Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-c654p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T03:49:08.352Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Release of native Trichogramma minutum to control grape berry moth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2012

Sudha Nagarkatti ,
Patrick C. Tobin ,
Michael C. Saunders  and
Andrew J. Muza
Sudha Nagarkatti
Affiliation:
Lake Erie Regional Grape Research and Extension Center, The Pennsylvania State University, 662 N Cemetery Road, North East, Pennsylvania 16428, United States of America
Patrick C. Tobin
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, The Pennsylvania State University, 501 ASI Building, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802-3508, United States of America
Michael C. Saunders*
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, The Pennsylvania State University, 501 ASI Building, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802-3508, United States of America
Andrew J. Muza
Affiliation:
Erie County Cooperative Extension, 850 Gore Road, Erie, Pennsylvania 16509, United States of America
*
1Corresponding author (e-mail: mcs5@psu.edu).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We studied the effects of inundative releases of the egg parasitoid Trichogramma minutum Riley (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) on economic injury by grape berry moth, Endopiza viteana (Clemens) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Trichogramma minutum originally collected from natural host populations near North East, Pennsylvania, was mass produced in tobacco hornworm hosts and Mediterranean flour moth. We released T. minutum in border rows, where grape berry moth infestation is typically high, of experiment field station and commercial vineyards from 1996 to 1999. We recorded significant reductions in economic injury in plots where parasitoids were released. In vineyards with low to moderate grape berry moth abundance, four releases during the growing season were adequate in reducing damage at harvest to below 3%. In high-risk vineyards, T. minutum releases reduced damage to levels below 15%. The use of buckwheat as a cover crop to provide nectar in combination with parasitoid releases showed potential benefits in parasitoid activity. A biocarrier and Biosprayer™ were used in mechanized parasitoid-release operations, and no adverse effect on parasitoid emergence was recorded from parasitized eggs using this approach.

Résumé

On a étudié les effets du relâchement d'inondation du parasitoïde de l'oeuf Trichogramma minutum Riley (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) des dommages économics dus à la tordeuse de la vigne, Endopiza viteana (Clemens) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Trichogramma minutum était remassé des populations naturelles qui se trouvaient près de la ville de North East, Pennsylvanie, pour faire la production en grands nombres. Les relâchements ont fait annuellement dans les vignobles de laboratoire et de commercials à partir de l'année 1996 jusqu'à l'année 1999 comprise. Les parasitoïdes n'a été que distribués autour des bords des vignobles où les infestations de la tordeuse de la vigne sont généralement plus sévère. Le relâchement de parasitoïdes a réduit significativement le dommage économic dus à la tordeuse de la vigne. Aux vignobles qu'ont l'abondance de la tordeuse de la vigne était au niveau léger à modéré, quatre relâchements pendant la campagne viticole ont accompli une réduction de dommage qui était moins de 3 %. Aux vignobles de risque élevée, le relâchement de parasitoïdes a réduit le niveau de dommage moins de 15 %. L'enrichissement de l'agroecosystème par l'utilization de sarrasin avec les relâchements de parasitoïdes avait des avantages potentiels dans l'activité des parasitoïdes. On a aussi fait une évaluation d'une méthode méchanisée pour dispenser en volume les oeufs parasités, et la qualité des parasitoïdes en fonction d'éclosion n'a pas été touchée par le relâchement.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 135 , Issue 4 , August 2003 , pp. 589 - 598
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agresti, A. 1996. An introduction to categorical analysis. New York: John Wiley and Sons, IncGoogle Scholar
Forsse, E., Smith, S.M., Bourchier, R.S. 1992. Flight initiation in the egg parasitoid Trichogramma minutum: effects of ambient temperature, mates, food and host eggs. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 62: 147–57Google Scholar
Gleissner, B.D. 1943. Biology and control of the grape berry moth in the Erie grape belt. Pennsylvania Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 451Google Scholar
Greenberg, S.M., Morrison, R.K., Nordlund, D.A., King, E.G. 1998. A review of the scientific literature and methods for production of factitious hosts for use in mass rearing of Trichogramma spp. (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) in the former Soviet Union, the United States, Western Europe and China. Journal of Entomological Science 33: 15–32Google Scholar
Gross, H.R. Jr, Harrell, E.A., Lewis, W.J., Nordlund, D.A. 1981. Trichogramma spp.: concurrent ground application of parasitized eggs, supplemental Heliothis zea host eggs, and host-seeking stimuli. Journal of Economic Entomology 74: 227–9Google Scholar
Hoffman, C.J., Dennehy, T.J. 1989. Phenology, movement and within-field distribution of the grape berry moth, Endopiza viteana (Clemens) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), in New York vineyards. The Canadian Entomologist 121: 325–35Google Scholar
Hoffman, C.J., Dennehy, T.J., Nyrop, J.P. 1992. Phenology, monitoring, and control decision components of the grape berry moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) risk assessment program in New York. Journal of Economic Entomology 85: 2218–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houseweart, M.W., Jennings, D.T., Lawrence, R.K. 1984. Field releases of Trichogramma minutum (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) for suppression of epidemic spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), egg populations in Maine. The Canadian Entomologist 116: 1357–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knutson, A. 1996. Evaluation of the biosprayer for the application of Trichogramma to cotton. pp 788–91 in Dugger, P., Richter, D. (Eds), Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conference, Nashville, Tennessee, 9–12 January 1996. Memphis, Tennessee: National Cotton CouncilGoogle Scholar
Laetemia, J.A., Laing, J.E., Corrigan, J.E. 1995. Effects of adult nutrition on longevity, fecundity and offspring sex ratio of Trichogramma minutum Riley (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae). The Canadian Entomologist 127: 245–54Google Scholar
Lawrence, R.K., Houseweart, M.W., Jennings, D.T., Southard, S.G., Halteman, W.A. 1985. Development rates of Trichogramma minutum (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) and implications for timing augmentative releases for suppression of egg populations of Choristoneura fumiferana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). The Canadian Entomologist 117: 557–63Google Scholar
Lewis, W.J., Nordlund, R.L., Gross, H.R. 1975. Kairomones and their use for management of entomophagous insects. II. Mechanisms causing increase in rate of parasitization by Trichogramma spp. Journal of Chemical Ecology 1: 349–60Google Scholar
Li, L-Y. 1994. Worldwide use of Trichogramma for biological control on different crops: a survey. pp 37–53in Wajinberg, E., Hassan, S.A. (Eds), Biological control with egg parasitoids. Wallingford, United Kingdom: CAB InternationalGoogle Scholar
Luciani, M.A. 1987. The biology of the grape berry moth, Endopiza viteana Clemens (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), in southern Ontario. MSc thesis, University of Guelph, Guelph, OntarioGoogle Scholar
McDougall, S.J., Mills, N.J. 1997. The influence of hosts, temperature and food sources on the longevity of Trichogramma platneri. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 82: 195–203Google Scholar
Mills, N.J. 1998. Trichogramma: the field efficacy of inundative biological control of the codling moth in California orchards. pp 66–73in Hoddle, M.S. (Ed), Proceedings of the First California Conference on Biological Control, Berkeley, California, 11–12 June 1998. Riverside, California: University of CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
Morrison, R.K., Rose, M., Penn, S. 1998. The effect of extended immersion in agitated liquid carriers on the viability of two entomophagous insects. Southwestern Entomologist 23: 131–5Google Scholar
Nagarkatti, S., Giroux, K.J., Keeley, T.P. 1991. Rearing Trichogramma nubilale (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) on eggs of the tobacco hornworm, Manduca sexta (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae). Entomophaga 36: 443–6Google Scholar
Nagarkatti, S., Muza, A.J., Saunders, M.C., Tobin, P.C. 2002 a. Role of the egg parasitoid Trichogramma minutum Riley (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) in biological control of the grape berry moth, Endopiza viteana (Clemens) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). BioControl 47: 373–85Google Scholar
Nagarkatti, S., Tobin, P.C., Muza, A.J., Saunders, M.C. 2002 b. Carbaryl resistance in grape berry moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in New York and Pennsylvania. Journal of Economic Entomology 95: 1027–32Google Scholar
Sanders, J.G., DeLong, D.M. 1921. Factors determining local infestation of the grape berry moth. Journal of Economic Entomology 14: 488–90Google Scholar
SAS Institute Inc. 1999. SAS/STAT® user's guide. Version 8. Cary, North Carolina: SAS Institute IncGoogle Scholar
Seaman, A.J., Nyrop, J.E., Dennehy, T.J. 1990. Egg and larval parasitism of the grape berry moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in three grape habitats in New York. Environmental Entomology 19: 764–70Google Scholar
Smith, S.M. 1990. Ground systems for releasing Trichogramma minutum Riley in Plantation forest. pp 31–7 in Smith, S.M., Carrow, J.R., Laing, J.E. (Eds), Inundative release of the egg parasitoid, Trichogramma minutum (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae), against forest insect pests such as the spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae): the Ontario Project 1982–1986. Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada 153Google Scholar
Smith, S.M. 1994. Methods and timing of releases of Trichogramma to control lepidopterous pests. pp 113–44 in Wajnberg, E., Hassan, S.A. (Eds), Biological control with egg parasitoids. Wallingford, United Kingdom: CAB InternationalGoogle Scholar
Smith, S.M. 1996. Biological control with Trichogramma: Advances, successes, and potential of their use. Annual Review of Entomology 41: 375–406CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, S.M., Wallace, D.R. 1990. Ground systems for releasing Trichogramma minutum Riley in plantation forest. Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada 153: 31–7Google Scholar
Thorpe, K.W. 1985. Effects of height and habitat type on egg parasitism by Trichogramma minutum and Trichogramma pretiosum (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae). Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 12: 117–26Google Scholar
Tobin, P.C., Nagarkatti, S., Saunders, M.C. 2001. Modeling development in grape berry moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Environmental Entomology 30: 692–9Google Scholar
Tobin, P.C., Nagarkatti, S., Saunders, M.C. 2003. Phenology of grape berry moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in cultivated grape at selected geographic locations. Environmental Entomology 32: 340–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Hamburg, H., Hassell, M.P. 1984. Density dependence and the augmentative release of egg parasitoids against graminaceous borers. Ecological Entomology 9: 101–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voronin, K.E. 1982. Biocenotic aspects of Trichogramma utilization in integrated plant protection control. pp 269–74 in Voegele, J. (Ed), Les trichogrammes. Les Colloques de l'Institut Nationale de la Recherche Agronomique 9Google Scholar
Yu, D.S.K., Laing, J.E., Hagley, E.A.C. 1984. Dispersal of Trichogramma spp. (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) in an apple orchard after inundative releases. Environmental Entomology 13: 371–4Google Scholar
Zhang, B.C. 1994. Index of economically important Lepidoptera. Wallingford, United Kingdom: CAB InternationalGoogle Scholar