Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T14:12:39.565Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

EFFICACY OF DISULFOTON FOR CONTROL OF THE GREEN PEACH APHID, MYZUS PERSICAE, ON PEPPERS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

W. H. Foott
Affiliation:
Research Station, Canada Department of Agriculture, Harrow, Ontario
F. G. Von Stryk
Affiliation:
Research Station, Canada Department of Agriculture, Harrow, Ontario
P. R. Timmins
Affiliation:
Research Station, Canada Department of Agriculture, Harrow, Ontario

Abstract

In a 3-year study, one annual application of a 10% granular formulation of disulfoton in the soil at a rate of 2 lb actual toxicant per acre controlled M. persicae throughout the entire period that aphids were most prevalent in pepper fields. Some control was observed within a few days of treatment, but effective control did not occur until 2 to 3 weeks after placement of the insecticide. Irrigation increased the initial uptake of disulfoton, but after 2 weeks the degree of control was essentially the same in irrigated and nonirrigated plots.Analyses of fruit samples from treated plots showed that there were no detectable amounts of disulfoton or its oxidation products 42, 50, and 60 days after treatment. These observations suggest that the required interval of 90 days between treatment and harvest could be reduced. Appreciable amounts of the insecticide or its oxidation products were present in the leaves on all sampling dates.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, C. A. 1966. Determination of residues of Guthion in alfalfa by thermionic emission of gas chromatography. Chemagro Corp. Rept. 18.537.Google Scholar
Chisholm, D., and Specht, H. B.. 1967. Effect of application rates of disulfoton and phorate, and of irrigation on aphid control and residues in canning peas. Can. J. Pl. Sci. 47: 175180.Google Scholar
Getzin, L. W., and Chapman, R. K.. 1959. Effect of soils upon the uptake of systemic insecticides by plants. J. econ. Ent. 52: 11601165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, R. N., Morishita, F. S., Besemer, S. T., and Humphrey, W. A.. 1964. Control of thrips and aphids on carnations with systemic insecticides. J. econ. Ent. 57: 357360.Google Scholar
Metcalf, R. L., Reynolds, H. T., Winton, M., and Fukuto, T. R.. 1959. Effects of temperature and plant species upon the rates of metabolism of systemically applied Di-Syston. J. econ. Ent. 52: 435439.Google Scholar
Reynolds, H. T., and Metcalf, R. L.. 1962. Effect of water solubility and soil moisture upon plant uptake of granulated systemic insecticides. J. econ. Ent. 55: 25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ridgway, R. L., Lindquist, D. A., and Bull, D. L.. 1965 a. Effect of method of application on uptake of Di-Syston by the cotton plant. J. econ. Ent. 58: 349352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ridgway, R. L., Gorzycki, L. J., and Lindquist, D. A.. 1965 b. Evaluation of systemic insecticides for cotton insect control. J. econ. Ent. 58: 666669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shanks, C. H. Jr. 1966. Apparent increase in populations of the strawberry aphid caused by phorate and disulfoton. J. econ. Ent. 59: 935937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shorey, H. H. 1963. Soil applications of systemic insecticides for control of the green peach aphid on peppers. J. econ. Ent. 56: 340342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiemerling, K. 1966. Application of Disyston on beets (1962 to 1964). Pflanzenschutz-Nachrichten Bayer (English edition) 19: 69124.Google Scholar
Van Middelem, C. H. 1966. Fare and persistence of organic pesticides in the environment. In Gould, R. F. (ed.), Organic pesticides in thc environment, Chap. 19, pp. 228249. Advances in Chemistry, Sr. 60, Am. Chem. Soc., Washington, D.C.CrossRefGoogle Scholar