Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T04:18:49.505Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

LABORATORY AND FIELD EVALUATION OF A FAST-ACTING INSECT GROWTH REGULATOR AGAINST THE SPRUCE BUDWORM, CHORISTONEURA FUMIFERANA (LEPIDOPTERA: TORTRICIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Arthur Retnakaran
Affiliation:
Forest Pest Management Institute, Canadian Forestry Service, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario P6A 5M7

Abstract

UC-62644, a moult-inhibiting insect growth regulator (IGR) belonging to the benzoylphenylureas, had an EC50 of 0.1 to 0.2 ppm in a meridic diet for the 3rd to 6th larval instars of the spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana Clemens. The effects of the IGR were apparent in less than 48 h after ingestion and there was evidence for some contact toxicity. The larvae were unable to discriminate between IGR-treated and untreated diet. Experimental aerial application of the IGR revealed that at <70 g in 4.7 1/ha (1 oz in 0.5 U.S. gal/acre) it effectively controlled spruce budworm populations and afforded foliage protection. These results were comparable with those obtained with Matacil® applied at the recommended rate.

Résumé

L'UC-62644, régulateur de la croissance des insects (RCI) et inhibiteur de la mue qui appartient aux benzoylphénylurées, a une CE50 de 0,1 à 0,2 ppm dans un régime "méridique" (dont certains ingrédients ne sont pas chimiquement définis) à l'égard des larves de la tordeuse des bourgeons de l'épinette (Choristoneura fumiferana Clemens) du 3e au 6e stades. Ses effets se manifestent mois de 48 h après l'ingestion, et on remarque une certaine toxicité de contact. Les larves ne peuvent pas le déceler. Un arrosage aérien expérimental a révélé que moins de 70 g dans 4,7 L/ha (1 on dans 0,5 gai É.-U./ac) du produit peuvent enrayer les populations de tordeuses et protéger le feuillage. Ces résultats sont comparables à ceux qu'a donnés le Matacil® appliqué selon la dose recommandée.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, W. S. 1925. A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J. econ. Ent. 18: 265267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granett, J. and Dunbar, D. M.. 1975. TH 60–40: Laboratory and field trials for control of gypsy moth. J. econ. Ent. 68: 99102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granett, J. and Retnakaran, A.. 1977. Stadial susceptibility of eastern spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), to the insect growth regulator Dimilin®. Can. Ent. 109: 893894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grisdale, D. 1970. An improved laboratory method of rearing large numbers of spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. Ent. 102: 11111117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maas, W., van Hes, R., Grosscurt, A. C., and Deal, D. H.. 1980. Benzoylphenylurea insecticides. Chem. Pflanzenschut. Schadl. 6: 423470.Google Scholar
McMorran, A. 1965. A synthetic diet for the spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Clem.) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. Ent. 97: 5862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randall, A. P. 1980. A simple device for collecting aerial-spray deposits from calibration trials and spray operations. Can. For. Serv. Bi-mon. Res. Notes 36: 23.Google Scholar
Retnakaran, A. 1970. The male reproductive system of the spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) 1. Spermatogenesis. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 63: 851859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Retnakaran, A. 1978. Insect growth regulators as control agents for the eastern spruce budworm. Misc. Rep. Maine Life Sci. agric. Exp. Stn 198: 930.Google Scholar
Retnakaran, A. 1979. Effect of a new moult inhibitor (EL-494) on the spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. Ent. 111: 847850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Retnakaran, A. 1980. Effect of 3 new moult-inhibiting insect growth regulators on the spruce budworm. J. econ. Ent. 73: 520524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Retnakaran, A. 1981. Toxicology and efficacy of insect growth regulators aerially applied against the spruce budworm at Hearst (1978), Wawa (1979) and the French River area (1980). Inf. Rep. FPM-X-45. 60 pp.Google Scholar
Retnakaran, A., Granett, J., and Robertson, J.. 1980. Possible physiological mechanisms for the differential susceptibility of two forest lepidoptera to diflubenzuron. J. Insect. Physiol. 26: 385390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Retnakaran, A., Kaupp, W., and Howse, G.. 1978. Experimental aerial application of insect growth regulators against the spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Clemens) in Thessalon (1976) and Hearst (1977). Inf. Rep. FPM-X-19. 22 pp.Google Scholar
Retnakaran, A. and Smith, L.. 1975. Morphogenetic effects of an inhibitor of cuticle development on the spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. Ent. 107: 883886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rentakaran, A., Smith, L.Tomkins, B., and Granett, J.. 1979. Control of forest tent caterpillar, Malacosoma disstria (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae), with Dimilin®. Can. Ent. 111: 841846.Google Scholar
Sanders, C. J. 1980. A summary of current techniques used for sampling spruce budworm populations and estimating defoliation in Eastern Canada. Inf. Rep. O-X-306. 33 pp.Google Scholar
Stehr, G. 1954. A laboratory method of rearing the spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Clem.) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. Ent. 86: 423428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilcox, H. III. and Coffey, T. Jr. (compiled by). 1978. Environmental impacts of diflubenzuron (Dimilin®) insecticide. Forest Insect and Disease Management, U.S.D.A. For. Serv. Broomall, Pa. 18 pp.Google Scholar