Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T13:43:02.890Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

HOST SPECIFICITY AND BIOLOGY OF UROPHORA CARDUI (DIPTERA: TEPHRITIDAE). A BIOCONTROL AGENT FOR CANADA THISTLE (CIRSIUM ARVENSE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

D. P. Peschken  and
P. Harris
D. P. Peschken
Affiliation:
Research Station, Canada Department of Agriculture, Regina, Saskatchewan
P. Harris
Affiliation:
Research Station, Canada Department of Agriculture, Regina, Saskatchewan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The biology of Urophora cardui (L.) (Diptera: Tephritidae) and its suitability as a biocontrol agent for Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop.) were investigated. The incubation period of the eggs was 4.3 days at 27 °C. Crowding did not significantly reduce the longevity of the adults, the number of eggs laid, or the egg hatch. U. cardui overwinters as a mature larva in the gall but pupation and further development ensue when the larvae are exposed to air by opening the gall. The roots of single and double-galled plants weighed 65 and 78% less and the combined weights of the stem and leaves 47 and 58% less respectively than plants without galls. U. cardui is monophagous: it oviposits into Canada thistle and if kept without this host, into the closely related weeds Cirsium vulgare (Savi) Ten. and Carduus acanthoides L. U. cardui is a promising biological control agent and should be released in Canada.

Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop.) is a widespread noxious weed in Canada and the northern United States. This paper reports on the biology of Urophora cardui (L.), a European tephritid, and its suitability for introduction into Canada to aid in the control of the thistle.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 107 , Issue 10 , October 1975 , pp. 1101 - 1110
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bess, H. A. and Haramoto, F. H.. 1972. Biological control of pamakani, Eupatorium adenophorum, in Hawaii, by a tephritid gall fly, Procecidochares utilis. 3. Status of the weed, fly and parasites of the fly in 1966–1967. Proc. Hawaiian ent. Soc. 21: 165–178.Google Scholar
Bezzi, M. 1923. The genus Urophora Robineau-Desvoidy in America (Diptera: Trypaneidae). Trans. Am. ent. Soc. 49: 1–6.Google Scholar
Clapham, A. R., Tutin, T. G., and Warburg, E. F.. 1962. Flora of the British Isles, 2nd ed. Cambridge, University Press. XLVIII + 1269.Google Scholar
Curtis, J. 1828. British entomology: being illustrations and descriptions of the genera of insect found in Great Britain. Vol. 5, No. 241. London.Google Scholar
Dirlbeck, K. and Dirlbeck, J.. 1964. Notizen zum Vorkommen der Bohrfliegen (Diptera, Trypetidae) an der Schwarzmeerküste der Sowjetunion. Acta faun. ent. Mus. nat. Prague 10 (87): 5–12.Google Scholar
Gifford, J. R. and Trahan, G. R.. 1969. Staining technique for eggs of rice water weevils oviposited intracellularly in the tissue of the leaf sheaths of rice. J. econ. Ent. 62(3): 740–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, P. 1971. Biological control of weeds. Envir. Lett. 2(2): 75–88.Google Scholar
Harris, P. 1973. The selection of effective agents for the biological control of weeds. Can. Ent. 105: 1495–1503.Google Scholar
Harris, P. and Zwölfer, H.. 1968. Screening of phytophagous insects for biological control of weeds. Can. Ent. 100(3): 295–303.Google Scholar
Hendel, F. 1927. Trypetidae. In Linder Die Fliegen der palaearktischen Region. 49. Lieferung 16–19. Stuttgart. pp. 1–221.Google Scholar
Houard, C. 1909. Les zoocecidies des Plantes d'Europe et du Bassin de la Méditerranée, V. II. Librairie Scientifique A. Hermann, Paris. pp. 571–1248.Google Scholar
Peschken, D. P. and Beecher, R. W.. 1973. Ceutorhynchus litura (Coleoptera: Curculionidae): Biology and first releases for biological control of the weed Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) in Ontario, Canada. Can. Ent. 105: 1489–1494.Google Scholar
Phillips, V. T. 1946. The biology and identification of trypetid larvae (Diptera: Trypetidae). Mem. Am. ent. Soc., No. 12. 161 pp.Google Scholar
Quentin, R. M. 1954. Remarques liminaires sur les galles de Cirsium arvense Scop. dues a Urophora cardui Linné. Bull. Soc. ent. 57:(9/10): 147–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redfern, M. 1968. The natural history of spear thistle-heads. Fld Stud. 2: 669–717.Google Scholar
Ruppolt, W. 1958. Gallenentwicklung an Cirsium arvense L. im Winter hervorgerufen durch Euribia cardui L. (Trypetidae). Naturwissenschaften 45: 275–276.Google Scholar
Ulrich, A. et al. , 1958. Effects of climate on sugar beets grown under standardized conditions. J. Am. Soc. Sug. Beet Technol. 10: 1–23.Google Scholar
Varley, G. C. 1937. The life history of some trypetid flies with descriptions of the early stages (Diptera). Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. (A) 12: 109–122.Google Scholar
Zetterstedt, J. W. 1847. Diptera Scandinavia, Vol. VI. Lund. pp. 2163–2580.Google Scholar
Zwölfer, H. 1965. Preliminary list of phytophagous insects attacking wild Cynareae (Compositae) species in Europe, pp. 81–154. Tech. Commun. Commonw. Inst. biol. Control, No. 6.Google Scholar
Zwölfer, H. 1967. Observations of Urophora cardui L. (Trypetidae). Weed Projects for Canada. Progr. Rep. XIX. Commonw. Inst. Biol. Control, Delémont. 11 pp.Google Scholar
Zwölfer, H., Englert, W., and Pattullo, W.. 1970. Investigations on the biology, population ecology and distribution of Urophora cardui L. Weed Projects for Canada. Prog. Rep. XXVII. Commonw. Inst. Biol. Control, Delémont. 17 pp.Google Scholar