Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-c654p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T02:43:41.975Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE LIFE HISTORY OF LESTES CONGENER (ODONATA: ZYGOPTERA) ON THE CANADIAN PRAIRIES1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

W. W. Sawchyn  and
C. Gillott
W. W. Sawchyn
Affiliation:
Saskatchewan Research Council, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
C. Gillott
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Lestes congener Hagen overwinters in the egg stage. There is a diapause just before blastokinesis, during which the egg is extremely resistant to low temperatures and desiccation. Post-diapause embryonic development can occur near 0 °C but will not take place until the eggs are wetted as the pond habitat fills in the spring. Hatching does not occur until the temperature exceeds about 5 °C and is highly synchronous. Larval development is rapid and is completed in the field in about 50 days. Emergence of the adults also is synchronous. Sexual maturation requires 3 weeks. Oviposition occurs immediately after copulation while the pair are still in tandem. It takes place only in dry stems of Scirpus. Adaptations of L. congener for life under rigorous prairie conditions are discussed.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 106 , Issue 4 , April 1974 , pp. 367 - 376
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benke, A. C. 1970. A method for comparing individual growth rates of aquatic insects with special reference to the Odonata. Ecology 51: 328–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbet, P. S. 1964. Temporal patterns of emergence in aquatic insects. Can. Ent. 96: 264–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Z. 1958. Wplyw temperatury na roswój jaj Lestes sponsa Leach (Odonata). Ekol. pol. (B) 4: 305–309. (With English Summary.)Google Scholar
Hales, L. J. 1965. Biological laboratory data. Methuen, London.Google Scholar
Harwood, P. D. 1960. Additional notes on the Odonata (dragonflies) of Ohio. Ohio J. Sci. 60: 341–344.Google Scholar
Kennedy, C. H. 1915. Notes on the life history and ecology of the dragonflies (Odonata) of Washington and Oregon. Proc. U.S. natn. Mus. 49: 259–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kormondy, E. J. 1957. New knowledge of the Odonata in Tennessee. J. Tenn. Acad. Sci. 32: 106–115.Google Scholar
Montgomery, B. E. 1925. Records of Indiana dragonflies. Proc. Indiana Acad. Sci. 31: 383–389.Google Scholar
Sawchyn, W. W. and Church, N. S.. 1973. The effects of temperature and photoperiod on diapause development in the eggs of four species of Lestes (Odonata: Zygoptera). Can. J. Zool. 51: 1257–1265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, E. M. 1940. Preliminary list of the Odonata of Saskatchewan. Can. Ent. 72: 26–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, E. M. 1953. The Odonata of Canada and Alaska, Vol. 1. University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, N. and Thomas, R. C. Jr., 1956. A fixative for use in dissecting insects. Stain Technol. 31: 25–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitehouse, F. C. 1941. British Columbia dragonflies (Odonata), with notes on distribution and habits. Am. Midl. Nat. 26: 488–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar