Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T01:12:15.890Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

HEAT TOLERANCE OF LAST-INSTAR LARVAE OF THE LARCH SAWFLY, PRISTIPHORA ERICHSONII (HYMENOPTERA: TENTHREDINIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

R. J. Heron
R. J. Heron
Affiliation:
Forest Research Laboratory, Department of Forestry and Rural Development, Winnipeg, Manitoba
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Laboratory tests of heat tolerance of last-instar larvae of the larch sawfly, Pristiphora erichsonii (Htg.), were made to provide information for the evaluation of the role of high temperature as a mortality factor in field populations.

Test larvae were reared from eggs at 21 ± 1.5 °C and 50 ± 10% relative humidity. LT50's were determined at 37°, 39°, 40°, and 41 °C for larvae conditioned at 30 °C and 75% relative humidity.

Larvae were less heat resistant during the first 24 hours after molting than they were 24 to 48 hours after molting. The conditioning temperature and the duration of conditioning had very significant effects on heat tolerance. Differences in acclimation due to heat treatment could not be accounted for by differences in free water content.

Temperature acclimation will occur in field populations and must be considered in evaluating the role of high temperature as a natural mortality factor.

Larvae may encounter lethal temperatures when wandering on branches or tree trunks or crawling on dry ground in open sunshine.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 99 , Issue 11 , November 1967 , pp. 1150 - 1156
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Drooz, A. T. 1960. The larch sawfly, its biology and control. Tech. Bull. U.S. Dep. Agric., No. 1212Google Scholar
Duncan, D. B. 1955. Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics 11: 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edney, E. B. 1964. Acclimation to temperature in terrestrial isopods I. lethal temperatures. Physiol. Zoöl. 37: 364–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, S. A. 1956. The larch sawfly in the Lake States. Forest Sci. 2: 132–160.Google Scholar
Heilbrunn, L. V. 1943. An outline of general physiology. 2nd ed. p. 424. W. B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia and London.Google Scholar
Ives, W. G. H. 1963. Effects of defoliation on survival of larvae of the larch sawfly, Pristiphora erichsonii (Htg.). Can. Ent. 95: 887–892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, C. Y. 1956. Extension of multiple range tests to group means with unequal numbers of replications. Biometrics 12: 307–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Litchfield, J. T., and Wilcoxon, F.. 1949. A simplified method of evaluating dose-effect experiments. J. Pharmac. exp. Ther. 95: 99–113.Google Scholar
Mellanby, K. 1954. Acclimatization and the thermal death point in insects. Nature, Lond. 173: 582–583.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Solomon, M. E. 1945. The use of cobalt salts as indicators of humidity and moisture. Ann. appl. Biol. 32: 75–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winston, P. W., and Bates, D. H.. 1960. Saturated solutions for the control of humidity in biological research. Ecology 41: 232–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar