Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-gndc8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T08:58:32.678Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE DISTRIBUTION OF AERIALLY-APPLIED SPRAY DEPOSITS IN SPRUCE TREES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

J. A. Armstrong  and
W. N. Yule
J. A. Armstrong
Affiliation:
Forest Pest Management Institute, Forestry Directorate, Environment Canada, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario P6A 5M7
W. N. Yule
Affiliation:
Entomology Department, Macdonald College of McGill University, Quebec H0A 1C0
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A plot of 6 m tall white spruce trees was treated with an aerial application of an oil-base spray containing a non-toxic compound, Tris (2 ethyl hexyl) phosphate (referred to as TOF), which was amenable to gas-liquid chromatographic analysis The spray was formulated and applied at a rate to approximate the eastern Canadian operational spruce budworm control sprays. Meteorological measurements were made in the airspace from mid-crown height to the height of spray emission for the period of spray application and deposition. Spray deposit collection units (kromekote cards and glass plates) were used to record spray deposit at ground level.

Foliage samples and complete branches were taken from each of three trees at a series of heights and each of the four compass quadrants and returned to the laboratory for chemical analysis. Spray deposit was determined in terms of ppm TOF on the foliage. The kromekote cards provided information from which the drop size characteristics of the spray cloud and the deposit in terms of drops/cmK were determined; a colorimetric analysis of spray deposit on the glass plates indicated the volume of spray deposited.

Analysis of the spray deposits on the foliage indicated gradients in deposits with most on the upper, outer, upwind portions of the trees and least on the lower, inner, downwind portions. These differences were significant. These gradients can be attributed to two weather factors (a) the prevailing wind drifting the pesticide cloud through the forest canopy resulting in a filtering to produce a decreasing gradient from upwind to downwind side of the tree, and (b) air eddies around the tree tops resulting in an increased deposit and slight penetration of the spray cloud on the outer downwind portions of the tree.

This study demonstrates that a finely atomized spray applied to a white spruce forest under suitable weather conditions will give a deposit on the outer portions of the tree with a variation of only about 50% in spray deposit but with significantly less deposit on the inner, lower portions of the tree.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 110 , Issue 12 , December 1978 , pp. 1259 - 1267
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armstrong, J. A. 1972. Measurement of air movement and insecticide deposits in the forest. Eighth North-East Aerial Applicators Conference (Cornell Univ., Ithaca, N.Y., 21–23 March 1972), pp. 64–70.Google Scholar
Armstrong, J. A. 1975. Forest meteorological conditions and spray deposition. Proc. V int. Agric. Aviat. Congr. (Kenilworth, U.K. September 1975), pp. 169–176.Google Scholar
Carman, G. E. and Jeppson, L. R.. 1974. Low volume applications to citrus trees: method for evaluation of spray droplet distributions. J. econ. Ent. 67(3): 397–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurtig, H. H. et al. 1953. A field investigation of the relation between the amount of DDT spray deposited, the physical properties of the spray, and its toxicity to larvae of the spruce budworm. Suffield Rep., Defence Res. Bd Can. 176 (pt. 6). 141 pp.Google Scholar
Slack, W. E. 1972. The NAE flying spot scanner/analyzer. DME/NAE Ql. Bull. 1972, 3. 9 pp.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. 1956. Statistical methods. The Iowa State University Press, Ames. 5th ed., 1956. 534 pp.Google Scholar
Yates, W. E., Akesson, N. B., and Cowden, R. E.. 1974 a. Criteria for minimizing drift residues on crops downwind from aerial applications. Trans. ASAE 17(4): 627–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yates, W. E., Ogawa, J. M., and Akesson, N. B.. 1974 b. Spray distributions in peach orchards from helicopter and ground applications. Trans. ASAE 17(4): 633–639, 644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yule, W. N. and Duffy, J. R.. 1972. The persistence and fate of fenitrothion insecticide in a forest environment. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 8(1): 10–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar