlag, Stuggart. 536 pp.Google Scholar
Jolivet, P. 1953. Les Chrysomeloidea (Coleoptera) des Iles Baléares. Mém. Inst. r. Sci. nat. Belg. (Sér. 2) 50: 1–88.Google Scholar
Jolivet, P. 1967. Notes systématiques et écologiques sur les Chrysomélides marocains (Coleoptera) (2e note). Bull. Soc. Sci. nat. phys. Maroc. Trimestres 3/4 (1966): 305–393.Google Scholar
Jolivet, P. 1973. Essai d'analyse écologique de la faune chrysomélidienne de la Corée. Cah. Pacif. 17: 253–288.Google Scholar
Král, J. 1973. Ergebnisse der zoologischen Forschungen von Dr. Z. Kaszab in der Mongolei. 329. Alticidae III. (Coleoptera). Folia ent. hung. (suppl.) 26: 111–133.Google Scholar
Kutschera, F. 1864. Beiträge zur Kenntniss der europaischen Halticinen. Wien. Ent. Monats. 8: 269–288.Google Scholar
Leonardi, C. 1973. Longitarsus bertii nome nuovo per il L. ferrugineus (Foudras) sensu Kaszab (Coleoptera, Chyrsomelidae). Atti Soc. ital. Sci. nat. Museo civ. Stor. nat. Milano 114: 465–474.Google Scholar
Leonardi, C. 1976. Descrizione di un nuovo Alticino europeo: Longitarsus noricus n. sp. Atti Soc. ital. Sci. nat. Museo civ. Stor. nat. Milano 117: 239–250.Google Scholar
LeSage, L., and Harrison, A.D.. 1980. The biology of Cricotopus (Chironomidae: Orthocladiinae) in an algalenriched stream: Part 1. Normal biology. Arch. Hydrobiol. Suppl. 57: 375–418.Google Scholar
Liebmann, W. 1955. Käferfunde aus Mitteleuropa einschliesslich des österreichschen Alpen. Arnstadt. 165 pp.Google Scholar
Lindroth, C.H. 1957. The faunal connections between Europe and North America. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York. 344 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lopatin, I.K. 1963. Die Chrysomeliden (Coleoptera) Afghanistans auf Grund der Ergebnisse der Forschungsreise des Herrns J. Klapperich in den Jahren 1952/53. Annls hist.-nat. Mus. natn. hung. 55: 349–377.Google Scholar
Lopatin, I.K. 1967. 106. Chrysomelidae der III. Expedition Ergebnisse der zoologischen Forschungen von Dr. Z. Kaszab in der Mongolei (Coleoptera). Reichenbachia 9: 157–169.Google Scholar
Lopatin, I.K. 1977. Leaf beetles of Central Asia and Kazakhstan. Fauna USSR 113: 4–268. [Translation, 1984.]Google Scholar
Lopatin, I.K. 1984. Chrysomelidae aus dem Himalaya (Coleoptera). Entomologia Brasiliensia 9: 328–339.Google Scholar
Lopatin, I.K., and Tadzhibayev, M.. 1972. The leaf beetles (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) of the low-mountain areas of Tajikistan. Ent. Rev. Wash. 51: 355–358. [English translation of Ent. Obozr.]Google Scholar
Malkin, B. 1943. Some new records of Oregon Chrysomelidae. Pan-Pacif. Ent. 19: 74.Google Scholar
Mohr, K.H. 1962. Bestmmungstabelle und Faunistik der mitteleuropaischen Longitarsus Arten. Ent. Blätt. 58: 55–118.Google Scholar
Mohr, K.H. 1965. Ergebnisse der Albanien-Expedition 1961 des Deutschen Entomologischen Institutes. 39. Beitrag (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae, Halticinae. Beit. Ent. 15: 701–729.Google Scholar
Mohr, K.H. 1966. 88. Familie: Chrysomelidae. in Freude, H., Harde, K.W., and Lohse, G.A. (Eds.), Die Käfer Mitteleuropas Band 9. Goecke & Evers, Krefeld, Germany. 299 pp.Google Scholar
Newton, H.C.F. 1933. On the biology of some species of Longitarsus (Col. Chrysom.) Bull. ent. Res. 24: 511–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panzer, G.W.F. 1794. Fauna Insectorum Germanicae initia oder Deutschlands Insecten. Volume 21: 16. Nurnberg.Google Scholar
Peyerimhoff, P. 1915. Notes sur la biologie de quelques coléoptères phytophages du Nord-africain (troisième série). Annls Soc. ent. Fr. 88: 169–260.Google Scholar
Scopoli, J.A. 1763. Entomologica Carniolica. Trattner, Vindobonae. 420 pp.Google Scholar
Shapiro, D.S. 1969. A review of the flea beetles (Coleoptera, Halticinae) of Dagestan and neighboring regions of the Caspian lowland. Ent. Rev. Wash. 48: 162–167. [English translation of Ent. Obozr.]Google Scholar
Shute, S.L. 1975. Longitarsus jacobaeae Waterhouse (Col., Chrysomelidae): identity and distribution. Ent. month. Mag. 111: 33–39.Google Scholar
Shute, S.L. 1980. Wing-polymorphism in British species of Longitarsus beetles (Chrysomelidae: Alticinae). Syst. Ent. 5: 437–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomlin, J.R., and Sharp, W.E.. 1912. Notes on the British species of Longitarsus, Latr. (a genus of Coleoptera). Ent. month. Mag. 48: 2–7, 200–204, 245–253, 278–286.Google Scholar
Warchalowski, A. 1970. Revision der chinesischen Longitarsus-Arten (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae). Annls Zool. 28: 97–152.Google Scholar
Warchalowski, A. 1973. Zweiter Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Halticinen Nordpersiens (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae). Polskie Pismo ent. 43: 659–687.Google Scholar
Warchalowski, A. 1976. Biogeographische Studien über die Blatkäfer der Pontischen Provinz (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae). Polskie Pismo ent. 46: 29–94.Google Scholar
Waterhouse, G.R. 1858. Catalogue of British Coleoptera. Taylor and Francis, London. 117 pp.Google Scholar
Westcott, R.L., Brown, R.E., Sharratt, D.B., and White, R.E.. 1985. Longitarsus: a new species form Oregon and a new record for North America (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Pan-Pacif. Ent. 61: 323–330.Google Scholar
Wilcox, J.A. 1974. Checklist of the beetles of Canada, United States, Mexico, Central America and West Indies. Volume 1, part 7: The Leaf Beetles (Red Version). North American Beetle Fauna Project. The Biological Research Institute of America, Inc., Latham, New York. 166 pp.Google Scholar