Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T09:51:52.971Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A COMPARISON OF THREE METHODS OF MONITORING THE CARROT WEEVIL, LISTRONOTUS OREGONENSIS (LECONTE) (COLEOPTERA: CURCULIONIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

A.B. Stevenson  and
E.S. Barszcz
A.B. Stevenson
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Pest Management Research Centre, PO Box 6000, 4902 Victoria Avenue North, Vineland Station, Ontario, Canada L0R 2E0
E.S. Barszcz
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Pest Management Research Centre, PO Box 6000, 4902 Victoria Avenue North, Vineland Station, Ontario, Canada L0R 2E0
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The carrot weevil, Listronotus oregonensis (LeConte), was monitored at 11 research or commercial carrot plantings at Holland Marsh, Kettleby, Ontario, using three methods, i.e. wooden plate (Boivin) traps to capture adults, carrot root sections placed in the soil to detect oviposition, and recording the numbers of adults present on carrot root sections. All three methods provided similar records of the seasonal pattern of adult activity. At most sites, thresholds used to determine the need for insecticide applications were reached or exceeded soon after the beginning of monitoring.

There were significant linear relationships among the seasonal activity parameters generated by the three methods and between those parameters and percentage injury at harvest. Control programs that would have resulted from the use of each method are discussed.

Résumé

Le Charançon de la carotte, Listronotus oregonensis (LeConte), a été étudié dans 11 plantations commerciales ou expérientales de carottes à Holland Marsh, Kettleby, Ontario, par trois méthodes : utilisation de pièges formés de plaques de bois (Boivin) pour capturer les adultes, enfouissement de tranches de racines de carottes dans le sol pour enregistrer la ponte, dénombrement des adultes présents sur les tranches de racines de carottes. Les trois méthodes ont mené aux mêmes conclusions sur l’activité saisonnière des adultes. À la plupart des endroits, les seuils déterminant la nécessité d’utiliser des insecticides ont été atteints ou dépassés peu après le début du suivi.

Nous avons trouvé des relations linéaires significatives entre les paramètres de l’activité saisonnière générés par les trois méthodes et entre ces paramètres et le pourcentage des dommages causés aux récoltes. Les programmes de lutte qui auraient résulté de chacune de ces méthodes considérée séparément sont examinés.

[Traduit par la Rédaction]

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 129 , Issue 1 , February 1997 , pp. 187 - 194
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boivin, G. 1985. Evaluation of monitoring techniques for the carrot weevil, Listronotus oregonensis (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). The Canadian Entomologist 117: 927–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boivin, G. 1988. Effects of carrot developmental stages on feeding and oviposition of carrot weevil, Listronotus oregonensis (LeConte) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Environmental Entomology 17: 330–336.Google Scholar
Boivin, G., and Brodeur, L.. 1992. Dépistage systématique des ravageurs: Impact sur les pratiques phytosanitaires en cultures maraîchères au Québec. Bulletin Station de Recherche Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu 27: 16 pp.Google Scholar
Cormier, D., Stevenson, A.B., and Boivin, G.. 1996. Seasonal ecology and geographical distribution of Anaphes listronoti and A. victus (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae), egg parasitoids of the carrot weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in central Ontario. Environmental Entomology 25: 1376–1382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghidiu, G.M., and VanVraken, R.W.. 1995. A modified carrot weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) monitoring trap. Florida Entomologist 78: 627–630.Google Scholar
Grafius, E., Otto, M., and Collins, B.. 1983. Detection and Control of Carrot Weevil. Michigan State University Extension Bulletin E–890: 2 pp.Google Scholar
Perron, J.P. 1971. Insect pests of carrots in organic soils of southwestern Quebec with special references to the carrot weevil, Listronotus oregonensis (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). The Canadian Entomologist 104: 1441–1448.Google Scholar
Ryser, B.W. 1975. Investigations Regarding the Biology and Control of the Carrot Weevil, Listronotus oregonensis (LeConte), in New Jersey. M.Sc. thesis, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ. 138 pp.Google Scholar
SAS Institute Inc. 1985. SAS User's Guide: Statistics. Version 5 Edition. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC. 956 pp.Google Scholar
Simonet, D.E. 1981. Carrot weevil management in Ohio vegetables. Ohio Report 66: 83–85.Google Scholar
Stevenson, A.B. 1977. Seasonal history of the carrot weevil, Listronotus oregonensis (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in the Holland Marsh, Ontario. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Ontario 107: 71–78.Google Scholar
Stevenson, A.B. 1985. Early warning system for the carrot weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) and its evaluation in commercial carrots in Ontario. Journal of Economic Entomology 78: 704–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitcomb, W.D. 1965. The Carrot Weevil in Massachusetts: Biology and Control. Bulletin of the Massachusetts Agricultural Experiment Station 550: 30 pp.Google Scholar