Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-19T09:53:36.340Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Larval morphology of the Neotropical genus Epispasta (Coleoptera, Meloidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2012

Andrea Di Giulio
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Biologia, Università degli Studi “Roma Tre”, Viale Marconi 446, 00146 Roma, Italy
John D. Pinto
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of California at Riverside, Riverside, California 92521, United States of America
Marco A. Bologna*
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Biologia, Università degli Studi “Roma Tre”, Viale Marconi 446, 00146 Roma, Italy
*
1 Corresponding author (e-mail: bologna@uniroma3.it).

Abstract

The first-instar (triungulin), second-instar, and third-instar larvae of the South American monotypic genus Epispasta Selander, 1960 are described and figured. The triungulin of E. abbreviata (Klug, 1825) is highly adapted for phoresy on bees and resembles the triungulins of several other phoretic genera in the subfamily Meloinae. The second- and third-instar larvae of Epispasta are unique in that they retain the campodeiform phenotype of the first instar. These instars in other meloid genera are scarabaeiform. A discussion is provided on the similarity of the triungulin of Epispasta to that of other phoretic meloines. We argue that this similarity is a result of morphological convergence correlated with phoretic behavior and is not evidence of a relationship. The position of Epispasta in Meloinae remains questionable, as none of its larval or adult features ally it to any other genus.

Résumé

Dans ce travail sont décrits et figurés le premier, deuxième et troisième étages larvaires du genre monotypique Epispasta Selander, 1960, endémisme de l'Amérique du Sud. La larve primaire, ou triungulin, de E. abbreviata (Klug, 1825) c'est très modifié et adapté à la phorésie sur les abeilles sauvages. Le phénomène de convergence morphologique parmi les triungulins phorétiques de la sous-famille Meloinae est aussi discuté. Le deuxième et troisième étages larvaires sont très particulières car elles, case unique parmi les Méloides, gardent le phenotype campodeiforme du triungulin tandis que une phenotype scarabeiforme. Les similitudes entre le triungulin de Epispasta et ceux d'autres Méloines phorétiques sont discutées et indiquent qu'il s'agit de convergence évolutive, corrélée à la phorèsie, plutôt que des relations phylogénétiques. La position du genre Epispasta dans la sous-famille Meloinae n'est pas clarifié par les caractères larvaires. Aussi les caractères des adultes n'aident pas à clarifier des relations étroites avec d'autres genres de ce group taxonomique.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blochtein, B., and Wittmann, D. 1988. Mating site specificity, reproduction and vector selection in Nemognatha nigrotarsata (Col., Meloidae), a nest parasite of leaf-cutter bees and other pollinator of crops in Rio Grande do Sul. Journal of Applied Entomology, 105: 414419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bologna, M.A. 1983. Utilizzazione dei dati biologici nella sistematica dei Meloidae (Coleoptera). Atti XII Congresso Nazionale Italiano di Entomologia Roma (1980), 2: 2136.Google Scholar
Bologna, M.A., and Aloisi, G. 1992. Systematics of Lydomorphus Fairmaire 1882, with description of the first instar larva of L. dusaulti (Dufour 1821) (Coleoptera Meloidae). Tropical Zoology, 5: 5571.Google Scholar
Bologna, M.A., and Aloisi, G. 1994. Systematics and bionomics of Physomeloe Reitter, with description of the first instar larva (Coleoptera Meloidae). EOS-Revista Espanola de Entomologia, 69: 4556.Google Scholar
Bologna, M.A., and Di Giulio, A. 2002. Review of the Southern African genus Prolytta Kaszab, with a description of the first instar larva, and bionomic and taxonomic remarks (Coleoptera, Meloidae). Invertebrate Systematics, 16: 177194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bologna, M.A., and Di Giulio, A. 2003. First instar larval morphology of Prionotolytta binotata (Péringuey, 1888), an endemic southern African species (Coleoptera, Meloidae). African Entomology, 11: 213219.Google Scholar
Bologna, M.A., and Pinto, J.D. 2001. Phylogenetic studies of Meloidae (Coleoptera), with emphasis on the evolution of phoresy. Systematic Entomology, 26: 3372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Church, N.S., Salkeld, E.H., and Rempel, J.G. 1970. The structure of the micropyles of Lytta nuttalli Say and L. viridana LeConte (Coleoptera: Meloidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology, 48: 894895 + 1 plate.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denier, P.C.L. 1935 a. Estudios sobre Meloidos Americanos. Apuntes criticos de sistematica y de nomenclatura. Revista Argentina de Entomologia, 1: 1528.Google Scholar
Denier, P.C.L. 1935 b. Coleopterorum Americanorum familiae Meloidarum enumeratio synonymica. Revista de la Sociedad Entomologica Argentina, 6: 139176.Google Scholar
Denier, P.C.L. 1940. Description de Lytta neivai, n. sp. du Brésil et notes sur quelques Lytta F. de l'Amérique du Sud (Col., Meloidae). Revista de Entomologia (Rio de Janiero), 11: 799802.Google Scholar
Di Giulio, A., Bologna, M.A., and Pinto, J.D. 2002. Larval morphology of Meloe the subgenus Mesomeloe: inferences on its phylogenetic position and a first instar larval key to the Meloe subgenera (Coleoptera: Meloidae). Italian Journal of Zoology, 69: 339344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Giulio, A., Aberlenc, H.P., Vigna Taglianti, A., and Bologna, M.A. 2003. Definition and description of larval types of Cyaneolytta (Coleoptera Meloidae) and new records on their phoretic association with Carabidae (Coleoptera). Tropical Zoology, 16: 165187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, J.B. 1827. Tentamen Conspectus Cantharidiarum. Dissertatio inauguralis, quam pro summis in Medicina et Chirurgia honoribus legitime obtinendis eruditorum examini subjicit Johannes Baptista Fischer, monacensis, bavarus. Lindauer, Monachii.Google Scholar
Klug, J.C.F. 1825. Entomologiae Brasilianae specimen alterum, sistens insectorum coleopterorum nondum descriptorum centuriam. Nova Acta Academiae Caesareae Leopoldino Carolinae Germanicae Naturae Curiosorum, 12: 419476.Google Scholar
Lawrence, J.F. 1991. Order Coleoptera. Immature in sects. Vol. 2. Edited by Stehr, F.W.. Kendal/Hunt, Dubuque, Iowa. pp. 144298.Google Scholar
MacSwain, J.W. 1956. A classification of the first instar larvae of the Meloidae (Coleoptera). University of California Publications in Entomology, 12: 1182.Google Scholar
Parker, J.B., and Böving, A.G. 1924. Blister beetle Tricrania sanguinipennis — biology, descriptions of different stages, and systematic relationship. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 64(23): 140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinto, J.D., and Bologna, M.A. 1999. The New World genera of Meloidae (Coleoptera): a key and synopsis. Journal of Natural History, 33: 569619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinto, J.D., and Selander, R.B. 1970. The bionomics of blister beetles of the genus Meloe and a classification of the New World species. Illinois Biological Monographs, 42: 1222.Google Scholar
Selander, R.B. 1960. Restriction of the genus Lytta Fabricius (Meloidae). The Coleopterists Bulletin, 14: 8086.Google Scholar
Selander, R.B. 1985. Spastomeloe, a new genus of Meloini from Peru (Coleoptera: Meloidae). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society, 58: 668685.Google Scholar
Selander, R.B. 1990. Blister beetles of the genus Pseudopyrota (Coleoptera: Meloidae). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society, 63: 4679.Google Scholar
Selander, R.B. 1991. On the nomenclature and classification of the Meloidae (Coleoptera). Insecta Mundi, 5: 6594.Google Scholar
Selander, R.B., and Mathieu, J.M. 1964. The ontogeny of blister beetles (Coleoptera, Meloidae). I. A study of three species of the genus Pyrota. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 57: 711732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar