Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T10:14:43.871Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY OF LAMBDINA FISCELLARIA LUGUBROSA (LEPIDOPTERA: GEOMETRIDAE)1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

D. P. Ostaff ,
J. H. Borden  and
R. F. Shepherd
D. P. Ostaff
Affiliation:
Pestology Centre, Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C.
J. H. Borden
Affiliation:
Pestology Centre, Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C.
R. F. Shepherd
Affiliation:
Pacific Forest Research Centre, Canadian Forestry Service, Victoria, B.C.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Calling by newly emerged female Lambdina fiscellaria lugubrosa (Hulst) began the first evening and commenced 15 h after the onset of light in nature and in a 14L:10D photoperiod regime in the laboratory. Copulation began 0.5 to 1.5 h later, and moths remained in copulation an average of 3.45 h. The internal reproductive system is typical of ditrysian-type Lepidoptera. Mating usually resulted in the transfer of a single, spheroid spermatophore with a long collum. The spermatophore was placed in the bursa copulatrix in such a position that spermatozoa could leave through the aperture into the ductus seminalis. The greatest mating success occurred between 2- to 4-day-old males and females up to 4 days old. Maximum oviposition occurred on the day after mating. Numbers of eggs maturing and being laid were increased after mating. Mean longevity of mated and unmated females in the laboratory was 18.1 and 20.8 days, respectively. Mating success was greatest at a 6:1 male to female sex ratio, and progressively less at a 1:1 and 1:6 sex ratio. Males mated only once in a 24-h period, but were capable of multiple mating. Females usually accepted one spermatophore but occasionally up to three were found.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 106 , Issue 6 , June 1974 , pp. 659 - 665
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benz, G. 1969. Influence of mating, insemination, and other factors on oogenesis and oviposition in the moth, Zeiraphera diniana. J. Insect Physiol. 15: 55–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Callahan, P. S. and Chapin, J. B.. 1960. Morphology of the reproductive systems and mating in two representative members of the Noctuidae with comparison to Heliothis zea. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 53: 763–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doane, C. C. 1968. Aspects of mating behavior of gypsy moth. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 61: 768–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dustan, G. G. 1964. Mating behaviour of the Oriental fruit moth, Grapholitha molesta (Busck). Can. Ent. 96: 1087–1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fatzinger, C. W. and Asher, W. C.. 1971. Mating behavior and evidence for a sex pheromone of Dioryctria abietella [Lepidoptera: Pyralidae (Phycitinae)]. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 64: 612–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gehring, R. D. and Madsen, H. F.. 1963. Some aspects of mating and oviposition behavior of the codling moth, Carpocapsa pomonella. J. econ. Ent. 56: 140–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, J. A. and Howard, M. G.. 1968. Insemination without spermatophores in the Oriental fruit moth, Grapholitha molesta (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. Ent. 100: 190–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imms, A. D. 1957. A general textbook of entomology. 9th ed. Methuen, London.Google Scholar
Marx, J. L. 1973. Insect control (I). Use of pheromones. Science 181: 736–737.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norris, M. J. 1932. Contributions towards the study of insect fertility. 1. The structure and operation of the reproductive organs of the genera Ephestia and Plodia. Proc. zool. Soc. Lond. 111: 595–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostaff, D. P., Shepherd, R. F., and Borden, J. H.. 1974. Sex attraction and courtship behavior in Lambdina fiscellaria lugubrosa (Lepidoptera: Geometridae). Can. Ent. 106: 493–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otvos, I. S. 1972. Sex attraction in the eastern hemlock looper. Can. For. Serv. Bi-mon. Res. Notes 28: 22.Google Scholar
Outram, I. 1970. Morphology and histology of the reproductive system of the male spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana. Can. Ent. 102: 404–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Outram, I. 1971 a. Morphology and histology of the reproductive system of the female spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. Ent. 103: 32–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Outram, I. 1971 b. Aspects of mating in the spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. Ent. 103: 1121–1128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pointing, P. J. 1961. The biology and behaviour of the European pine shoot moth, Rhyacionia buoliana (Schiff.), in southern Ontario. I. Adult. Can. Ent. 93: 1098–1112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, C. J. and Lucuik, G. S.. 1972. Factors affecting calling by female eastern spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. Ent. 104: 1751–1762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar