Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-07T13:21:22.431Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fitness consequences of feeding-by-remating interactions in female Cerambyx welensii (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae: Cerambycinae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 April 2024

Luis M. Torres-Vila Open the ORCID record for Luis M. Torres-Vila [Opens in a new window]
Luis M. Torres-Vila*
Affiliation:
Servicio de Sanidad Vegetal, Consejería de Agricultura GyDS, Junta de Extremadura, Avenida Luis Ramallo s/n, 06800 Mérida, Badajoz, Spain
*
Emails: luismiguel.torres@juntaex.es; luismiguel.torresvila@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The longhorn beetle, Cerambyx welensii (Küster) (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae), is considered a critical factor in oak decline in southwestern Iberia, but populations vary over space and time, depending on several ecological factors. Adults feed on ripe fruits and tree exudates, and evidence suggests that feeding could impact fitness in hot, dry summers, especially under climate change. In the present study, we assessed the impact of adult feeding (sugar-fed, water-fed, or unfed) and remating (monandrous versus polyandrous) on female reproductive output. Lifetime fecundity increased with female size in most feeding–remating combinations. Sugar-fed females achieved the highest longevity and fecundity, unfed females the lowest, and water-fed females had intermediate values. The daily fecundity pattern was strongly dependent on female feeding. Longevity and fecundity of once-mated and remated females were similar in both unfed and water-fed groups; however, in sugar-fed females, remating enhanced fecundity and shortened life span. Preoviposition, oviposition, and postoviposition periods were distinctly affected by both diet and remating. Results show that females require sugar to maximise reproductive output and that a water supply may partially mitigate the fitness decline of unfed females. We conclude that female feeding must be considered to explain C. welensii spatio-temporal occupancy–abundance patterns in oak woodlands.

Type
Research Paper
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 156 , 2024 , e11
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of Canada

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Subject editor: Leah Flaherty

References

Arnqvist, G. and Nilsson, T. 2000. The evolution of polyandry: multiple mating and female fitness in insects. Animal Behaviour, 60: 145–164. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2000.1446.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bense, U. 1995. Longhorn beetles: illustrated key to the Cerambycidae and Vesperidae of Europe. Margraf Verlag, Weikersheim, Germany.Google Scholar
Buse, J., Schröder, B., and Assmann, T. 2007. Modelling habitat and spatial distribution of an endangered longhorn beetle: a case study for saproxylic insect conservation. Biological Conservation, 137: 372–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2007.02.025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, L.F., Millar, J.G., Paine, T.D., and Hanlon, C.C. 2005. Effects of single versus multiple mates: monogamy results in increased fecundity for the beetle Phoracantha semipunctata . Journal of Insect Behavior, 18: 513–527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-005-5609-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavallini, L., Peterson, R.K., and Weaver, D.K. 2023. Dietary sugars and amino acids increase longevity and enhance reproductive parameters of Bracon cephi and B. lissogaster, two parasitoids that specialise on wheat stem sawfly. Physiological Entomology, 48: 24–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/phen.12399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colas, G. 1972. Le Cerambyx cerdo (Col. Cerambycidae) en Provence [Cerambyx cerdo (Col. Cerambycidae) in Provence]. L’Entomologiste, 28: 100–103.Google Scholar
Domínguez, L., López-Pantoja, G., Cremades, D., Paramio, A., Hidalgo, P.J., and Sánchez-Osorio, I. 2022. Incidence of large wood borers in the conservation of dehesa islands forests in southwestern Spain. Forests, 13: 413. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13030413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffy, E.A.J. 1953. A monograph of the immature stages of British and imported timber beetles (Cerambycidae). Jarrold and Sons Ltd., Norwich, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
Fedorka, K.M. and Mousseau, T.A. 2002. Material and genetic benefits of female multiple mating and polyandry. Animal Behaviour, 64: 361–367. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2002.3052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujiwara-Tsujii, N., Yasui, H., and Tanaka, S. 2016. Comparison of fecundity and longevity of Anoplophora malasiaca (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) adults fed on three different host-plants. Entomological Science, 19: 201–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/ens.12191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González, E., Gallego, D., Lencina, J.L., Closa, S., Muntaner, A., and Núñez, L. 2010. Propuesta de una metodología para la determinación de los niveles de infestación por Cerambyx cerdo (Linnaeus 1758) (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) [Method for determining the levels of infestation for Cerambyx cerdo (Linnaeus 1758) (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae)]. Evaluación de los niveles de infestación en Mallorca, año 2009 [Evaluation of the levels of infestation in Mallorca, 2009]. Boletín de Sanidad Vegetal Plagas, 36: 157–163.Google Scholar
Grove, S.J. 2002. Saproxylic insect ecology and the sustainable management of forests. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 33: 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gwynne, D.T. 2008. Sexual conflict over nuptial gifts in insects. Annual Review of Entomology, 53: 83–101. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.53.103106.093423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haack, R.A. 2017. Feeding biology of cerambycids. Chapter 3. In Cerambycidae of the world: Biology and pest management. Edited by Q. Wang. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, United States of America. Pp. 105–138. https://doi.org/10.1201/b21851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanks, L.M. and Wang, Q. 2017. Reproductive biology of cerambycids. Chapter 4. In Cerambycidae of the world: Biology and pest management. Edited by Q. Wang. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, United States of America. Pp. 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1201/b21851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellrigl, K. 1974. Cerambycidae, bockkäfer; longhorned beetles, Longicornia [Cerambycidae, longhorn beetles; longhorned beetles, Longicornia]. In Die Forstschädlinge Europas [The forest pests of Europe]. Volume 2. Edited by W. Schwenke. P. Parey, Hamburg, Germany. Pp. 130–202.Google Scholar
Honěk, A. 1993. Intraspecific variation in body size and fecundity in insects: a general relationship. Oikos, 66: 483–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iwabuchi, K. 1988. Mating behavior of Xylotrechus pyrrhoderus Bates (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). IV. Mating frequency, fecundity, fertility, and longevity. Applied Entomology and Zoology, 23: 127–134. https://doi.org/10.1303/aez.23.127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kato, K., Yamada, H., and Shibata, E.I. 2000. Role of female adult size in reproductive fitness of Semanotus japonicus (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Applied Entomology and Zoology, 35: 327–331. https://doi.org/10.1303/aez.2000.327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keena, M.A. 2002. Anoplophora glabripennis (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) fecundity and longevity under laboratory conditions: comparison of populations from New York and Illinois on Acer saccharum . Environmental Entomology, 31: 490–498. https://doi.org/10.1603/0046-225X-31.3.490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kevan, P.G., Helens, S.S., and Baker, I. 1983. Honeybees feeding from honeydew exudate of diseased gambel’s oak in Colorado. Journal of Apicultural Research, 22: 53–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/00218839.1983.11100559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, W.S. 1990. Effects of body size and repeated matings on female milkweed beetle (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) reproductive success. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 83: 1096–1100. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/83.6.1096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linsley, E.G. 1959. Ecology of Cerambycidae. Annual Review of Entomology, 4: 99–138. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.04.010159.000531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
López, V.M. and Hoddle, M.S. 2014. Effects of body size, diet, and mating on the fecundity and longevity of the goldspotted oak borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 107: 539–548. https://doi.org/10.1603/AN13158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
López-Pantoja, G., Domínguez Nevado, L., and Sánchez-Osorio, I. 2008. Mark-recapture estimates of the survival and recapture rates of Cerambyx welensii Küster (Coleoptera Cerambycidae) in a cork oak dehesa in Huelva (Spain). Central European Journal of Biology, 3: 431–441. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11535-008-0044-3.Google Scholar
Lu, W., Wang, Q., Tian, M.Y., Xu, J., Lu, J., Wei, S.G., and Qin, A.Z. 2013. Reproductive traits of Glenea cantor (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae: Lamiinae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 106: 215–220. https://doi.org/10.1603/EC12251.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matsumoto, K. and Irianto, R.S.B. 1998. Adult biology of the albizia borer, Xystrocera festiva Thomson (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae), based on laboratory breeding, with particular reference to its oviposition schedule. Journal of Tropical Forest Science, 10: 367–378.Google Scholar
Mayet, V. 1881. Note sur les moeurs des Cerambyx (Séance du 28 Décembre 1881) [Note on the habits of the Cerambyx (December 28, 1881 session)]. Bulletin des Séances de la Société Entomologique de France, [1881]: 223–225.Google Scholar
Mendizábal, M. 1944. Cerambícidos de interés agrícola (Continuación) [Cerambycids of agricultural interest (continued)]. Boletín de Patología Vegetal y Entomología Agrícola, 12: 436–476.Google Scholar
Millar, J.G., Paine, T.D., Joyce, A.L., and Hanks, L.M. 2003. The effects of Eucalyptus pollen on longevity and fecundity of Eucalyptus longhorned borers (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 96: 370–376. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/96.2.370.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miroshnikov, A.I. 2009. Review of the longicorn beetles, genus Cerambyx Linnaeus, 1758 (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae) of the Caucasus [in Russian]. Lesnoy Vestnik [Moscow State Forest University Bulletin], 5: 43–55.Google Scholar
Monné, M.L., Monné, M.A., and Wang, Q. 2017. General morphology, classification, and biology of Cerambycidae. Chapter 1. In Cerambycidae of the world: Biology and pest management. Edited by Q. Wang. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, United States of America. Pp. 1–70. https://doi.org/10.1201/b21851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, K., Roessingh, P., and Menken, S.B. 2013. Do female life span and fecundity of small ermine moth increase with multiple mating and adult nutrition? Journal of Insect Behavior, 26: 416–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-012-9360-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petermann, J.S. and Gossner, M.M. 2022. Aquatic islands in the sky: 100 years of research on water-filled tree holes. Ecology and Evolution, 12: e9206. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Picard, F. 1929. Coléoptères: Cerambycidae [Beetles: Cerambycidae]. Faune de France [Fauna of France]. Volume 20. P. Lechevalier, Paris, France.Google Scholar
R Core Team. 2021. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available from https://www.R-project.org/ [accessed 18 March 2024].Google Scholar
Rosenheim, J.A., Jepsen, S.J., Matthews, C.E., Smith, D.S., and Rosenheim, M.R. 2008. Time limitation, egg limitation, the cost of oviposition, and lifetime reproduction by an insect in nature. The American Naturalist, 172: 486–496. https://doi.org/10.1086/591677.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Russo, E., Nugnes, F., Vicinanza, F., Garonna, A.P., and Bernardo, U. 2020. Biological and molecular characterization of Aromia bungii (Faldermann, 1835) (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae), an emerging pest of stone fruits in Europe. Scientific Reports, 10: 7112. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63959-9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simmons, L.W., Lovegrove, M., Du, X., Ren, Y., and Thomas, M.L. 2023. Humidity stress and its consequences for male pre- and post-copulatory fitness traits in an insect. Ecology and Evolution, 13: e10244. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, M.T., Bancroft, J., and Tropp, J. 2002. Age-specific fecundity of Anoplophora glabripennis (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) on three tree species infested in the United States. Environmental Entomology, 31: 76–83. https://doi.org/10.1603/0046-225X-31.1.76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Speight, M.C.D. 1989. Saproxylic invertebrates and their conservation. Nature and Environment Series, 42. Council of Europe, Strasbourg, France.Google Scholar
Švácha, P. and Lawrence, J.F. 2014. Cerambycidae Latreille, 1802. In Handbook of Zoology. Volume 3: Morphology and Systematics: Phytophaga. Edited by R.A.B. Leschen and R.G. Beutel. De Gruyter Inc., Berlin, Germany. Pp. 77–177. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110274462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Togashi, K. 1997. Lifetime fecundity and body size of Monochamus alternatus (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) at a constant temperature. Japanese Journal of Entomology, 65: 458–470.Google Scholar
Togashi, K. 2007. Lifetime fecundity and female body size in Paraglenea fortunei (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Applied Entomology and Zoology, 42: 549–556. https://doi.org/10.1303/aez.2007.549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Togashi, K., Appleby, J.E., Oloumi-Sadeghi, H., and Malek, R.B. 2009. Age-specific survival rate and fecundity of adult Monochamus carolinensis (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) under field conditions. Applied Entomology and Zoology, 44: 249–256. https://doi.org/10.1303/aez.2009.249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torres-Vila, L.M. 2013. Polyandry–fecundity relationship in insects: methodological and conceptual problems. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 26: 325–334. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.12048.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Torres-Vila, L.M. 2017. Reproductive biology of the great capricorn beetle, Cerambyx cerdo (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae), a protected but occasionally harmful species. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 107: 799–811. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007485317000323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Torres-Vila, L.M., Mendiola-Díaz, F.J., and Canelo, T. 2023. Cerambyx cerdo and Cerambyx welensii oak-living sympatric populations exhibit species-specific responses to face ecological factors in the wild. Diversity, 15: 545. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15040545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torres-Vila, L.M., Mendiola-Díaz, F.J., Conejo-Rodríguez, Y., and Sánchez-González, Á. 2016. Reproductive traits and number of matings in males and females of Cerambyx welensii (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae), an emergent pest of oaks. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 106: 292–303. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007485315000747.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Torres-Vila, L.M., Mendiola-Díaz, F.J., Moral-García, F.J., and Canelo, T. 2022. Large-scale geostatistical mapping and occupancy-abundance patterns of Cerambyx species threatening SW Spain oak forests. European Journal of Forest Research, 141: 1045–1057. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-022-01487-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torres-Vila, L.M., Mendiola-Díaz, F.J., and Sánchez-González, Á. 2017b. Dispersal differences of a pest and a protected Cerambyx species (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) in oak open woodlands: a mark–recapture comparative study. Ecological Entomology, 42: 18–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/een.12355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torres-Vila, L.M., Rodríguez-Molina, M.C., and Jennions, M.D. 2004. Polyandry and fecundity in the Lepidoptera: can methodological and conceptual approaches bias outcomes? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 55: 315–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-003-0712-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torres-Vila, L.M., Sánchez-González, Á., Merino-Martínez, J., Ponce-Escudero, F., Conejo-Rodríguez, Y., Martín-Vertedor, D., and Ferrero-García, J.J. 2013. Mark–recapture of Cerambyx welensii in dehesa woodlands: dispersal behaviour, population density, and mass trapping efficiency with low trap densities. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 149: 273–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/eea.12133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torres-Vila, L.M., Sánchez-González, Á., Ponce-Escudero, F., Martín-Vertedor, D., and Ferrero-García, J.J. 2012. Assessing mass trapping efficiency and population density of Cerambyx welensii Küster by mark–recapture in dehesa open woodlands. European Journal of Forest Research, 131: 1103–1116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-011-0579-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torres-Vila, L.M., Zugasti-Martínez, C., Mendiola-Díaz, F.J., De-Juan-Murillo, J.M., Sánchez-González, Á., Conejo-Rodríguez, Y., et al. 2017a. Larval assemblages of large saproxylic cerambycids in Iberian oak forests: wood quality and host preference shape resource partitioning. Population Ecology, 59: 315–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10144-017-0592-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vahed, K. 1998. The function of nuptial feeding in insects: a review of empirical studies. Biological Reviews, 73: 43–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.1997.tb00025.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vázquez, F.M., Balbuena, E., Doncel, E., and Ramos, S. 2000. Distribución del melazo en la provincia de Badajoz para la cosecha de bellotas de Quercus rotundifolia Lam. durante 1999 [Distribution of oak honeydew in the province of Badajoz for the harvest of acorns of Quercus rotundifolia Lam. in 1999]. Boletín de Sanidad Vegetal Plagas, 26: 287–296.Google Scholar
Villiers, A. 1978. Faune des Coléoptères de France [French beetle fauna]. Volume 1: Cerambycidae. Encyclopédie Entomologique. Volume 42. Lechevalier, Paris, France.Google Scholar
Vives, E. 2000. Coleoptera Cerambycidae. Fauna Ibérica [Iberian fauna], 12. Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (CSIC), Madrid, Spain.Google Scholar
Wang, Q., Shi, G., and Davis, L.K. 1998. Reproductive potential and daily reproductive rhythms of Oemona hirta (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 91: 1360–1365. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/91.6.1360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Q., Shi, G., Song, D., Rogers, D.J., Davis, L.K., and Chen, X. 2002. Development, survival, body weight, longevity, and reproductive potential of Oemona hirta (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) under different rearing conditions. Journal of Economic Entomology, 95: 563–569. https://doi.org/10.1603/0022-0493-95.3.563.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xu, T., Hansen, L., and Teale, S.A. 2021. Mating and adult feeding behaviour influence pheromone production in female Asian longhorn beetle Anoplophora glabripennis (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Agricultural and Forest Entomology, 23: 276–286. https://doi.org/10.1111/afe.12430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, D.W., Xiao, Z.J., Zeng, B.P., Li, K., and Tang, Y.L. 2019. Insect behavior and physiological adaptation mechanisms under starvation stress. Frontiers in Physiology, 10: 163. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.00163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed