Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T01:18:21.567Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Biology and Habits of the Douglas-fir Beetle Parasite, Coeloides brunneri Viereck (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), in Western Oregon12

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Extract

Natural control factors are normally relied on to hold destructive insects below the level of economic damage. When insect control is attempted every effort should be made to prevent injury to beneficial parasites and predators.

The Douglas-fir beetle, Dendroctonus pseudotsugae Hopkins, is an important enemy of Douglas-fir, Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco. Present control practices for the Douglas-fir beetle consist of rapid cutting, transportation, and milling of infested trees so that beetles will be destroyed in the slabs before they emerge to infest other trees. During these operations, natural control agents are often inadvertently destroyed along with the beetles. Because of this fact serious beetle infestations may be unnecessarily prolonged. Detailed knowledge of the life history of the narural control agents and of the effect of logging and milling practices on the populations of beneficial parasites and predators is needed before control practice recommendations, which may be less destructive to the beneficial insects, can be set forth.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bedard, W. D. 1933a. The Douglas-fir beetle — its seasonal history, biology, habits, and control. U.S. Dept. Agric., For. Ins. Field Sta., Coeur D'Alene, Ida. Unpubl. rept.Google Scholar
Bedard, W. D. 1933b. The number of larval instars and the approximate length of the larval stadia of Dendroctonus pseudotsugae Hopk., with a method for their determination in relation to other bark beetles. J. Econ. Ent. 26: 11281134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capek, M., Charvát, K., and Patočka, J.. 1957. Zur Problematik der forstlichen Entomologie in der Slowakei. Anz. Schädlingsk. 30(2): 1723.Google Scholar
DeLeon, Donald. 1935. The biology of Coeloides dendroctoni Cushman (Hymenoptera — Braconidae) an important parasite of the mountain pine beetle (Dendroctonus monticolae Hopk.) Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer. 28: 411424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flanders, S. E. 1939. Environmental control of sex in hymenopterous insects. Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer. 32: 1126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flanders, S. E. 1942. Oösorption and ovulation in relation to oviposition in the parasitic Hymenoptera. Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer. 35: 251266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Jerome C. R. 1957. Introduction to statistical inference. Ann Arbor, Edwards, 553 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, Roger B. 1959. Termination of diapause in the Douglas-fir beetle, Dendroctonus pseudotsugae Hopkins (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), as an aid to continuous laboratory rearing. Can. Ent. 91: 520525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, Roger B. 1962a. A device for measuring the oviposition potential of a bark beetle parasite. Can. Ent. 94: 737738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, Roger B. 1962b. Durations of the immature stadia of Coeloides brunneri (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) at various constant temperatures, with descriptions of the five larval instars. Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer.Google Scholar
Vité, J. P. and Rudinsky, J. A.. 1957. Contribution toward a study of Douglas fir beetle development. For. Sci. 3: 156167.Google Scholar